I agree with you Jim. For years I've operated digital modes with a direct
connection between the IN's and OUT's of the sound card to the radio. Using
the VOX to control the T/R sequence {and any radio worth it's salt has a
good VOX, although many don't} does the trick nicely.
Now, if you end up
Playback can also be done very nicely, without involving your computer, with
the very slick KDVR3 in the K3.
Rick
K6LE
On 4/6/2010, at 6:55 , Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
Snip
With this approach, using available free software, one can record audio
direct from the receiver and play it back
I have a question about PSK31, sound cards and the K3.
I am currently set up to use my K3 with the LP-Pan for a pandapter
spectrum display on computer. I am currently using a separate USB sound
card (E-Mu 0202) as the sound card for this interface.
Someone told me that using the same
On Apr 4, 2010, at 11:22 PM, George A. Thornton wrote:
It has been recommended to me that I get the SignaLink USB interface
because it is easy to work with and reliable.
The SignaLink USB contains two functions:
(a) a 16-bit sound card (Burr-Brown 2909 chip) and
(b) an audio activated
Chen has given good advice here, but all jacks on the back of the K3 are
mechanically stereo jacks.
In the case of line-in, only the tip has an electrical contact (which
makes it mono electrical input). So it is convenient to just use a
manufactured stereo 3.5mm plug to 3.5mm plug cable to
FWIW. I more or less successfully used the K3 for RTTY and a brief taste of
PSK (too slow, like watching paint dry) with the internal sound card in my T400
Lenovo laptop.
I say more or less, because on occasion, the computer would refuse to output
audio to the transmitter. The display would
Wes Stewart wrote:
FWIW. I more or less successfully used the K3 for RTTY and a brief taste of
PSK (too slow, like watching paint dry
Good Morning, Wes...
I think you'll be pleased with the SignaLink box. You are right
about BPSK31 -- it is a bit slow. My take on this is that people like
wow - hand copying 40wpm? My hat is off to you hi hi. When I took my Extra
exam back in the early 90's, it was right at the limit of my ability to
scribble to copy down the text at 20wpm and you had to do a full 5 minutes
of it. My right arm was burning pretty good at the end of the tape...
I think you'll be pleased with the SignaLink box.
There is no value to the Signalink that can't be provided
by much less expensive USB based soundcards (e.g., UA-580
for $28.95 at Byterunner) or even the $9.95 dongles used
to support a headset. Since the K3 provides VOX in the
DATA A
On Apr 5, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
There is no value to the Signalink that can't be provided
by much less expensive USB based soundcards
___
The SignaLink schematic shows the same type of isolation transformers already
standard in the KIO3.
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:58:42 -0700, Kok Chen wrote:
The usual reason given for using a separate sound card instead of the
built-
in speaker/headphones of the computer is so that chimes, alert sounds and
music from the computer don't accidentally go out on the air (especially
when the
On Apr 5, 2010, at 4/57:33 AM, lstavenhagen wrote:
Still with PSK31, trying it out with cocoaModem, I find I can't keep
the
buffer full. I can get ahead on simple plain language but throw some
numbers
and punctuation in there and the buffer catches up pretty quick. 45
baud
RTTY
-USA.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM
supp...@microham.com
-Original Message-
From: wb6r...@mac.com [mailto:wb6r...@mac.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:11 PM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Cc: Joe Subich, W4TV
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3, sound cards and PSK31
...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:08 PM
To: wb6r...@mac.com; 'Elecraft Reflector'
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3, sound cards and PSK31
The SignaLink schematic shows the same type of isolation
transformers already standard
14 matches
Mail list logo
