[EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation vs simple representation.

2010-03-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Voting systems theory should properly be a subtopic within social choice theory, which is -- or should not be -- based on instantaneous process, as from a single ballot, but from the whole set of procedures whereby a community of interest discovers and makes choices. In small-group process,

Re: [EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation vs simple representation. (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax)

2010-03-13 Thread Kathy Dopp
Abd ul, I agree with virtually all you say that I had time to read, but would prefer party list voting over asset voting simply because it forces the #1 elector, as you put it, to state in advance who he will nominate with any excess votes and also in some systems gives the voters a chance to vote

Re: [EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation vs simple representation.

2010-03-13 Thread Michael Rouse
On 3/13/2010 11:53 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote (after I snipped a bit): Attempts have been made to apply this to public elections. I forget the city, but there was a proposal in the early 20th century to hold an election for a City Council where, in the council, representatives would

Re: [EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation vs simple representation. (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax)

2010-03-13 Thread Raph Frank
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Kathy Dopp kathy.d...@gmail.com wrote: Abd ul, I agree with virtually all you say that I had time to read, but would prefer party list voting over asset voting simply because it forces the #1 elector, as you put it, to state in advance who he will nominate with

Re: [EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation vssimple representation.

2010-03-13 Thread James Gilmour
Kathy Dopp Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 8:54 PM Abd ul, I agree with virtually all you say that I had time to read, but would prefer party list voting over asset voting simply because it forces the #1 elector, as you put it, to state in advance who he will nominate with any excess votes

Re: [EM] A monotonic proportional multiwinner method

2010-03-13 Thread Raph Frank
I wonder if this is equivalent to your method; assign seats to each coalition one at a time, using Sainte-lague, until there is only 1 coalition possible. From your first example: ABC (70): AB (24): AC (18): BC (28): A (14): B (12): C (27): Using Sainte-lague to distribute the seats: ABC-1: 70

Re: [EM] Voting systems theory and proportional representation vs simple representation. (Abd ul-Rahman Lomax)

2010-03-13 Thread Kathy Dopp
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Raph Frank raph...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Kathy Dopp kathy.d...@gmail.com wrote: Abd ul, I agree with virtually all you say that I had time to read, but would prefer party list voting over asset voting simply because it forces the #1