Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] ARRL 160
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 7:46 PM
Very good points, Julius,
One of the mistakes that I make, and I hear being made is
the feeling of not being able
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:elecraft-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julius Fazekas
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:53 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; Dale Putnam
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] ARRL 160
Dale,
I know there are a couple JA stations with 3
Congrats Dale!
There were, at least, two other K2s in the winner circle ;o)
Gene, KB7Q and I both placed in the Top 10 SOLP... My certificate was
waiting for me when I went home.
Look forward to logging you and many other QRPers this year as well.
A couple of suggestions for any new QRP Top
Very good points, Julius,
One of the mistakes that I make, and I hear being made is the feeling of not
being able to be heard.
That just works against us. Qro has the advantage of thinking powerful.. qrp,
knows the power is in
the operator and the props. Now.. we also know we can't control
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:46:54 -0700, Dale Putnam wrote:
one may not assume that all signals are reciprical. He is loud,
therefore I am loud
This is especially true on 160M (and to some extent on 80M) where so
many operators are fairly omni on transmit but may be highly
directional on RX. This
Dale,
congratulations! Very impressive.
73 de Dave, W5SV
Dale Putnam wrote:
I just received the 2007 ARRL 160 1st place Single op QRP WY section
certificate...
The K2 does its best every day...
And I don't even have the better antenna up yet. (again)(dog gone
wind anyway)
Thanks to
I just received the 2007 ARRL 160 1st place Single op QRP WY section
certificate...
The K2 does its best every day...
And I don't even have the better antenna up yet. (again)(dog gone wind
anyway)
Thanks to everyone responsible, and to all the good ears that make this
possible.
C U in
However, my questions (finally) are these:
If I have a great Rx
only antenna won't I be able to hear many more
stations that I probably won't be able to work?
Maybe not many more, but certainly more if your Tx
antenna is lacking. That would be the case no matter
your power level.
Okay, so
@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:38 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] ARRL 160
Greetings All,
I'd like to collect QSLs from everyone using an
Elecraft in the contest this past weekend. I managed
to work all 50 states and thought it would be really
neat it they were all Elecraft users
Julius,
Would you (or anyone) please elaborate on the use of an Rx antenna?
Thanks
Bill K3UJ
This was the first time I used the Rx Antenna feature
and it was invaluable.
Thanks to everyone for a great 'test!
73,
Julius
n2wn
K2/100 #3311
Bill,
Often low efficiency antennas make great low noise receiving antennas -
example is a multiturn loop which can be quite directional, but transmit
efficincy would be almost 'zip'. Another example is traveling wave antennas
such as the Beverage - which also are directional, but the efficiency
On Dec 6, 2005, at 8:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you (or anyone) please elaborate on the use of an Rx antenna?
The fundamental problem on the low bands is the high noise level. A
good transmitting antenna can often have S6-9 noise, or worse. It's
hard to hear weak signals with
Bill and others,
The explanations by Don Ron were as always right on and very helpful.
I already knew the answers but enjoyed reading the replies anyway. I
still have questions, though, too, so please continue to read on (we get
there eventually).
I would like to point out a couple of
13 matches
Mail list logo
