On 11/2/2015 8:19 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
> n the Elecraft manuals and other technical writing I stick with the S.I.
> standard notation. You can find details on line here;
>
> http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/units.html
>
> The units are on that page and click on the link at the bottom for
<elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's optionalKTCXO3-1
Yes, I've been following this as well. And to that end, I have a
commercial GPS Disciplined Oscillator that is used as a reference for
the test equipment in the shop. In checking m
an.qth.net] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
To: Bob McGraw - K4TAX; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's optionalKTCXO3-1
Bob,
Thanks for asking, I too have struggled to understand the need given I only use
the original di
Precisely or more accurately, accurate!
This pastime is no more inane than contesting or working QRP.
On 11/2/2015 3:50 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
IMX, such pursuits of precision become a hobby in themselves.
__
Elecraft mailing
ollars' worth,
N1HO
From: Wes (N7WS) <w...@triconet.org>
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's optionalKTCXO3-1
Precisely or more accurately, accurate!
This pastime is no more inane than
On 11/2/2015 4:57 PM, Bayard Coolidge, N1HO via Elecraft wrote:
> (And, to be even more inane, the correct abbreviation is "MHz."
> -capital M for Mega, capital H/lower case Z for Hertz, since it's
> aunit named for a person, and is therefore capitalized.
Notwithstanding that the accepted
-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Phil
Kane
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 5:07 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's
optionalKTCXO3-1
On 11/2/2015 4:57 PM, Bayard Coolidge, N1HO via Elecraft wrote
7 matches
Mail list logo
