You meant to say "affect other modes" Joe, not effect.
Joe Subich, W4TV-3 wrote: > > >> Excellent job Mike! And if someone doesn't like bass all they >> need do is adjust the EQ. Now we have a choice. > > No, adjusting the EQ messes up digital modes. In addition, > additional bandwidth below 200 Hz makes the signal illegal > on 60 meters where the occupied bandwidth is specified at > 2800 Hz maximum. Good engineering practice calls for a > default transmitted audio spectrum of 200 Hz to 2800 Hz: > http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/faq-60.html > > If you want to act like a spoiled child and be a bandwidth > pig, use your EQ to mess up your own signal. Allow the others > to occupy 200 - 2800 Hz and be legal on 60 meters without any > need to screw around with the EQ and effect other modes. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n4lq >> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 10:14 PM >> To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bass in audio is good >> >> >> Excellent job Mike! And if someone doesn't like bass all they >> need do is >> adjust the EQ. Now we have a choice. >> >> Steve Ellington >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mike Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> >> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 9:25 PM >> Subject: [Elecraft] Bass in audio is good >> >> >> >I am surprised to hear that people don't like the extra >> bandwidth in the >> > audio response in the K3. >> > >> > For me I have been reluctant to check into a regular rag >> chew net until I >> > could have some extra low frequency response. I knew that >> the K3 wouldn't >> > measure up and I didn't want the K3 to be seen in a poor light. >> > >> > Yes I am quite familiar that this is the opposite of good >> dx performance >> > but >> > these guys don't care about dx at all. They care about comfortable >> > listening. I of course care about dx when I want it and rag >> chew when I >> > want >> > it. Now I can have both. AM sounds so much fuller now also. >> > >> > >> > >> > I wouldn't want it any other way. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Mike Scott >> > >> > AE6WA Tarzana, CA >> > >> > K3/100 SN508 >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Elecraft mailing list >> > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. >> > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): >> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> > >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm >> > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com >> > >> > >> > -- >> > No virus found in this incoming message. >> > Checked by AVG. >> > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1413 - Release >> Date: 5/3/2008 >> > 11:22 AM >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> You must be a subscriber to post to the list. >> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm >> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bass-in-audio-is-good-tp17053403p17071544.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
