"Ralf Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Specially if maybe a little bit slower, would allow us to work together
> (Tine and eGroupware). I think, a little be less optimal solution, is
> absolutely worth implementing, if it allows to cooperate with the
> project. If you dont think so, allow me
Hello Admins!
As reuqested by multiple people we would like to move our svn to the
eGroupWare.org svn.
How can we continue to get the needed svn accounts for the Tine 2.0
developers which are not yet members of the eGroupWare project?
--
Lars Kneschke
CTO OfficeSpot.Net
Metaways Infosystems GmbH
Thank you for moving forward on this. From the admin perspective, I
suppose we need to know who and what. But I will need to discuss this
with them as well, hopefully not too much later today.
Lars Kneschke wrote:
Hello Admins!
As reuqested by multiple people we would like to move our svn
Dear Projectmembers,
We, the eGroupWare admins, still think the most democratic way to
settle the current situation is to vote on it.
Beside all of the reasons we have stated so far, the current
discussion on the lists has not resulted in an acceptable resolution.
But, it has instead added
Dear Admins,
On Monday 17 December 2007, Pim Snel wrote:
> Dear Projectmembers,
> We, the eGroupWare admins, still think the most democratic way to
> settle the current situation is to vote on it.
I, an eGroupWare developer, still can not vote for anyting on that ballot.
Certainly, there is an o
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Wolff schrieb:
> Dear Admins,
>
> On Monday 17 December 2007, Pim Snel wrote:
>> Dear Projectmembers,
>> We, the eGroupWare admins, still think the most democratic way to
>> settle the current situation is to vote on it.
>
> I, an eGroupWare developer, still can not vote for
"Pim Snel" schrieb:
> If we follow the path to merge the Tine sources into the eGroupWare
> svn, we ultimately will have to give every Tine developer access to
> it. This means they become eGroupWare members and that the proposed
> vote by Tine (which codeline should become the next release,
"Carsten Wolff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hello Carsten!
> --
> 3) Let things stay as they are, let Lars commit their conceptual code to a
> branch in eGWs SVN, for he is a full eGW member and, as maintainer of that
> branch, let him be mentor for contributors
Hi Lars and Connie,
I'm writing this mail on my personal account. I'm worried but also
hopefull and maybe a little happy, because I feel we are in the
construction fase of this endless discussion. I hope you have read
between the lines of the admin statements that Ralf, Miles and I
really
