Great advice. Mine, from one who has done this unsuccessfully, and then
with advice, done it successfully, GO SLOW. This means small changes to
one parameter and some listening time before another change. The
changes to the various AGC parameters will have subtle effects, not all
of which
Gene (and all),
Yes, the AGC settings do help a lot. The K3/K3S has enough gain that
often the AGC is activated on the atmospheric noise in the band.
However, I think your chosen AGC settings are a bit extreme for general
use, but if your ears tell you it is good for you, then keep those
This has been an interesting thread to which I have experimented a bit more
and found the AGC setting recommendations from a couple of posters to be
very valuable, and Eric's suggestions on BW settings to be a nice compliment
to play with. Although, my ears still like a little HF, I like the sound
Robert,
Yes, those two mods are old, and apply only to the A level boards (below
SN 3000).
There have been improvements in the K2 sidetone incorporated into the B
level boards, and are also included with the A to B mod kit.
The changes added a 47k resistor in series with C24 (R11 for the B
The dates of the two sites mentioned are pretty old. I imagine that any
such mods or similar changes were incorporated in later K2's. Is this
the case?
...robert
On 03/22/2016 14:06, Bill W4ZV wrote:
KC6CNN wrote
They K2 might be old school, but you got to love the sound they have with
CW.
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
> … both Yamaha CM500 and Sony MDR7506. The Sony headphones are widely used in
> recording studios, and the sound of the CM500 is pretty close in sound
> quality.
The CM500 is fine for communication use, but maybe
On Tue,3/22/2016 1:34 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
What I use are a pair of speakers with a truly flat response all the
way from 80 Hz to 22 KHz but extreme overkill...: Mackie HR824
powered Studio monitors.
Yes, excellent AF response, very nice for recording, but massive
overkill. I have a pair as
None. Transmitting into a high SWR (such as no antenna connected) will
result in the power amplifier shutting down to protect itself as long as the
condition exists.
Hook up an antenna or dummy load. You should see full power output.
Elecraft has gone to great lengths to protect all of their
I so agree.
What I use are a pair of speakers with a truly flat response all the
way from 80 Hz to 22 KHz but extreme overkill...: Mackie HR824
powered Studio monitors. They are perfect to me and extremely flat. I
already owned them because I used to do recording. In this vein, if
you can
From: http://www.elecraft.com/KX3/KX3_software.htm
MCU 2.38
POWER OUT NOW 15 WATTS MAX, 80-20 M: On 80-20 meters, the PWR control can
now be set as high as 15 W (max is still 12 W on other bands). Supply
voltage must be over 12.8 V on key-down as indicated by the KX3’s voltage
display (tap DISP,
I have For Sale a very nice working KAT100 external auto tuner for the K2. This
tuner will tune just about anything. It integrates very nice with the K2. It
comes with the correct cables for K2 integration with your computer for Cat
control, power cord, and the manual.$200. shipped
I have For Sale a very nice working KAT100 external auto tuner for the K2.
This tuner will tune just about anything. It integrates very nice with the K2.
It comes with the correct cables for K2 integration with your computer for Cat
control, power cord, and the manual.$200. shipped
got it answered.
duh.
kg7hdz
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:28, Thorpe, Jeffrey wrote:
>
> Being a knucklehead, I tried transmitting briefly with RMS Express, and
> forget to connect my antenna to the KX3. Transmit power was set to 15W. I
> have the internal tuner installed.
Does anyone know what firm ware upgrade allows 15 watts for the KX3?I thought I
had upgraded with the latest but still have 12 watts output 73! Tomy KF7GC
AZ STM
NM AZ Section Net
ORS, www.atenaz.net
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
On 3/22/2016 1:30 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
IMO, the BEST speakers and headphones for ham radio are those which
have FLAT response (that is, equal at all frequencies) within the
speech range (100 - 5,000 Hz) and low distortion. If they have wider
response (like hi-fi speakers), that's still good.
two more cents - are we rich, yet?
Couple more comments on K3 audio quality and etc.
The MOT metal mobile speakers were designed for FM mobile and did
sound good. I don't have any so have not tried marrying one to a
K3. SSB sounds different than FM, especially full quieted FM.
Installed a
On Tue,3/22/2016 8:36 AM, Bill Davis via Elecraft wrote:
I use RX equalization AFTER I find a speaker that I can live with.
I suspect that the frequency response of the Motorola speakers are
carefully shaped for maximum speech intelligibility in a noisy
environment, and their response may
Being a knucklehead, I tried transmitting briefly with RMS Express, and forget
to connect my antenna to the KX3. Transmit power was set to 15W. I have the
internal tuner installed. What's the likelihood that damage may have resulted?
Jeff - kg7hdz
On Tue,3/22/2016 7:58 AM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote:
There was a very pronounced peak in his
audio around 300 hz and practically no energy past
about 800Hz. No distortion, just a widely skewed
audio passband. It was a boatanchor radio, so
there was something obviously wrong somewhere as
everyone
On Tue,3/22/2016 4:50 AM, george allen wrote:
RF is getting into your equipment.
While this is not the only possible cause, it's likely. Other possible
causes include a bad piece of coax or bad DC wiring.
RF split cores on all leads into your 2820 should solve the problem.
If the
Behringer MS40 outstanding with my K3, no RFI problems either.
73, Deni - F5VJC
On 22 March 2016 at 16:36, Bill Davis via Elecraft wrote:
> I am not much of a "poster", but this thread has had my close attention.
> I guess even though I have been hamming for
I am not much of a "poster", but this thread has had my close attention. I
guess even though I have been hamming for over 60yrs, I had somehow grown to
believe that speakers for voice communication or CW, for that matter, were very
NON- critical. In recent years I have come to a very much
Using a couple old Radio Shack "Minimus"
speakers, I find the K3s to be the best sounding
and easiest to listen to radio I have ever had.
I agree, the TS-2000 as well as the TS-480, while
an excellent mobile rig, does in fact roll off the
higher frequencies too much for my antique ears.
This
KC6CNN wrote
> They K2 might be old school, but you got to love the sound they have with
> CW. It is so easy on my ears.
It's even better if you fix the horrible distortion in the sidetone! It was
so bad that I found it difficult to zero-beat stations by ear.
TF3MA mod:
I had a 480 and did not care for the sort of pinched up audio compared to say
the 850.
I am using a couple of 6 by 9 speakers in enclosures on the K3, one on each
side of the stereo and the sound is just fine. As they say, opinions vary
and have so many variables like speakers, what/how/where you
RF is getting into your equipment. RF split cores on all leads into your 2820
should solve the problem.
from my iPad
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 9:55 PM, John Freed wrote:
>
> When I operate on SSB, any frequency at 100 + watts the display of my IC-2820
> signal strength
I agree with Vic - I want minimal AGC action, only kicking in on the
strongest signals to keep the audio level below the ear's attenuation
reflex (see http://n1eu.com/K3NA_rx_audio.pdf )
I have my threshold set at 14 (along with AF Gain at approx 9 o'clock and
RF Gain adjusted so I can just hear
27 matches
Mail list logo