Hello,
The Polar Bear are going out on March 11, 2006 for our moonlight madness
run. Some of the Polar bears are camping out over night.
If you would like to hunt the PB's on the air you can find out more
information at www.n3epa.org and click on the Polar Bear link. If you are
looking for
Spence:
I've been using Kester 285 for several years now and have had
extremely satisfying results from it. As good as Multicore.
73,
Tom HammondN0SS
At 10:11 PM 3/6/2006, Spence Wilhelm wrote:
Thanks Stuart,
After using the solder from Circuit Specialists for awhile on some
test
Does anyone know what modifications would need to be made to the CP1
Directional Coupler in order to get it to handle 200W at 20dB
attenuation?
I'd like to use the CP1 as a cost effective means of extending the
useful range of my OHR WM-2 QRP Wattmeter, but 30dB is more attenuation
than I
You have a couple options. The flux density is higher, and therefore
heating, with lower number of turns. They also go to a -43 mix (higher
permeability) for the lower turns to keep the shunt reactance of the
voltage xfmr high at 1.8 MHz.
If you don't care about 1.8 MHz, you might be able to
Larry,
If you have the time, I'd certainly appreciate it if you'd run it
through your spreadsheet for me.
Thanks! -Michael
==
You have a couple options. The flux density is higher, and therefore
heating, with
A quick check shows that no small size cores will work for -43 material
with 10T at 1.8 MHz and 200W. However, FT50B cores come close, and are
fine at 3.5 MHz. FT50B is twice the thickness of the FT50A, and would
fit on the board because the thickness would only add height.
73,
Larry N8LP
Larry,
Thanks! 200W is probably a bit on the high side for my needs (safety
margin), so this looks pretty good.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Larry Phipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:29 AM
To: Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes)
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Hi Michael,
I designed the CP1 for Elecraft and in the process I performed many tests to
evaluate the power handling capabilities. The power is limited by heating
of the core and that is primarily a function of flux density and time. The
published specification allows the rated power to be
It might also make sense to increase the turns to 14, which would give a
coupling factor of 23 dB, and much more safety margin.
Larry N8LP
Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes) wrote:
Larry,
Thanks! 200W is probably a bit on the high side for my needs (safety
margin), so this looks pretty good.
Hi,
After using my K2/100 for nearly a year I finally got
it hooked up to my Ameritron AL-811 amplifier.
Previously, I had used the amp only with my IC-746Pro.
I build a switch box to switch the amp keying. It
also switches out the amplifier ALC (not that the
K2/100 uses it) and it switches
Stacking cores can also help increase power handling capability without taking
more pcb space (providing the core is flat on the pcb).
-- Alan wb6zqz
-- Original message --
From: Larry Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A quick check shows that no small size cores will work
Bob, have you seen any difference between stacked cores and solid ones
of the same total thickness? In designed my wattmeters, I found more
heating with stacked cores... at least for one combination. The FT50B
core is the same thickness as 2.66 stacked FT50 cores, or 2 FT50A cores.
Larry N8LP
Bob
What combination of core/turns would give up to 40dB and able to
handle 100 watts and what frequency range would it have? Main
interest is HF
73
Jim VE3TTN
On Mar 7, 2006, at 11:46, Robert Friess wrote:
Hi Michael,
I designed the CP1 for Elecraft and in the process I performed
Robert,
Thanks for the insight and alternate solution! -Michael
-Original Message-
From: Robert Friess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes); elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CP1 Power Handling
Hi Michael,
I
All,
FYI, I just finished upgrading my KX1 to a four band radio! It is now
capable of 20m, 30m, 40m, and 80m. Assembly of the new module for 30 and 80
meters was straightforward and well worth the effort. Ron produced an
excellent instruction manual that greatly simplfied the process.
We've added a bit more description regarding scoring to the EQP rules.
If you were confused on any scoring issue, please review the rules page
again and let me know if it now makes more sense.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
---
http://www.elecraft.com
___
Just published on the Scientific American website is an article
explaining what we might see in the next solar cycle. Very interesting
reading. See:
www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa007articleID=000301B5-B8CD-140C-
B8CD83414B7F
73,
Wayne
N6KR
---
http://www.elecraft.com
That would not be very practical, because it would be 100 turns. I
suggest using the existing 30dB design, and add external inline BNC
attenuators like the Mini-Circuits HAT-10. That would give you 40 dB total.
Larry N8LP
Jim Byers wrote:
Bob
What combination of core/turns would give up
hi all,
yesterday I finished the KDSP2 kit and mounted it. It works as expected -
but when playing a bit with its possibility I found a regular (abt. 1 Hz)
birdie sound when I am listening on 14.249 (and quite a bit up and down
this frequency) when the Display button is pressed to show the
Hello Werner!
yesterday I finished the KDSP2 kit and mounted it. It works as expected -
but when playing a bit with its possibility I found a regular (abt. 1 Hz)
birdie sound when I am listening on 14.249 ...
This is normal auxbus traffic, only present when the menu or clock is
being
Wayne,
Thanks for a pointer to an interesting read.I was too busy with a divorce
at the peak of the last cycle, but the previous one was sure fun. Since I like
both HF and VHF/UHF weak signal this cycle has great promise. A good solar
wind to energize, and the odd explosion to make
Bill,
I beleive you are asking about an Amp Keying line for the basic K2 --
Take a look at the AMP keying partial kit from Elecraft and also look at Tom
Hammond's website www.n0ss.net for an updated version - I believe Elecraft
will be adopting Tom's improved Amp Keying circuit for the K2, but I
Fellow Elecrafters:
The new rig arrived from Alan today, and I expect to put it on the
air tomorrow.
What is considered an acceptable level of SWR for a K2/100?
73,
Steve Kercel
AA4AK
K2 S/N# 5383
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
Joe:
I'd be very surprised if you'd need the MOAA to work 100 countries on
80m. The K2 should handle it easily.
Comment on solar activity:
During my time at ORNL we were occasionally concerned with modeling
the long term history of solar activity, and we noticed that the
solar cycle is
Stephen W. Kercel wrote:
What is considered an acceptable level of SWR for a K2/100?
The latest K2/100 firmware and modification level will allow an SWR of
up to 2:1 before it starts reducing the power level to protect the
finals. You can operate with higher SWR, but you will have less
Steve,
Strive for SWR 1.5 although the KPA100 will not throtle back power level
until SWR 2.0 is exceeded.
73,
Don W3FPR
-Original Message-
The new rig arrived from Alan today, and I expect to put it on the
air tomorrow.
What is considered an acceptable level of SWR for a
hi Lyle,
txs for answering.
Lyle Johnson schrieb am 7 Mar 2006 um 15:28:
This is normal auxbus traffic, only present when the menu or clock is being
displayed. This is explained on page 38 of the KDSP2 manual Receiver
noise heard when Clock or DSP menu displayed.
you are right. I should
27 matches
Mail list logo