]
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: ECOLOGY Mathematics and the metamathematics of evasive ecology?
Re: Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
I am sure that we would all hope that the real issue is scientific, and
not religious
Just
, July 20, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: ECOLOGY Mathematics and the metamathematics of evasive ecology?
Re: Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
Honourable William Silvert and Forum:
Uh, oh--I've screwed up again. I keep forgetting that levity is
contrary to Newtonian physics (R.I.P
- Original Message -
From: Wayne Tyson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: ECOLOGY Mathematics and the metamathematics of evasive ecology?
Re: Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
Honourable William Silvert and Forum:
Uh
ecology? Re:
Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
Dear Cheryl Heinz and Forum:
The subject subhead is intended to be only a bit humorous.
I respect mathematics, but I don't overrate it. What I am waiting
for is an equation or a computer program that can stand up to proof
and predict
Mathematics and the metamathematics of evasive ecology? Re:
Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
Dear Cheryl Heinz and Forum:
The subject subhead is intended to be only a bit humorous.
I respect mathematics, but I don't overrate it. What I am waiting
for is an equation
-
From: James J. Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: ECOLOGY Mathematics and the metamathematics of evasive ecology?
Re: Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
Mattheus,
You are showing some misunderstanding of the use
and the metamathematics of evasive
ecology?
Re: Request: Data sets for biocalculus project
Mattheus,
You are showing some misunderstanding of the use of statistics. A few
observations.
1. If your results are so glaringly obvious, then the question was
probably not very interesting
After these brilliant words about an important topic,
a less luminous opinion about something that may be
related somewhat. I mean statistical tests.
I don't want to be a rebel. I believe this has been
talked before and repeated many times. But there I go.
Why to make those complicated and time
Mattheus,
You are showing some misunderstanding of the use of statistics. A few
observations.
1. If your results are so glaringly obvious, then the question was
probably not very interesting, or a logical consequence of the methods.
2. Questions that are not so simple need statistics to
Dear Cheryl Heinz and Forum:
The subject subhead is intended to be only a bit humorous.
I respect mathematics, but I don't overrate it. What I am waiting
for is an equation or a computer program that can stand up to proof
and predict--describe the phenomenon in terms of principles--Laws, if
10 matches
Mail list logo
