I am also for number 3. Can we make the switch? If not
please state why not otherwise I'll go ahead with the
change to:
DynLayerInline
IOElementSoda
IOElementSync
etc...
--
Raymond Irving
--- Benoit Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Number 3, a winner !
>
> Benoit
>
> On Sunday, March 2,
Number 3, a winner !
Benoit
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 03:25 PM, Raymond Irving wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was just thinking about the naming convention used
in DynAPI for Extension libraries and came up with the
following question:
Which is a better naming convention to use?
1) DynLayer_inline
2
Not sure exactly where these come in to play, but I'm partial to 2) and 3)
in that order. Some names might read better depending on categories or
types of usage.
Leif
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DynAPI-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March
