Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-08 Thread Susaki Jun-ichi
Thank you for follow-up comments.
In case of minor change, the firmware change needs no recertification. 
A great improvement in transmission requires the recertification.
For example, KX-3 became allowed to transmit FM and AM after the first lot.
Equipment with ESSB mode over 3 kHz width (=Japanese limit) may not be accepted 
by JARD. 
 
Jun, JI1TLL
 
 From: wun...@wunderwood.org
 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:14:32 -0800
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3   
 orK3X
 
 One Japanese amateur had the opinion that firmware upgrades would require 
 recertification. Perhaps that is true, but it also might be just as accurate 
 as my opinion about what the FCC would do. If I were a betting man, I would 
 not bet on my opinion about the FCC.
 
 Basically, let's not jump to the conclusion that the Japanese are trying to 
 exclude US radios. Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality 
 transmitters off the air in their country. That is a good thing.
 
 wunder
 K6WRU
 
 On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
 
  But Elecraft doesn't have to get a new type approval from the FCC every 
  time they change the firmware. The post I quoted (included below) indicates 
  that the Japanese manufacturers need to get approval from JARD whenever 
  they want to change the firmware. Having the expense of jumping thru a 
  bureaucratic hoop would certainly act as a disincentive.
  
  Cheers - Bill
  
  On 1/7/14 at 6:32 PM, wun...@wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) wrote:
  
  Radios in the US need FCC approval, too. I don't think this is all that 
  different. --wunder
  
  On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
  
  This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous 
  product improvement on our
  Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.
  
  Cheers - Bill, AE6JV
  
  On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:
  
  We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
  revised even now.
   JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
  machine.
  
  ---
  Bill Frantz| gets() remains as a monument | Periwinkle
  (408)356-8506  | to C's continuing support of | 16345 Englewood Ave
  www.pwpconsult.com | buffer overruns. | Los Gatos, CA 95032
  
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 --
 Walter Underwood
 wun...@wunderwood.org
 
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Seiji Okumura

And why do they not have such certification?


Probably I think that this is because Japanese importer and Elecraft do not
apply to JARD for the examination with a certificate of K3.

Oku JK1KSB

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 
orK3X




On 1/6/2014 9:01 AM, Seiji Okumura wrote:

K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm


And why do they not have such certification?

73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Robert Nobis
Jim,

I assume it requires a business decision. There may not be sufficient
enough customer base in Japan to warrant the cost of Elecraft getting the
certification for the K3 and KX3.

Bob  -  N7RJN

On 1/6/14, 10:37 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

On 1/6/2014 9:01 AM, Seiji Okumura wrote:
 K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
 See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm

And why do they not have such certification?

73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Doug Turnbull
Friends,
 These approvals: CE, UL, FCC and JARD all cost money to obtain.   There
is some redundancy between them and type approvals can be used as barriers
to free trade.  Standards are needed but when each nation has its own then
it is expensive and time consuming for a small manufacturer to break into
new markets.   I would prefer the Elecraft engineers worked on product
improvement rather than yet another type approval.

   73 Doug EI2CN

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Robert Nobis
Sent: 07 January 2014 08:51
To: j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3
orK3X

Jim,

I assume it requires a business decision. There may not be sufficient
enough customer base in Japan to warrant the cost of Elecraft getting the
certification for the K3 and KX3.

Bob  -  N7RJN

On 1/6/14, 10:37 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

On 1/6/2014 9:01 AM, Seiji Okumura wrote:
 K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
 See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm

And why do they not have such certification?

73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Jörg Hochheimer, DL6ZBN

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Seiji Okumura

Bob-san,

Of course I think so, too.hi.

Oku JK1KSB

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Nobis n7...@nobis.net

To: j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 
orK3X




Jim,

I assume it requires a business decision. There may not be sufficient
enough customer base in Japan to warrant the cost of Elecraft getting the
certification for the K3 and KX3.

Bob  -  N7RJN


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Jim Brown

On 1/8/2014 3:09 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote:

I assume it requires a business decision.


Actually, I  was looking for a factual answer, not a guess.  Having been 
alive for 73 years and working in business for the last 40 or so, I can 
guess as well as the next man. :)  And yes, I smell restraint of trade.


73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread 須崎 純一




To friends coming to Japan with KX3,



A Japanese agent may apply JARD Technical
Standard Certification Number, however,this number is basically assigned to the
equipment with high completeness after critical check.



We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
revised even now.

JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
machine.



My KX-3 is registered as a homebrew at
JA-FCC.



