DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL wrote:
I bet this will add some punch to your Top Band QRP signal.
http://www.ok1rr.com/news.php
Scroll down a bit. It is difficult to imagine the scale, so read a
little about it.
That will be an interesting experiment but I'm glad I'm not funding it!
There is
-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Vic K2VCO
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:10 PM
To: Tom
Cc: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: 3L rotating 160m yagi
Tom wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:20:58 -0500, you wrote:
I bet
Bill W4ZV wrote:
but the difference is significantly more on 160m because 1.8MHz is very
close to the
electron gyro-frequency (which varies from about 0.7 to 1.7MHz worldwide
depending
on the intensity of the magnetic field), which significantly modifies the
index of
refraction of the x-wave.
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:20:58 -0500, you wrote:
I bet this will add some punch to your Top Band QRP signal.
http://www.ok1rr.com/news.php
Scroll down a bit. It is difficult to imagine the scale, so read a
little about it.
de Doug KR2Q
[snip]
That's insane!
And... I'm insanely jealous!
I think those guys probably are scrapping the bottom of the Ham Purity
Test.
We join our Elmer on question 168:
168: Have you climbed a tower?
169: For a 80m beam?
170: For a 160m beam?
171: Have you climbed on a boom?
172: Inside a boom?
173: for a purpose other than adjusting the
Heck Guys,
I took mine down last week. Thinking of something to put up that is bigger.
Lee K0WA :)
GRIN
In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you don't
have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't find
any Common Sense, ask for
Tom wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:20:58 -0500, you wrote:
I bet this will add some punch to your Top Band QRP signal.
http://www.ok1rr.com/news.php
Scroll down a bit. It is difficult to imagine the scale, so read a
little about it.
de Doug KR2Q
[snip]
That's insane!
And... I'm
I took mine down last week. Thinking of something to put up that is bigger.
With that much work and cost involved, it's good that the antenna is located in
an isolated area. Can you imagine installing that system, only to find S9
noise from an uncooperative neighbor's plasma television?
Paul Christensen wrote:
I took mine down last week. Thinking of something to put up that is
bigger.
With that much work and cost involved, it's good that the antenna is
located in an isolated area. Can you imagine installing that system,
only to find S9 noise from an uncooperative
Jon Kåre Hellan wrote:
Paul Christensen wrote:
I took mine down last week. Thinking of something to put up that
is bigger.
With that much work and cost involved, it's good that the antenna is
located in an isolated area. Can you imagine installing that system,
only to find S9 noise from
10 matches
Mail list logo
