For all you guys in the US, I have listed below the alternative shipping
costs for my K3 order which I'll place soon. I live in South Australia.
US Postal Priority Mail International = $131
US Postal Priority Mail International = $164
UPS Worldwide Expedited = $372
UPS Worldwide Express = $410
1. I plan to configure my K3 with the following filters -
Stock 2.7KHz
KBF3 General Coverage RX Filter Module
AM 6KHz
FM 12KHz
CW 400Hz 8 pole (uncertain about this filter)
Not having much CW experience and my current radio only using a 2.7KHz wide
filter for CW (Rx only), I'm not sure which
K3 only has the 2.7 kHz and the 400 Hz filters so far.
73 de Joseph Durnal NE3R
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Shane White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I plan to configure my K3 with the following filters -
Stock 2.7KHz
KBF3 General Coverage RX Filter Module
AM 6KHz
FM 12KHz
CW 400Hz
properly in Australia
Shane White wrote:
For all you guys in the US, I have listed below the alternative shipping
costs for my K3 order which I'll place soon. I live in South Australia.
US Postal Priority Mail International = $131
US Postal Express Mail International = $164
UPS Worldwide
G4ILO wrote:
I didn't get the option of using the postal service here to the UK because
the maximum insurance was not enough to cover the value of the shipment. I
assume that you just looked at the website, which doesn't understand this,
rather than contacting Elecraft Sales direct.
WW2PT wrote:
Yeah, well... it had better be soon. Us SWL natives are getting restless!
;-)
(We tease because we love...)
Paul WW2PT
Yes and I'm having trouble justifying $12,500 for an IC-7800 (which also has
synch AM RX).
I've been told though that the IC-7700 doesn't have
WW2PT wrote:
Wasn't me who said it! I know little about the 7800. But I have seen specs
online that indicate Synchronous AM mode (here for example:
http://tinyurl.com/43yz2g), but no mention of it on the Icom web site or
in the English brochure that I have.
As for the K3... I can (but
Found the following text at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/K3_Suggested_Configurations
AM filter $120. FM Filter $120, not yet available as of February 2008. Also,
the firmware as of Feb 2008 is not ready to allow the 15khz roofing filter
to work with modes other than FM.
Is this
Shane White wrote:
Any progress on this yet please Elecraft?
VK5ABQ.
Any idea whether the synchronous AM receive capability will require hardware
mods or will it solely be a firmware modification? If hardware mods are
required I would rather wait to buy a K3 considering the radio would
Any progress on this yet please Elecraft?
VK5ABQ.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Synchronous-AM-Receive-tp17959523p17959523.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post
Thanks Bill.
It's amazing to learn where Icom and Yaesu place their priorities. I suppose
they have chosen a different compromise between style and substance than
Elecraft. Icom and Yaesu's brochures and radios are adorable though.
Shane.
--
View this message in context:
When considering the differences between the K3 and IC-7800/7700/756PRO3 or
FTDX-9000/2000, apart from the K3's lack of band-scope, numerous large knobs
and colour screens, the other thing that stands out is the selection of the
1st IF frequency.
Most other radios use a VHF 1st IF (typically
Thanks Dave. I'll read your review.
Having been out of HAM radio for over a decade, I'm just trying to
understand where each company involved in selling radios is heading and what
their priorities are.
Dave G4AON wrote:
Shane
In the case of 14 MHz and the K3, the first IF is 8.215 MHz. An
Thanks Simon. I will.
Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
If you read the eHam.net reviews for the IC-7700 one thing stands out:
'Build Quality', followed by ergonomics, people are willing to pay for
this.
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6708?page=1 - well worth reading.
I would
Thanks Ken but I don't understand your last paragraph. What makes the IC7700
more capable in SSB mode than the K3?
Shane, VK5ABQ.
Ken-99 wrote:
The K3 has a different receiver design. Its first IF is 8,215 Mhz while
the IC-7700, IC7800 has an IF that is near 75 Mhz. The result is that
I think that's an unreasonable statement Joe. Please have another read of my
initial post. I didn't make any such assumption, I merely questioned the
relative cost and performance of some radios.
No 73's for you.
Shane.