The number is not assigned to any imported transceiver
so far.


Jun JI1TLL,

 From: dxcc-...@tiara.ocn.ne.jp
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:28:29 +0900
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3   
 orK3X
 
 Bob-san,
 
 Of course I think so, too.hi.
 
 Oku JK1KSB
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Robert Nobis n7...@nobis.net
 To: j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:51 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 
 orK3X
 
 
  Jim,
 
  I assume it requires a business decision. There may not be sufficient
  enough customer base in Japan to warrant the cost of Elecraft getting the
  certification for the K3 and KX3.
 
  Bob  -  N7RJN
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Jim Brown
On 1/7/2014 6:53 AM, 須崎 純一 wrote:
 JARD can never accept such a moving spec.machine.

Not sure I follow that logic. But they can certify an FT1000MP, which
generates nasty clicks, and a Mark V, which generates nasty clicks. And
a 7600 which generates nasty clicks.

73, Jim K9YC


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread David Withers
Pretty standard restraint of trade, similar in other industries.  Not much to 
do, just the way it is in Japan.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

On 1/7/2014 6:53 AM, 須崎 純一 wrote:
 JARD can never accept such a moving spec.machine.

Not sure I follow that logic. But they can certify an FT1000MP, which
generates nasty clicks, and a Mark V, which generates nasty clicks. And
a 7600 which generates nasty clicks.

73, Jim K9YC


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Robert Nobis
Jim,

I suspect the issue is that Elecraft simply has not pursued getting the
certification. Possibly the ROI doesn’t justify doing this.

At any rate, there is a procedure for an individual to get a temporary
certification for use while traveling in Japan.


Bob - N7RJN 



On 1/7/14, 2:08 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

On 1/7/2014 6:53 AM, 須崎 純一 wrote:
 JARD can never accept such a moving spec.machine.

Not sure I follow that logic. But they can certify an FT1000MP, which
generates nasty clicks, and a Mark V, which generates nasty clicks. And
a 7600 which generates nasty clicks.

73, Jim K9YC


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Bill Frantz
This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get 
continuous product improvement on our Japanese radios the way we 
do from Elecraft.


Cheers - Bill, AE6JV

On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:


We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
revised even now.

JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
machine.


-
Bill Frantz| The first thing you need when  | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506  | using a perimeter defense is a | 16345 
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | perimeter. | Los Gatos, 
CA 95032


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Walter Underwood
Radios in the US need FCC approval, too. I don't think this is all that 
different. --wunder

On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:

 This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous 
 product improvement on our Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.
 
 Cheers - Bill, AE6JV
 
 On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:
 
 We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
 revised even now.
 
 JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
 machine.
 
 -
 Bill Frantz| The first thing you need when  | Periwinkle
 (408)356-8506  | using a perimeter defense is a | 16345 Englewood Ave
 www.pwpconsult.com | perimeter. | Los Gatos, CA 95032
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT
That and if your only goal as a company is to make money it doesn't pay 
to give away upgrades.  If you are going to do an upgrade, make a new 
radio with new features and sell it.


If your goal is to produce great stuff, take care of your customers (get 
referrals) and make a living, you do it the way Elecraft does.


That's why I have a KX3 and not an FT-817.

73 -- Lynn

On 1/7/2014 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous 
product improvement on our Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.


Cheers - Bill, AE6JV

On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:


We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
revised even now.

JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
machine.




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Bill Frantz
But Elecraft doesn't have to get a new type approval from the 
FCC every time they change the firmware. The post I quoted 
(included below) indicates that the Japanese manufacturers need 
to get approval from JARD whenever they want to change the 
firmware. Having the expense of jumping thru a bureaucratic hoop 
would certainly act as a disincentive.


Cheers - Bill

On 1/7/14 at 6:32 PM, wun...@wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) wrote:


Radios in the US need FCC approval, too. I don't think this is all that 
different. --wunder

On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:


This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous product 
improvement on our

Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.


Cheers - Bill, AE6JV

On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:


We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
revised even now.
  JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
machine.


---
Bill Frantz| gets() remains as a monument | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506  | to C's continuing support of | 16345 
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | buffer overruns. | Los Gatos, 
CA 95032


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Walter Underwood
One Japanese amateur had the opinion that firmware upgrades would require 
recertification. Perhaps that is true, but it also might be just as accurate as 
my opinion about what the FCC would do. If I were a betting man, I would not 
bet on my opinion about the FCC.

