EI6IZ sed:
*
If you look at the sheet that came with your TCXO you might notice that
it does a good deal better than 0.5ppm without any calibration over the
temperature range that your radio goes through during operation.
The TCXO in my k3 is better than 0.5ppm over the temp range
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:17:51 -0700 (PDT), Julian, G4ILO wrote:
I can't
imagine that anyone would think there is a benefit in having audio
equalization apply in data mode
Your imagination is rather limited. There are very good reasons for
both transmit and receive EQ in data modes.
Frankly, I
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:58:56 -0700 (PDT), Julian, G4ILO wrote:
The other issue is the way the memories work, which I believe that anyone
using the K3 for FM - as I expect more people will want to do when XV144's
get out in the field - will consider to be not good enough. The channel
hopping
junior with one receiver and a new front panel design.
John
--- On Sat, 9/19/09, Dave G4AON elecr...@astromag.co.uk wrote:
From: Dave G4AON elecr...@astromag.co.uk
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, September 19
Unfortunately the K3 firmware seems to have wandered off track a bit,
two years ago when the K3 started rolling out the following were on the
to do list and formed part of the specification:
0.5 ppm TCXO calibration
Synchronous AM
These might not be the most important issues in the world, but
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 09:58 +0100, Dave G4AON wrote:
Unfortunately the K3 firmware seems to have wandered off track a bit,
two years ago when the K3 started rolling out the following were on the
to do list and formed part of the specification:
0.5 ppm TCXO calibration
If you look at the
D J wrote:
Unfortunately the K3 firmware seems to have wandered off track a bit,
two years ago when the K3 started rolling out the following were on the
to do list and formed part of the specification:
0.5 ppm TCXO calibration
Synchronous AM
These might not be the most important
...@astromag.co.uk wrote:
From: Dave G4AON elecr...@astromag.co.uk
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, September 19, 2009, 1:58 AM
Unfortunately the K3 firmware seems
to have wandered off track a bit,
two years ago when
.
73 Doug EI2CN
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of juergen piezo
Sent: 19 September 2009 11:42
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
K3
You can make some of the people happy some of the time...
D J wrote:
Unfortunately the K3 firmware seems to have wandered off track a bit,
two years ago when the K3 started rolling out the following were on the
to do list and formed part of the specification:
0.5 ppm TCXO
...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of juergen piezo
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 6:42 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do?
I still dont own a K3. I just cant bring myself to buy
] On Behalf Of juergen piezo
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 6:42 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do?
I still dont own a K3. I just cant bring myself to buy the
K3 because
The fact it is 2 years on and still much to do is good news. My radio
started out great (#101) and has just gotten better without me having to buy
much of anything (think 756, 756Pro, 756ProII, 756ProIII). I can look
forward to new innovations every couple of weeks. I hope they never
with a K3 junior with one receiver and a new front panel design.
John
--- On Sat, 9/19/09, Dave G4AON elecr...@astromag.co.uk wrote:
From: Dave G4AON elecr...@astromag.co.uk
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, September
...@subich.com
Cc: juergen piezo; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
Completely bogus is in the eye of the beholder, Joe.
While I find the K3 ergonomics to be much better than I
expected, there is room for improvement, as many have
K4IA wrote:
The fact it is 2 years on and still much to do is good news. My radio
started out great (#101) and has just gotten better without me having to
buy
much of anything (think 756, 756Pro, 756ProII, 756ProIII). I can look
forward to new innovations every couple of weeks.
But while we are waiting and waiting for the K3 to do something that is no
more and no less than what other radios do, we find all kinds of other
things being addressed like improvements to the audio, nice though I'm
sure
that is, which have far more recently become an issue.
I won't speak
P.B. Christensen wrote:
There's also a due-diligence obligation on the part of the prospective
purchaser: How difficult would it have been to ask Elecraft, prior to the
purchase: Will the data EQ bypass capability be absolutely ready at the
time of production and purchase?
Why would
K3 is a consensus-derived SDR
The larger the K3 community grows the harder it will become to get consensus
about it's FW.
I think this is giving Elecraft a hard time as well as a good laugh (I
hope).
The danger is that consensus gets disturbed by lobbying and shouting.
That might drive K3 into a
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:31:21 EDT, k...@aol.com wrote:
The fact it is 2 years on and still much to do is good news. My radio
started out great (#101) and has just gotten better without me having to buy
much of anything (think 756, 756Pro, 756ProII, 756ProIII). I can look
forward to new
pd0psb wrote:
K3 is a consensus-derived SDR
The larger the K3 community grows the harder it will become to get
consensus about it's FW.
I think this is giving Elecraft a hard time as well as a good laugh (I
hope).
In fairness I would point out that I'm only suggesting that the K3
On Sep 19, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Julian, G4ILO wrote:
There's also a due-diligence obligation on the part of the
prospective
purchaser: How difficult would it have been to ask Elecraft, prior
to the
purchase: Will the data EQ bypass capability be absolutely ready
at the
time of
-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of juergen piezo
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 6:42 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 firmware 2 years on and still much to do
K3 firmware 2 years
Grant Youngman wrote:
Why would I have any reason to think that it wouldn't? Other radios in
existence at the time of the K3's announcement already did that.
So what? That's an absurd assumption. Read the specs, read the
manual. Don't like what you see? Move on to something else.
I don't use digimodes and if I did I most likely would not have purchased a
K3. Frankly if I wanted to pound a keyboard like a computer nerd I wouldn't
even be a ham.
But that's just me :)
--
View this message in context:
No one needs to defend Elecraft or its reputation. And on the other
hand Elecraft has very thick skin, and take all complaints and
suggestions seriously but not personally. That's part of what makes
them a great company.
I don't want anyone to think that I drank the Kool Aid, but I'm
certain
26 matches
Mail list logo
