Hi Dick,
Sure, you're welcome to forward stuff like this.
As to stuff on my website -- I do NOT permit it to be copied to other
websites, but I DO encourage links to it.
73, Jim K9YC
On Wed,2/1/2017 8:16 AM, Richard Fjeld wrote:
Jim,
If you don't object, I'd like to save this and forward
Practical side only.
Assume you use a random wire antenna. AT in K2 or KX3 will not match all
bands directly. It will match with BL1 or BL2 in 4:1 mode. This is because:
1. After transformation, the impedance is more manageable to KAT2 or KXAT3.
2. Loss in balun. Mainly on lower bands with short
Jim,
If you don't object, I'd like to save this and forward to people as
arguments develop on these subjects.
I wish you had touched on '4:1 baluns'. Except for this group, so
many people I talk to think a balun should be 4:1, even in their
tuners. I think it is DX Engineering that
Oh, whatever power is generated by the transmitter is going to radiate.
The classic example of "radiating power" that is completely and totally
uninteresting is when you dump the power into a resistor (a dummy load)
and the power is radiated as heat.
There is a contest where the participants
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Thomas Horsten wrote:
> The ATU typically sits at the rig end where a balun sits at the antenna
> feedpoint
There's the difference. I'm feeding my dipole with 600 ohm ladder line so
my 4:1 BALUN is right outside my window. The coax (heavily
Kev and all,
A voltage "balun" can be tapped to produce a wide range of impedance
transformation possibilities, but the voltage balun will have no effect
on the problem of RF on the outside of the coax shield.
The modern consensus is that only common mode chokes should be used on
the
While it is "satisfying" to think of the ATU matching capability in
terms of SWR, that is not entirely valid.
A lot depends on frequency - at higher frequencies the "SWR matching
range" will be greater than on lower frequencies.
The only valid spec for the matching range is the available
Many manual ATU's consist of a variable capacitor and a tapped inductor.
It's a matching network but also works as an "on-the-fly" switchable balun.
The difference is the location. The ATU typically sits at the rig end where
a balun sits at the antenna feedpoint (and so may present the coax with a
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT <
k...@coldrockshotbrooms.com> wrote:
>
> That doesn't say the antenna would radiate it, but the transmitter could
> make power and the tuner/transmission line would deliver it to the radiat
Why wouldn't the antenna radiate it? Seems to
That's the problem with oversimplifying an explanation.
I read the original as "is it best practice to always use a 9:1 balun"
and the answer of course is, "if you don't need a 9:1 impedance
transformation, then you don't need a 9:1 balun."
73 -- Lynn
On 1/31/2017 5:17 PM, K9MA wrote:
On
On 1/31/2017 19:03, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT wrote:
If I did the math right (always a question) your load must be between
about 5 ohms and 500 ohms, so if your antenna is about 400 ohms (not
resistance, but impedance) then you're okay.
Not necessarily. That 400 Ohms could be almost pure
According to the KX3 documentation, the KXAT3 will handle a 10:1 VSWR
and "match" it.
If I did the math right (always a question) your load must be between
about 5 ohms and 500 ohms, so if your antenna is about 400 ohms (not
resistance, but impedance) then you're okay.
If you have a 600 ohm
There's quite a lot of interesting theory in the thread, but I think for
practical purposes my original answer still covers it, under the premise
we're talking QRP with a short feedline of RG58 (a few yards).
Small autotransformer baluns like the LDG 4:1 I use (I haven't tried the
Elecraft one
We have all learned to say, "Yes Dear." and carry on.
73,
Kevin. KD5ONS
On 1/31/2017 3:11 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
This list is a lot like being male and married ... no matter what you
do or say, you're going to be told you're wrong. [:-)
Most common baluns are *not
This list is a lot like being male and married ... no matter what you do
or say, you're going to be told you're wrong. [:-)
Most common baluns are *not transformers* as the energy does not pass
solely from input to output by magnetic coupling. In fact, I would
hazard a guess that *none* of
What I have failed to see in this thread is that the *wire* in a proper
"balun" (more properly a common mode choke) is a transmission line,
That transmission line can be two conductors side by side, or it can be
two twisted wires, or it can be coax or any other type of transmission line.
Its
AM
To: gliderboy1955 <gliderboy1...@yahoo.com>; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 9:1 Balun
Be careful in the 9 to 1 vs 4 to 1 vs 1 to 1. The 9:1 is generally an UNUN.
When you run 100 watts or less most 1kw manufactured baluns or Ununs will take
a wide variety of SWR if you ar
Excellent explanation, Joe.
Thanks,
matt W6NIA
On 1/31/2017 12:12 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
On 1/31/2017 2:16 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
> A bal-un is a transformer. Technically, it has two windings on a
> ferromagnetic core material which for RF is typically some flavor of
> ferrite,
On 1/31/2017 2:16 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
> A bal-un is a transformer. Technically, it has two windings on a
> ferromagnetic core material which for RF is typically some flavor of
> ferrite, usually in the form of a toroid.
Most common baluns are *not transformers* as the energy does not pass
On 1/31/2017 1:50 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
Last I looked, there was no description of the Elecraft "balun" telling
us what it is. Perhaps Eric or Wayne could add that to the catalog
listing for it.
The manual for the Elecraft BL2 shows exactly what it is:
From the un-un/bal-un traffic, it seems there is some confusion and a
couple of "alternative facts" regarding this subject. Fortunately, it
is much more straightforward that it might seem.
A bal-un is a transformer. Technically, it has two windings on a
ferromagnetic core material which for
All of this discussion becomes badly confusing by failing to describe
these circuit elements by their real name. The word "balun" is a bastard
-- it is widely used to describe nearly a dozen things that are VERY
different from each other.
W4TV got it right by adding the correct description,
I have limited experience with a wire fed via a 9:1 "un-un", but that
experience was VERY good.
I borrowed a KX3 from a friend when I went to visit family in FL a few
years ago. I had a 9:1 "un-un", about 126' of wire, and 50 feet of RG8-X. I
got the feedpoint, up 30 feet into a tree, and the far
Be careful in the 9 to 1 vs 4 to 1 vs 1 to 1. The 9:1 is generally an UNUN.
When you run 100 watts or less most 1kw manufactured baluns or Ununs will
take a wide variety of SWR if you are only running 100 watts. Because this
thread is I believe about QRP the amount of power dissipated due to loss
On 1/31/2017 3:43 AM, Thomas Horsten wrote:
Depends on your random wire and what band(s) you want to use. For
some bands the 9:1 "balun" (not used as a true balun in this case,
since both the coax and the random wire are unbalanced by nature)
will step the feedpoint impedance down to something
Depends on your random wire and what band(s) you want to use. For some
bands the 9:1 "balun" (not used as a true balun in this case, since both
the coax and the random wire are unbalanced by nature) will step the
feedpoint impedance down to something that's a better match for the 50 ohm
coax,
What are the advantages/disadvantages of using a 9:1 balun v. using the
switchable Elecraft balun at 1:1 or 4:1 or no balun at all when using a random
wire portable?
Why 9:1?
Thanks
73 Eric WD6DBM
Sent on my Samsung Galaxy S® 6.
__
27 matches
Mail list logo