RE: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-06 Thread EricJ
I think you are right on the money, Craig. That's my concern, that we are all living a long-standing myth which DID have a basis in fact 30 years ago, but is irrelevant to the world today. LOCAL hams can provide a vital communication link with VHF from the immediate area hit to the outside world.

RE: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-06 Thread Craig Rairdin
The longer we hold onto this myth, the more likely we are going to be found out by those who regulate ham radio. We need leaders who can help shape ham radio to fit the current reality, not bemoan the dirth of skilled CW operators as a problem. This all wraps around to dropping the Morse

RE: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-06 Thread EricJ
Exactly. I fought every attempt to dumb down or eliminate the code requirement in the past. I MAY have been right 30 years ago, but it is wrong today. It is just another mode with its own advantages and disadvantages. It is my mode of choice just as it is yours, but others make different choices

RE: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-06 Thread Dale Putnam
Those who worry about ham radio becoming another citizen's band need only scan 75M at night. They're too late. :-) Craig Until a cw op pops up in the middle... calls cq, gets and answer, has a chat, sez 73, then moves on, and someone on ssb says, what was that? The long haul cw nts ops

[Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Phil wrote: That was interesting. In 1958 I was on the National Geophysical Expedition to the North Pole on Drift station Alpha. KL7FLA and W9DVM/MM. We were floating. When we had severe aurora and you could turn all gains wide open and hear nothing, CW was always the first to be heard from

Re: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-05 Thread Kevin Rock
Thank you Ron ;) My first experience with the Amateur Radio Service was through participation in nets. These were FM repeater nets initially, then SSB HF nets, and finally CW NTS nets. I learned to pass traffic for NTS both using voice and via CW. It takes practice. Net procedures,

RE: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-05 Thread Craig Rairdin
I submit that the reason virtually ALL emergency nets are phone is that CW requires a skill few Hams have today: even routine CW ops. In the Ham world, using phone means that more operators are available everywhere, so there are likely more operators available any time and in any place

RE: [Elecraft] CW in Emergencies? (WAS: Dropping the Code Test)

2005-09-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Craig wrote: I suspect that both ham radio and the federal government are living in the past. The Internet has eliminated much of the traditional ham radio activity surrounding disasters (with the exception of course of local VHF activity), and 24-hour news networks have become better eyes and