Basically, let's not jump to the conclusion that the Japanese are trying to 
exclude US radios. Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality 
transmitters off the air in their country. That is a good thing.

wunder
K6WRU

On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:

 But Elecraft doesn't have to get a new type approval from the FCC every time 
 they change the firmware. The post I quoted (included below) indicates that 
 the Japanese manufacturers need to get approval from JARD whenever they want 
 to change the firmware. Having the expense of jumping thru a bureaucratic 
 hoop would certainly act as a disincentive.
 
 Cheers - Bill
 
 On 1/7/14 at 6:32 PM, wun...@wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) wrote:
 
 Radios in the US need FCC approval, too. I don't think this is all that 
 different. --wunder
 
 On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
 
 This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous 
 product improvement on our
 Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.
 
 Cheers - Bill, AE6JV
 
 On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:
 
 We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
 revised even now.
  JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
 machine.
 
 ---
 Bill Frantz| gets() remains as a monument | Periwinkle
 (408)356-8506  | to C's continuing support of | 16345 Englewood Ave
 www.pwpconsult.com | buffer overruns. | Los Gatos, CA 95032
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Keith Onishi
Having JARD Technical Standard Certification Number is not mandatory for ham 
radio transmitters.
The transmitter without JARD Technical Standard Certification Number can get 
individually certified for the licensed amateur who has applied the 
certification to add the transmitter into his approved gears.

The most obvious issue for K3 to get JARD Technical Standard Certification 
Number is 60m transmission capability. K3 having 60m transmission capability 
will not get the number. Same is for KX3.
I got a K3/100 last December and am composing documents to apply the 
certification with 60m transmission capability disabled in firmware level.

73 de JH3SIF, Keith

On 2014/01/08, at 13:14, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:

 One Japanese amateur had the opinion that firmware upgrades would require 
 recertification. Perhaps that is true, but it also might be just as accurate 
 as my opinion about what the FCC would do. If I were a betting man, I would 
 not bet on my opinion about the FCC.
 
 Basically, let's not jump to the conclusion that the Japanese are trying to 
 exclude US radios. Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality 
 transmitters off the air in their country. That is a good thing.
 
 wunder
 K6WRU
 
 On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:44 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
 
 But Elecraft doesn't have to get a new type approval from the FCC every time 
 they change the firmware. The post I quoted (included below) indicates that 
 the Japanese manufacturers need to get approval from JARD whenever they want 
 to change the firmware. Having the expense of jumping thru a bureaucratic 
 hoop would certainly act as a disincentive.
 
 Cheers - Bill
 
 On 1/7/14 at 6:32 PM, wun...@wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) wrote:
 
 Radios in the US need FCC approval, too. I don't think this is all that 
 different. --wunder
 
 On Jan 7, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
 
 This situation might contribute to the reasons we don't get continuous 
 product improvement on our
 Japanese radios the way we do from Elecraft.
 
 Cheers - Bill, AE6JV
 
 On 1/7/14 at 6:53 AM, ji1...@jarl.com wrote:
 
 We know the firmware of KX-3 is currently
 revised even now.
 JARD can never accept such a moving spec.
 machine.
 
 ---
 Bill Frantz| gets() remains as a monument | Periwinkle
 (408)356-8506  | to C's continuing support of | 16345 Englewood Ave
 www.pwpconsult.com | buffer overruns. | Los Gatos, CA 95032
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 --
 Walter Underwood
 wun...@wunderwood.org
 
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT
We've all got our copies of 47 CFR part 97 handy, right?  Every FCC 
licensee is supposed to have a copy of the rules for their radio service...


As best I can tell, in the U.S. there is no requirement for type 
acceptance for amateur radio transmitters, and as licensees in the 
Amateur Radio Service, we are solely responsible for our transmitted 
signals.


Commercially made receivers require type-acceptance under 47 CFR part 
15.  Manufactured or imported amplifiers must be certified, mainly 
insuring that they can't easily be used on Citizen's Band.


Transmitters do not require type acceptance or certification.  We as 
licensed amateur radio operators are free to build or modify our 
transmitters at will.


At least as far as I can tell.

Good thing, or homebrewers and kit builders would likely need to send 
their radios to be certified.


I don't know how other countries handle this, but maybe Japan has it right?

73 -- Lynn

On 1/7/2014 8:14 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:

Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality transmitters off the air in 
their country. That is a good thing.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Keith Onishi
 Transmitters do not require type acceptance or certification.  We as 
 licensed amateur radio operators are free to build or modify our 
 transmitters at will.


