On 1/21/19 10:21 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On 01/21/19 14:26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/21/19 1:53 PM, Gao, Liming wrote:
>>> Thanks Ard and Laszlo. For the minor change in single patch, the patch may
>>> be sent separately with the clear subject. Or, the patch
Hi Phil,
On 01/21/19 14:26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/21/19 1:53 PM, Gao, Liming wrote:
>> Thanks Ard and Laszlo. For the minor change in single patch, the patch may
>> be sent separately with the clear subject. Or, the patch set can be sent
>> again.
>
> Since it is hard
Hi,
On 1/21/19 1:53 PM, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Thanks Ard and Laszlo. For the minor change in single patch, the patch may be
> sent separately with the clear subject. Or, the patch set can be sent again.
Since it is hard to follow technical discussion when top-posted (see
Thanks Ard and Laszlo. For the minor change in single patch, the patch may be
sent separately with the clear subject. Or, the patch set can be sent again.
Thanks
Liming
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2019 9:17 AM
> To:
> >> This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and
> >> Laszlo to
> collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
> >>
> >
> > Laszlo may disagree with me, but I think that it is not always
> > necessary to resend the entire series when only a
On 01/18/19 12:09, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 06:38, Gao, Liming wrote:
>>
>> This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and Laszlo
>> to collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
>>
>
> Laszlo may disagree with me, but I
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 06:38, Gao, Liming wrote:
>
> This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and Laszlo
> to collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
>
Laszlo may disagree with me, but I think that it is not always
necessary to resend
This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and Laszlo to
collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
Thanks
Liming
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Jiaxin
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:32 PM
> To: Fu, Siyuan ; Wu, Hao A ;
>
Just confirmed with Liming, we don't need to seed the full series patches if
only one is updated.
Thanks,
jiaxin
> -Original Message-
> From: Fu, Siyuan
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:29 PM
> To: Wu, Hao A ; Wu, Jiaxin ;
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ye, Ting ; Gao, Liming
>
Hi, Jiaxin
Yes the full patch series is needed for a v2 version.
And also, why you removed the "(Instance->Token != NULL)" check in the if
condition?
BestRegards
Fu Siyuan
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:22 PM
> To: Wu, Jiaxin ;
Hi Jiaxin,
A comment that is not related with the content of the patch itself:
Please help to send the full patch series when a new version is needed.
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Jiaxin
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:16 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
