Way before his time: that little ditty is ascribed to
Robert McCloskey, State Department spokesman, Vietnam war era.
Used by many since, like so many good sayings. Churchill was good at it
too.
David
G3UNA
Thank you Alan Greenspan!!
Doug
W6JD
-- Original message
In reply to a similar question at Dayton, Riley Hollingsworth
specifically addressed the legitimacy of hams using LSB on 20 meters and
above, and USB on 40 meters and below (with the possible exception of
160 meters which drew a laugh from the crowd). The convention
currently in use is
G'day,
snipo
So, if we are going to annoy someone, that means we can't do it?
What? Then we shouldn't be working on getting into space, that is likley
to annoy
someone... the folks that live there for one...
snipo
Too right. The surest sign that there is intelligent life out there is
that
Hi,
Had to throw my 2 cents worth in. Personally I would welcome a shift to USB
on the lower bands, but I am not very optimistic it will happen. With DSP,
adding LSB to any radio is practically without cost (example K3: nil (ALT is
required by some CW ops) except for a few engineering hours) so
Comments below.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Childers, N5GE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 12:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] USB on all bands ??
On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:33:38 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire
I had a PRC-74 for a good while and finally sold it as there was no LSB.
You're right about it not having LSB, Sandy. I've got an AN/PRC-74B
that I've never fired up, so I had forgotten that it should not have
been on my list of LSB-capable military sets. At least the 74B covers
20 meters (it
Try a CQ on the other sideband. Sure, most ops won't copy but those who
will might produce an interesting QSO.
If they have an Elecraft rig, it won't matter, since it covers both
sidebands.
And you might smoke out someone who has a rig that doesn't work on the other
sideband. Who knows, you
One time I heard a guy on 20m using LSB. I switched my rig over to
LSB, and we had a nice QSO. During the QSO, it turned out that he had
attended Ohio State University. Well, seeing as how I live in Ann
Arbor, MI (home of the University of MIchigan), I had a good chuckle
at his expense
On 5/25/2008 11:53 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
Try a CQ on the other sideband. Sure, most ops won't copy but those
who will might produce an interesting QSO.
If they have an Elecraft rig, it won't matter, since it covers both
sidebands.
IIRC the Hallicrafters rigs that I used 45 years ago
All my Drake rigs, T-4X(B,C) and TR-4C along with the R-4(ABC) work both
side bands on all bands. My Swan 240 doesn't, but it was a bare bones rig
when new. It covers 80 40 on lower and 20 on upper. They all use the 5 and
9 MC system.
Kurt W7QHD
Lyle Johnson wrote:
Anybody been around long enough to explain the theory behind the use of LSB
on the lower bands vs. USB higher up? What is the advantage to doing so?
This is a classic detective story, with more than the usual share of red
herrings!
Early filter rigs used 9 MHz crystal
Thank you for the clarifications Ian.
... All it needs to swap
sidebands is a few changes from + to - in the DSP code, and to link
that to the band selector. It's all done for us in the K3... but are you
*sure* you got those signs right, Lyle? :-)
I know you believe you understand what
on
the hundreds of watering holes on 75 meter AM for local operation before
the widespread popularity of 2 meters!
73,
Sandy W5TVW
- Original Message -
From: Jim Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:37 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] USB on all
Thank you Alan Greenspan!!
Doug
W6JD
-- Original message --
From: Lyle Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for the clarifications Ian.
... All it needs to swap
sidebands is a few changes from + to - in the DSP code, and to link
that to the band selector.
... I remember when I was
accused of trying to ruin packet radio by running that nasty TCP/IP
stuff over the air too. :-)
And see what happened? Not many people on packet 20 years later!
Now at least I know whose fault it is!
73,
Lyle KK7P
___
You know, there is nothing, legally or technically, preventing anyone
from running USB on the bands below 10MHz if that is what they really
want to do. I am sure it will annoy someone tho'. I remember when I
was accused of trying to ruin packet radio by running that nasty TCP/
IP stuff over
So, if we are going to annoy someone, that means we can't do it?
What? Then we shouldn't be working on getting into space, that is likley to
annoy
someone... the folks that live there for one... and I don't want to go any
further with that one
Or.. we don't want to go to the park
they would
fly the Confederate Flag as their symbol. Remember the Alamo!
Mike Scott - AE6WA
Tarzana, CA (DM04 / near LA)
K3-100 #508/ KX1 #1311
From: Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] USB on all bands
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] USB on all bands ??
You know, there is nothing, legally or technically, preventing anyone
from running USB on the bands
On Sat, 24 May 2008 20:33:38 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
True, Brian.
A few years ago a buddy and I were chatting on the air with our K2s
comparing the performance of the filters. As part of our testing we made
sure we had no adjacent frequency signals and then switched
- Original Message -
From: Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Dayton Discovery [OT]
.snip..
Indeed, one of the first things I expect to see is pressure on Hams to adopt
USB as the standard
It's been a LONG time now, but I think I can at least
give the basic idea of how lower and upper SSB on
individual bands came about.
Most of the early SSB rigs ... all HB, of course ... were
built around a BC-458 (?) command set TX who's VFO
covered a range just above(?) 40M
Some early
Anybody been around long enough to explain the theory behind the use of LSB
on the lower bands vs. USB higher up? What is the advantage to doing so?
Early filter rigs used 9 MHz crystal filters. With a 5.0 - 5.5 MHz VFO
(often from a surplus AN/ARC-5 or SCR-274N Command Set), you got 80 m
23 matches
Mail list logo