Here in Japan, it is different story. All transmitters must be certified by 
either JARD Technical Standard Certification Number or set-by-set assessment 
with either document or transmitter itself.
Japanese government applies the same principles for commercial stations to 
amateur stations with as much as flexibility within the principle. One such 
principle is that transmitter must be certified. So, whatever transmitter you 
have built or bought need to get certified before using for transmission

73 de JH3SIF, Keith

On 2014/01/08, at 13:49, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT k...@coldrockshotbrooms.com 
wrote:

 We've all got our copies of 47 CFR part 97 handy, right?  Every FCC licensee 
 is supposed to have a copy of the rules for their radio service...
 
 As best I can tell, in the U.S. there is no requirement for type acceptance 
 for amateur radio transmitters, and as licensees in the Amateur Radio 
 Service, we are solely responsible for our transmitted signals.
 
 Commercially made receivers require type-acceptance under 47 CFR part 15.  
 Manufactured or imported amplifiers must be certified, mainly insuring that 
 they can't easily be used on Citizen's Band.
 
 Transmitters do not require type acceptance or certification.  We as licensed 
 amateur radio operators are free to build or modify our transmitters at will.
 
 At least as far as I can tell.
 
 Good thing, or homebrewers and kit builders would likely need to send their 
 radios to be certified.
 
 I don't know how other countries handle this, but maybe Japan has it right?
 
 73 -- Lynn
 
 On 1/7/2014 8:14 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
 Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality transmitters off the air in 
 their country. That is a good thing.
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-07 Thread Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT

George,

Please feel free to cite the appropriate section from Title 47.

I may have missed something.

73 -- Lynn

On 1/7/2014 9:41 PM, george fritkin wrote:

Lynn, I think you need a little brushing-up on the FCC regs

George, W6GF



*From: * Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT k...@coldrockshotbrooms.com;
*To: * elecraft@mailman.qth.net;
*Subject: * Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification 
Number for K3 orK3X

*Sent: * Wed, Jan 8, 2014 4:49:24 AM

We've all got our copies of 47 CFR part 97 handy, right?  Every FCC
licensee is supposed to have a copy of the rules for their radio 
service...


As best I can tell, in the U.S. there is no requirement for type
acceptance for amateur radio transmitters, and as licensees in the
Amateur Radio Service, we are solely responsible for our transmitted
signals.

Commercially made receivers require type-acceptance under 47 CFR part
15.  Manufactured or imported amplifiers must be certified, mainly
insuring that they can't easily be used on Citizen's Band.

Transmitters do not require type acceptance or certification.  We as
licensed amateur radio operators are free to build or modify our
transmitters at will.

At least as far as I can tell.

Good thing, or homebrewers and kit builders would likely need to send
their radios to be certified.

I don't know how other countries handle this, but maybe Japan has it 
right?


73 -- Lynn

On 1/7/2014 8:14 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
 Just like the FCC, they try to keep poor-quality transmitters off 
the air in their country. That is a good thing.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net javascript:return

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-06 Thread Seiji Okumura

K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm

Oku / JK1KSB

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Nobis n7...@nobis.net

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 10:32 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 
orK3X




I am planning a trip to Kagoshima, Japan in a few months and am applying
for a reciprocal license to operate in Japan. Does anyone know if the K3
and/or K3X have JARD (The Japan Amateur Radio Development Association)
Technical Standard Certification Number? This is required for operation of
the rig in Japan when operating under a reciprocal license.

73,


Bob -  N7RJN



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-06 Thread Seiji Okumura

K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm

Oku / JK1KSB

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Nobis n7...@nobis.net

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 10:32 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 
orK3X




I am planning a trip to Kagoshima, Japan in a few months and am applying
for a reciprocal license to operate in Japan. Does anyone know if the K3
and/or K3X have JARD (The Japan Amateur Radio Development Association)
Technical Standard Certification Number? This is required for operation of
the rig in Japan when operating under a reciprocal license.

73,


Bob -  N7RJN



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-06 Thread Jim Brown

On 1/6/2014 9:01 AM, Seiji Okumura wrote:

K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm


And why do they not have such certification?

73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 orK3X

2014-01-06 Thread Seiji Okumura

And why do they not have such certification?


Probably I think that this is because Japanese importer and Elecraft do not 
apply to JARD for the examination with a certificate of K3.


Oku JK1KSB

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] JARD Technical Standard Certification Number for K3 
orK3X




On 1/6/2014 9:01 AM, Seiji Okumura wrote:

K3/K3X does not have Technical Standard Certification Number.
See http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/3_Application/A-3.htm


And why do they not have such certification?

73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html