Hi Alan,
Alan O'Cais writes:
> Hi Loris,
>
> For case 1, the actual problem has nothing really to do with including
> the software in EasyBuild, but building the software with GCC 10 (or
> higher). Rather than introduce them to something they might never have
> heard of and risk them
Hi Loris,
For case 1, the actual problem has nothing really to do with including the
software in EasyBuild, but building the software with GCC 10 (or higher).
Rather than introduce them to something they might never have heard of and risk
them responding "What do I care about EasyBuild?", just
Hi Kenneth,
Kenneth Hoste writes:
> Hi Loris,
>
> On 23/02/2021 13:42, Loris Bennett wrote:
>> Thanks for the information, John.
>>
>> So there seem to be a number of solutions:
>>
>>1. Software author patches software
>>2. EasyConfig author patches software
>>3. EasyConfig author
Hi Loris,
On 23/02/2021 13:42, Loris Bennett wrote:
Thanks for the information, John.
So there seem to be a number of solutions:
1. Software author patches software
2. EasyConfig author patches software
3. EasyConfig author builds against pre-10 GCC
There's another option if you
Thanks for the information, John.
So there seem to be a number of solutions:
1. Software author patches software
2. EasyConfig author patches software
3. EasyConfig author builds against pre-10 GCC
Would it be worthwhile having something in the EB docs about the issue
which would be
The default with GCC 10.2 is to compile with -fn-common which is causing
many issues with packages. In every case, I have encountered the software
should be patched.
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html
John Dey
j...@fuzzdog.com
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:45 AM Loris Bennett
wrote:
>
6 matches
Mail list logo