> [EMAIL PROTECTED] text]}
> >
> > looks much better than:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED](multi-line text)]
> >
> >
> > All agree to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] format or should we
> > stick to the old way?
> >
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](multi-line text)]
>
>
> All agree to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] format or should we
> stick to the old way?
>
>
> --
> Raymond Irving
>
> > Leif
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Raymond Irvin
or should we
stick to the old way?
--
Raymond Irving
> Leif
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:23 PM
> Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] TemplateManager new fi
ng to reap with the new way?
Leif
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] TemplateManager new field format
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about changing
Hi,
I'm thinking about changing the way we now enter embed
fields within an html template.
The old way:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The new way:
{fieldname}
{fieldname[
This is a multi-line
embedded field tex/html block
]}
Which format do you think is best?
--
Raymond Irving
___
