Bill Coleman wrote:
What you'd end up with for the receiver would be a Mixer and clean
DDS, followed by a high-speed, wide-range A/D converter. Everything else
I don't understand why you write about such things as in the future.
There are several products on the amateur market, although I
On 7/9/07, Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This mailing list's spam filter has blocked 3 attempts by me to reply
to this thread. I think spam filters are more likely to be blame for
the lack of communication being complained of than any failings at
Elecraft.
How do you know that?
On 7/9/07, Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strongly suggest you call your issuing bank to confirm that
they offer that benefit. You might be surprized by the number
and reputation of the banks that do not.
When they tell me they don't offer it, I simply tell them I
will use their card
On 7/9/07, Lyle Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unbalanced, uses SO239 coax connectors. Think of it as being like the
KAT100 in capability, but inside the K3.
Can it be configured to be active for ANT A, inactive for ANT B?
--
Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n:
Hello the gang!
A friend of mine (F8BDX) just finished his K2 and he is very eager user! He
just have a small problem in CW. Using a bencher keyer thatr he was using
with his TS450, he get some bad dot or dash at moderate high speed. From
time to time asking for a dot he get a dash or wanting
Ok, to save everyone time and energy here is the post that will
otherwise appear in the hundreds... thousands? within a few weeks
PLEASE LET US JUST USE THIS ONE POST AND IT WILL SERVE FOR EVERYONE..
I got my K3 and I love it.
My K3 arrived and I built it in three hours.
My
On 7/9/07, Bill Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way of simplifying this whole process is to move the radio into
the computer. This is in line with a prediction I made way back in
1995 on the CQ-Contest list -- that the radio of the future would be
inside the computer.
I hope not. Clearly
On 7/9/07, Charles Harpole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, to save everyone time and energy here is the post that will
otherwise appear in the hundreds... thousands? within a few weeks
PLEASE LET US JUST USE THIS ONE POST AND IT WILL SERVE FOR EVERYONE..
I got my K3 and I love it.
Julian, I think Elecraft have realised they are into completely new ball
game with the K3. There are probably thousands of FT1k, FT2k, Kenwood,
Icom etc owners who will want to change to the K3, purely because it is
a better radio, but who will have no interest in any DIY aspect. They
will
There are some sill typos here. Apologies. I am hurrying because I am so
keen to get on with some decorating tasks!!
Chris G3SJJ
G3SJJ wrote:
Julian, I think Elecraft have realised they are into completely new
ball game with the K3. There are probably thousands of FT1k, FT2k,
Kenwood, Icom
At 10:25 2007-07-09, G3SJJ wrote:
There are some sill typos here. Apologies. I am hurrying because I
am so keen to get on with some decorating tasks!!
Chris, you can get medical treatment for that condition ;-)
Have fun with the decorating - guess with all the rain we've had it's
a quiet
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote:
How do you know that? Did you get a message saying it was blocked? Was
there a
reason?
Yes, I did get a bounce message back to say that my reply looked like
spam. Why a legitimate reply-to from a registered list member should
be considered spam I
I am linked in with a two part incentive scheme David.
Part A - I volunteered to decorate the lounge instead of getting an
outside contractor so that I could use the cash to finance the 2nd
payment on the K3 (1st payment from sale of K2)
Part B - Need to get the decorating complete and the
Dave G4AON wrote:
Scott N5SM wrote
When I set the CW speed on mine on 20 wpm it actually sends about 25 to
27 wpm.
I'm a bit late answering this one. My K2 is spot on, set to 20 WPM, it
is exactly 20 WPM based on the standard Morse test word of PARIS.
73 Dave, G4AON
I tested my K2
Though I really hate adding to what seem to be mostly OT threads, I'm
going to do so here and this will be my only post on the subject.
Several weeks ago, a reflector member sent a message to me, asking
that I post it to THIS reflector on his behalf because every time HE
attempted to post it,
On 7/9/07, Tom Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it doesn't take much... darn little, actually, to cause the
SPAM-COP detectors to start ringing.
Indeed. But why should that be so? This is a membership-only group.
There is no need for spam filtering. It wasn't important in this
particular
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is
not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of
spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see the
attempts here daily.
In general, if you get a bounce
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is
not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of
spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see the
attempts here
Turn off ADET (automatic detection). That will probably cure the issue. If
not, it's a good test to run anyhow. (Or, I've misunderstood the problem. By
bencher keyer do you mean Bencher Paddles with K2 Keyer or something
else? g)
Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456
snip
he get some bad dot or dash at moderate
This is woefully off-topic, but I cannot let this pass uncommented.
The quote in the previous post attributed to Franklin is one of many, many
misquotes floating around out there. The correct quote (see
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin and related links on that page)
is as
As much as you may not like it, the culture of this mailing list allows
such postings.
Trying to change the culture of a list by fiat is pretty useless, and
annoying.
73, doug
From: Charles Harpole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:23:44 +
Ok, to save everyone time and
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is not
under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of
spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Tom Hammond wrote:
So, it doesn't take much... darn little, actually, to cause the SPAM-COP
detectors to start ringing.