Joe Stofko-2 wrote:
Hi Dave,
Right you are! Actually,
That's it, I'm going to ask the silly question.
How can the K3's receiver outperform that of the Icom IC-7800 and Yaesu
FTDX9000? These two radios cost in excess of $11,000 and weigh in at over
25Kg (55lbs)! The K3 costs about $2000 and weighs about 4Kg (8.5lbs). Yes
the K3 is deficient of a
Is this available yet please Elecraft?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/9KHz-AM-IF-Bandwidth-tp17198647p17198647.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
in the CONFIG:VFO CRS (VFO
Coarse) menu entry.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On May 12, 2008, at 5:07 PM, Shane White wrote:
Is this available yet please Elecraft?
--
---
http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft
So I could select the FM filter to provide a 10KHz IF bandwidth and then
narrow that down to suit me?
wayne burdick wrote:
Shane White wrote:
Thanks Wayne. I was referring the passband width, not tuning rate
thanks.
I thought the FM filter couldn't be used when listening to AM mode
Great. What's the approximate time between placing an order and receiving the
radio at the moment please?
wayne burdick wrote:
Shane White wrote:
So I could select the FM filter to provide a 10KHz IF bandwidth and
then
narrow that down to suit me?
Yes. Be sure to enable all relevant
Thanks for your help Wayne.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/9KHz-AM-IF-Bandwidth-tp17198647p17199422.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
I noticed a remedy for the following problem on the K3 enhancement list -
Some users prefer tuning the band with a wide filter bandwidth selected (for
example, using a 2.7 or 2.8 kHz SSB filter in CW mode rather than a 500 Hz
or narrower filter). Strong off-frequency signals (above about S9+5)
Thanks guys.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AGC-Design-of-the-K3-tp17199520p17199766.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AGC-Design-of-the-K3-tp17199520p17199788.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a
Wayne, I don't understand the concept of variable passband filters. Surely
the K3 will just choose a filter based on the current operating frequency,
and that filter will be used over a range of frequencies. How are these new
filters you describe different?
wayne burdick wrote:
3. Later
Very nice.
Will this upgrade be able to be installed on older model K3s?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AGC-Design-of-the-K3-tp17199520p17200418.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft
Cool. Nice to see logic reign for a change.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AGC-Design-of-the-K3-tp17199520p17200646.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
You meant to say affect other modes Joe, not effect.
Joe Subich, W4TV-3 wrote:
Excellent job Mike! And if someone doesn't like bass all they
need do is adjust the EQ. Now we have a choice.
No, adjusting the EQ messes up digital modes. In addition,
additional bandwidth below 200 Hz
be able to pick one up for about the cost of a K3 subreceiver
option! 73 de Ken - N4OI / K1
Shane White wrote:
I'm looking for a new general purpose HF receiver and have been
disheartened by radios, including transceivers, currently available on the
market for less than around $2K
Lyle KK7P wrote:
...I would like to know if Elecraft plan to incorporate Synchronous
AM detection?
Eventually, the plan is to have a synchronous AM detector in the K3. It
is behind a number of other tasks on the list, but it is on the list.
I noticed the latest firmware update
Lyle KK7P wrote:
...I would like to know if Elecraft plan to incorporate Synchronous
AM detection?
Eventually, the plan is to have a synchronous AM detector in the K3. It
is behind a number of other tasks on the list, but it is on the list.
I noticed the latest firmware update
Lyle, with the improvements you've described, will the K3 be able to receive
an IF bandwidth of 10KHz using synchronous AM?
Lyle KK7P wrote:
...I would like to know if Elecraft plan to incorporate Synchronous
AM detection?
Eventually, the plan is to have a synchronous AM detector in the
I'm looking for a new general purpose HF receiver and have been disheartened
by radios, including transceivers, currently available on the market for
less than around $2K. Consequently, I would like to know if Elecraft plan to
incorporate Synchronous AM detection?
I noticed the latest firmware
Is there any way to be automatically notified of the K3's developments, such
as the addition of synchronous detection?
Thanks,
Shane.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Synchronous-Detection-tp16534680p16534680.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at
35 matches
Mail list logo