Raph Frank wrote:
If you mean the Droop proportionality criterion: no, it doesn't. Since no
reweighting is done in the first round, it elects the Condorcet winner then,
and that's incompatible with the DPC.
What about running the process for double the number of steps as there
are seats.
If
Good Morning, Kristofer
re: ... would be good for the petition to include information
about the level of the person who originated it.
My initial reaction to this suggestion was unfavorable, oddly, for the
very reason you thought it worthwhile; fear that petitions coming from
the lower
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so. Though I haven't investigated this method, I'm thinking
that since it uses a divisor method (Sainte-Laguë), there would be instances
where it breaks quota, just like ordinary Sainte-Laguë breaks
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The single-winner criterion corresponding to the DPC is the mutual majority
criterion. Any method that's Smith also passes mutual majority, and since
Condorcet is just the case of the Smith set being a singleton,