Spamassasian allows the user to specify words that could cause a message to be
trappedit sounds fine in theory...but it's possible to enter a word
Does the K3's bar-graph S-meter have a function to momentarily
hold a bar at the 'peak' value?
N1KO
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net,
and is not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds
of spammers
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is
not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had
We do have a subscribe confirmation requirement - and the spammers still
get around it. qth.net and we are too big of a target.
Let's end this thread. Its taking up way too much bandwidth on the list.
Also, guys, please do not try to moderate the list. I'll jump in as
needed. If you think a
I was hoping that the tuning rate could be set by mode?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 11:41 PM
To: Bill Coleman; Kenneth E.Harker
Cc: elecraft
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 SSB
K3 tuning is very versitile.
Folks,
Just like many of you, we at Elecraft are suffering email overload. We
process literally hundreds of list and direct emails daily (plus I watch
a wide range of other lists on the net.) I would like to ask everyone
to please minimize and --focus-- their postings to just Elecraft and
I'm sorry, I didn't make myself clear. What is not saved is the state of the
KDSP at power off (e.g.
which filter has been selected, etc) of course all the configuration parameters
are retained.
Doug
W6JD
-- Original message --
From: Lyle Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it does. There's a menu selection for this hold option.
-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065
On Mon Jul 9 12:25 , sent:
Does the K3's bar-graph S-meter have a function to momentarily
hold a bar at the 'peak' value?
N1KO
Like Old Time Marine Radio, and morse code? Listen in to how it used
to be done with the Marine Shore stations:
http://www.radiomarine.org/non8.html
The mainpage of this group is at:
http://www.radiomarine.org/
As licensed as amateur radio operators, we may not transmit back to
One way of simplifying this whole process is to move the radio into
the computer. This is in line with a prediction I made way back in
1995 on the CQ-Contest list -- that the radio of the future would
be inside the computer. In 1995, processors were just appearing
that had sufficient DSP
Is there an equivalent of spectrogram for use in Linux? I found xoscope.
However it does not seem to be supported.
Is there a good link for ham related Linux software?
Gary WA4SZI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must
Gary:
I've experimented with baudline (www.baudline.com) and it seems to work
pretty well.
73's,
John AA0VE
Gary Montalbine wrote:
Is there an equivalent of spectrogram for use in Linux? I found
xoscope. However it does not seem to be supported.
On 7/9/07, Gary Montalbine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an equivalent of spectrogram for use in Linux? I found xoscope.
There is Baudline, free from
http://www.baudline.com/
Is there a good link for ham related Linux software?
http://radio.linux.org.au/ -- hmm, seems broken at the
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Gary Montalbine wrote:
Is there an equivalent of spectrogram for use in Linux? I found
xoscope. However it does not seem to be supported.
Baudline, which others have mentioned. I also found gMFSK (using a
spectrum display in place of the waterfall) to be
You may soon be in luck:
http://www.sillylug.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=20Itemid=33
John Harper AE5X
http://www.ae5x.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Gary
Thanks for the timely response. Comments after your text:
On Mon, 2007-09-07 at 10:34 -0700, Gary Surrency wrote:
I see 271.6 ohms between U6-8 and ground on my K2, using a Fluke 179 digital
meter. So there is no misprint in the manual.
My measurements were with an Ideal 766 true RMS DMM
Thanks for everyones quick response. I shall try baudline. I will also
try to remember the archives.
Gary WA4SZI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change,
I'm finally getting back around to trying to finish my KX1, and now am finding
that output power is a hair under 2w rather than the prescribed 3-4.
I'm connected to a regulated power supply at 13.8vdc, output is through a Byrd
wattmeter to an MFJ 50 ohm dummy load. R4 is fully clockwise. I'm
I am looking for someone willing to troubleshoot and finish my K2, s/n
5567. I have completed the project up to the Alignment and Test, Part
II, page 60. At step 3 of the 4MHz Oscillator Calibration I get a
reading of 12600 kHz instead of the expected reading of 12090 kHz. It
has almost been a
CQ CQ CQ de COQP - Colorado QSO Party is July 15th!
The Pikes Peak Radio Amateur Association is sponsoring the 2007 return of
the Colorado QSO Party on July 15th! Mark your calendars now and plan to
get on the air and work as many stations in the 64 Colorado counties as you
can! The party runs
I am working on two K2's which both have a problem. No matter how and how hard
you turn the front panel knob, the display almost moves a couple Hertz, then
settles right back to where you started. I have no clue how fix this anomaly.
I'd welcome any insight the group can offer.
Thanks,
No matter how and how hard you turn the front panel knob,
the display almost moves a couple Hertz, then settles right back
to where you started.
Bill NA7Y
Bill, it depends wether it's an optical encoder or a mechanical. I assume
the latter but I am not familiar with the K2 (dreaming about
I recently started building my KX1, following the manual to the letter.
However, looking ahead I find that the manual does not include instructions for
the kxb3080 module for 30 and 80 meters, or for the kxat1-r tuner. Instead,
the instructions for these are packaged separately with the
Steve,
I just finished my KX1 within the last hour, with all the options. I had the
same questions as you. Having been the whole route, I rather wish I had done
what the instructions said, and built the basic unit first before even opening
the options. I had a couple of problems later in
47 matches
Mail list logo
