Re: [easybuild] 2016b toolchains: proposal & test results

2016-06-30 Thread Backeljauw Franky
Hi Kenneth, Two small questions: * Why don’t you condiser GCC 6.1 (or GCC 6.0) to be part of “all the latest & greatest”? * Is it necessary to have identical version of GCC for the foss and intel toolchains? It could allow to have foss/2016b with GCC 6.1 and intel/2016b with GCC 5.4…

Re: [easybuild] R 3.3.1 with Rmpi

2016-06-30 Thread Yann Sagon
Hello, After some investigation, the error is coming because when the compilation of Rmpi is done. The script try to load the module to see if it's working. It seems it's loading without mpirun or orterun or similar and thus fail with orte_init. I have tried to load the compiled module when

RE: [easybuild] Conflict in module dependency when installing Paraview

2016-06-30 Thread Erik Smeets
Hi Kenneth, > -Original Message- > > What would be the correct solution to this issue when using dependency > issues/conflicts like this in EasyBuild? > > Your conclusion is correct, but not entirely: the conflict is reported on on > libX11 that does not have a versionsuffix >

RE: [easybuild] Difference in toolchains goolf and foss

2016-06-30 Thread Erik Smeets
Hi Kenneth, > -Original Message- > >> Does that help? > We have plans to deprecate some old/inactive toolchains; the ones I have in > mind are 'goalf', 'ictce' and 'iqacml'. > We won't drop 'goolf' though, since it is still being used actively (i.e., > we're > aware of people using it

Re: [easybuild] Difference in toolchains goolf and foss

2016-06-30 Thread Kenneth Hoste
Hi Erik, On 30/06/16 09:03, Erik Smeets wrote: Hi Kenneth, -Original Message- Does that help? This does certainly help. Thanks for the explanation. Did I overlook this somewhere in the documentation? I might be helpful for new users to mention the status of the toolchains to choose

RE: [easybuild] Difference in toolchains goolf and foss

2016-06-30 Thread Erik Smeets
Hi Kenneth, > -Original Message- > Does that help? This does certainly help. Thanks for the explanation. Did I overlook this somewhere in the documentation? I might be helpful for new users to mention the status of the toolchains to choose the right ones. Are there any plans to remove

Re: [easybuild] 2016b toolchains: proposal & test results

2016-06-30 Thread Kenneth Hoste
Hi Damian, On 28/06/16 17:10, Alvarez, Damian wrote: Hi Kenneth, My only concern is that this means that CUDA won’t work in any of these toolchains, since CUDA 7.5 doesn’t support GCC > 4.9 or Intel > 2015. Presumably, CUDA 8 (to be released in August) solves that, but for the moment this