That is exactly right. And it is not a fault only of ARRL. You never
read a harsh review in RSGB RadCom or Practical Wireless over here
either. PW reviews are a total waste of time as they are completely
subjective.
--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Good idea, I tried 2 years ago with the K2.
Stewart G3RXQ
Carefully steering clear of Airplane trap.
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:59:01 +0200, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
I expect he will be interested - with any luck he'll be at the RSGB HF
convention, I'll ask him about this.
Shirley someone
plugs to unused
outlets on various bits of gear. This is not for the home lab.
David
G3UNA
From: Don Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/01 Mon PM 03:53:59 BST
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sherwood on ARRL Testing Methodology
As measurements become more precise
-Original Message-
From: Goody K3NG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another thing to note is that ARRL buys all the gear they review,
right off the shelf just like any other ham would.
And it's bought in such a way that the seller doesn't know it's going
to be an ARRL test unit.
--
As for
Thats is why new is not always the best, I keep my ft 736r for 6 meters and
my knwd ts 950sdx, loaded with all the options for Hf.. and I hope the K3
will out preform them all. as I expected with the FT 2000 which was a flop
for me..
Keeping my fingers crossed, on the K3 , I am on the third
When will the day come when the information in QST is more than a
fluff review, and a free multi-page advertisement for the manufacturer?
When the magazine publishing costs are not paid for by the advertisers?
I can't wait to compare the K3 with my 2000 and 1000MP.
Mike W0MU
Sent using the
Ouch - I would say he nailed it! I have serious issues with the AGC as
handled by the Orion's DSP.
What will the K3 offer?
k4ia
Craig Buck
Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
7 matches
Mail list logo
