On 27 February 2018 at 17:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/27/18 18:33, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 27 February 2018 at 16:10, Ard Biesheuvel
>> wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2018 at 16:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/27/18 15:21,
On 02/27/18 18:33, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 February 2018 at 16:10, Ard Biesheuvel
> wrote:
>> On 27 February 2018 at 16:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 02/27/18 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 27 February 2018 at 10:43, Laszlo Ersek
On 27 February 2018 at 16:10, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 February 2018 at 16:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/27/18 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2018 at 10:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard
On 27 February 2018 at 16:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/27/18 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 27 February 2018 at 10:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi
On 02/27/18 15:21, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 February 2018 at 10:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi wrote:
Hi Ard,
Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I
On 02/27/18 12:30, Guo Heyi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:43:35AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi wrote:
Hi Ard,
Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I have one
On 27 February 2018 at 10:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi wrote:
>>> Hi Ard,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I have one question: why don't we
>>> implement a
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:43:35AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi wrote:
> >> Hi Ard,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I have one question: why don't we
> >> implement a
On 27 February 2018 at 10:39, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 02:25:14PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Commit 4bf95a9f361e ("MdeModulePkg/ResetSystemRuntimeDxe: Add more
>> debug message") broke the DEBUG build for all platforms that rely on
>> MMIO
On 02/27/18 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi wrote:
>> Hi Ard,
>>
>> Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I have one question: why don't we
>> implement a runtime serial port lib, which will switch UART base address in
>> virtual
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 02:25:14PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Commit 4bf95a9f361e ("MdeModulePkg/ResetSystemRuntimeDxe: Add more
> debug message") broke the DEBUG build for all platforms that rely on
> MMIO mapped UART devices, since it introduces a DEBUG() print that
> may trigger at runtime,
On 27 February 2018 at 01:50, Guo Heyi wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I have one question: why don't we
> implement a runtime serial port lib, which will switch UART base address in
> virtual address map change? I think this will be useful when
Hi Ard,
Sorry for the late of seeing this patch. I have one question: why don't we
implement a runtime serial port lib, which will switch UART base address in
virtual address map change? I think this will be useful when we want to debug
runtime driver in OS stage. And if we have a runtime version
On 02/24/18 15:25, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Commit 4bf95a9f361e ("MdeModulePkg/ResetSystemRuntimeDxe: Add more
> debug message") broke the DEBUG build for all platforms that rely on
> MMIO mapped UART devices, since it introduces a DEBUG() print that
> may trigger at runtime, at which such UART
Commit 4bf95a9f361e ("MdeModulePkg/ResetSystemRuntimeDxe: Add more
debug message") broke the DEBUG build for all platforms that rely on
MMIO mapped UART devices, since it introduces a DEBUG() print that
may trigger at runtime, at which such UART devices are usually not
mapped, resulting in an OS
15 matches
Mail list logo