Hi Laszlo,
Please find my replies and few more doubts in-lined.
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 4:42 PM
To: Shaveta Leekha ; Bhupesh Sharma
; Leif Lindholm
On 02/16/16 07:26, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> I have a doubt regarding memory sharing between PEI and DXE phases.
>
> Let's say I have a PEI library 'NorLib.c' and a DXE driver 'NorDxeDriver.c',
> where
> the DXE driver uses some APIs of the PEI Library to obtain information and
>
On 02/16/16 09:06, Shaveta Leekha wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
>
> Please find my replies and few more doubts in-lined.
I cannot visually distinguish your comments from mine. Can you please
resend your email with a mailer that supports sane quoting, or else mark
each one of the paragraphs you are adding
On 15 February 2016 at 18:20, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Juno is now managed in OpenPlatformPkg, including the ACPI
> tables - so delete this unmaintained copy.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
On 16 February 2016 at 08:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 15 February 2016 at 18:20, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> Juno is now managed in OpenPlatformPkg, including the ACPI
>> tables - so delete this unmaintained copy.
>>
>> Contributed-under:
Resending it
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:02 PM
To: Shaveta Leekha ; Bhupesh Sharma
; Leif Lindholm
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Dandan Bi
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 2:56 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Dong, Eric; Gao, Liming
Subject: [edk2] [patch 0/2] Refine function
I turned on profiling in Python:
BaseTools/BinWrappers/PosixLike/RunToolFromSource:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#python `dirname $0`/RunToolFromSource.py `basename $0` $*
PYTHONPATH="`dirname $0`/../../Source/Python" \
python -m cProfile -s time "`dirname $0`/../../Source/Python"/`basename
On 02/16/16 10:01, Shaveta Leekha wrote:
> Resending it
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:02 PM
> To: Shaveta Leekha ; Bhupesh Sharma
> ; Leif Lindholm
Base on the UEFI2.6, Add the new HII action type
EFI_BROWSER_ACTION_SUBMITTED to notify HII driver
when its question values are submitted.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Eric Dong
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi
Add new HII action type EFI_BROWSER_ACTION_SUBMITTED
to notify HII driver when its question values are submitted.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Eric Dong
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi
---
The following two patches mainly add the new HII action
type EFI_BROWSER_ACTION_SUBMITTED to notify HII driver
when its question values are submitted.
Cc: Liming Gao
Cc: Eric Dong
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by:
Series Reviewed -By: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
-Original Message-
From: Shia, Cinnamon
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 3:07 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: El-Haj-Mahmoud, Samer ; Shia, Cinnamon
Subject: [PATCH v2
On 02/16/2016 12:58 AM, Dandan Bi wrote:
This feature is aimed to allow OS make use of the HII database
during runtime. In this case, the contents of the HII Database
is exported to a buffer. The pointer to the buffer is placed
in the EFI System Configuration Table, where it can be retrieved
by
> On Feb 16, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Brian J. Johnson wrote:
>
> On 02/16/2016 12:58 AM, Dandan Bi wrote:
>> This feature is aimed to allow OS make use of the HII database
>> during runtime. In this case, the contents of the HII Database
>> is exported to a buffer. The pointer to
(trimming)
|Not wishing to influence the discussion, just out of curiosity: Jeremy
|mentions "numerous other BlockIo protocol providers in edk2 bounce IO
|operations rather than simply allowing them to fail" -- can we see some
|examples? I wonder if, upon seeing that code, we could use "git
I will test it on Juno and update the patch.
Thanks,
Supreeth
-Original Message-
From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org]
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 11:34 AM
To: Supreeth Venkatesh
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org;
graeme.greg...@linaro.org
On 02/16/16 17:36, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>
> (trimming)
>
> |Not wishing to influence the discussion, just out of curiosity: Jeremy
> |mentions "numerous other BlockIo protocol providers in edk2 bounce IO
> |operations rather than simply allowing them to fail" -- can we see some
> |examples? I
+1
I also would add there may be some HII strings that are hidden from user
interfaces, and reflect settings for field service or troubleshooting, and that
a mass export to the OS may expose these settings to OS runtime code and
possibly applications.
-Original Message-
From:
Fixes a minor memory leak in function res_mkupdrec() by
freeing rrecp on error return.
The error return is triggered by one of two conditions:
1. rrecp is NULL (calloc failed)
2. strdup(dname) returns NULL
Previously, the function just returned NULL. This patch adds a call to
free rrecp
On 2016-02-15 10:47:28, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> The "_maxMode" variable doesn't exist in edk2's variant of LzmaCompress,
> but the way one of the old uses of the variable is commented out (i.e.,
> together with the enclosing "if" statement) triggers the
> "misleading-indentation" warning that is new
Jiaxin,
This proposal looks incomplete to me. If the configuration policy is set to
Ip4Config2PolicyStatic or Ip6ConfigPolicyManual, then it seems like a lot more
configuration information would be required for the static or manual policies.
Can you also provide details on the complete
Mike,
Thanks your comments.
First, I agree other platform modules can also change the police by using the
set operation.
Second for the complete design, the proposed for the new PCDs will only be
consumed by Ip4Dxe/Ip6Dxe modules. The PCDs are used by these two modules to
determine the default
Hi, Jiaxin
Comments as below.
1. In the function description of NetLibCreateDnsQName(), whether below sentence
The domain name terminates with the zero...
Should be
The QName terminates with the zero...
The
Caller should take responsibility to the buffer in QName.
Should
BTW, the DNS_MAX_BLKSIZE better to be DNS_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE, according to the
words in RFC.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fu, Siyuan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 11:20 AM
> To: Wu, Jiaxin ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Hegde Nagaraj P
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Jiaxin
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 1:54 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Hegde Nagaraj P ; Ye, Ting
> ; Fu, Siyuan
> Subject: [Patch
Thanks Siyuan,
I don't have strong opinion about the name DNS_MAX_BLKSIZE or
DNS_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE.
For comments 1 and 2, I agree the changes.
For comments 3 and 4, according RFC1035 descriptions as below:
<<
Various objects and parameters in the DNS have size limits. They are listed
below.
For public library interface, we should check the input parameters and return
error code or NULL pointer if it's invalid, instead of use assert.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Jiaxin
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:09 PM
> To: Fu, Siyuan ;
That's fine, thanks Siyuan.
-Original Message-
From: Fu, Siyuan
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:17 PM
To: Wu, Jiaxin ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Hegde Nagaraj P ; Ye, Ting
Subject: RE: [Patch 1/2] MdeModulePkg:
v2:
* Correct function description.
* Correct max QName size.
* Add max domain name length check.
This patch is used to define a general function to create
DNS QName.
QName is a domain name represented as a sequence
of labels, where each label consists of a length octet
followed by that number of
v2:
* Correct function description.
* Correct max QName size.
* Add max domain name length check.
* Update to use DNS_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE.
The series of patches are used to expose one function defined in DnsDxe to
NetLib.
Cc: Hegde Nagaraj P
Cc: Ye Ting
v2:
* Update to use DNS_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE.
This patch is used to replace the internal function with
the exposed one defined in NetLib.h.
Cc: Hegde Nagaraj P
Cc: El-Haj-Mahmoud Samer
Cc: Ye Ting
Cc: Fu Siyuan
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Jiaxin Wu
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:52 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ye, Ting ; Fu, Siyuan
Hi Experts,
We are using the 'AllocateAlignedPages' function (inside
'MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/MemoryAllocationLib.c')
to allocate 512MB aligned memory chunk in a DXE driver.
However the memory chunk which gets allocated by this API is around 1GB.
I understand that this might be
34 matches
Mail list logo