Good advice thanks. Last night I fought with random number generators,
looks like tonight I'm going to be doing the same with the JSON decoders.
And while I encourage you to create a GeoJSON decoder, I won't wait for
it...the point of this exercise is to learn, and it would be really
interes
On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 8:53:36 PM UTC-7, Max Goldstein wrote:
>
>
> Last night I fought with random number generators
>>
>
> Have you seen my library, mgold/elm-random-pcg? It doesn't solve the basic
> problem of "randomness is hard in a functional language" but it has better
> docs a
Hi all,
I have a moderately complicated JSON object. A sample looks like:
```
{
"118_192": {
"Cloverdale P": {
"sum_lane_miles": 0,
"sum_single_unit_mt": 0,
"sum_vmt": 57,
"sum_combination_mt": 0
}
}
}
```
Thousands of such top level entries, wit
Hi thanks. I was missing the Result library entirely!
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 12:04:14 AM UTC-7, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> When you do something that can fail in some way, Elm gives you back a type
> that has the failure covered so that you can treat it properly.
> The two most frequentl
...
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 12:04:14 AM UTC-7, Peter Damoc wrote:
...
> You can read more in the Error handling section of the guide:
> https://guide.elm-lang.org/error_handling/
>
>
>
I read that on my first pass through the guide, and just re-read it. What
I don't see in there is
Slowly climbing up the Elm learning curve, I made it crash runtime
yesterday, and I just wanted to report to the mailing list. This may be a
known issue, but as a novice I'm making all kinds of rookie mistakes. As
such, when those rookie mistakes cause a runtime crash without a compiler
compl
On Friday, September 30, 2016 at 12:46:25 PM UTC-7, Noah Hall wrote:
>
> This is a known issue. See this ->
> https://github.com/elm-lang/elm-compiler/issues/873
>
> Sorry for the noise then.
> It will be fixed in 0.18.
>
>
Oh cool. I'll read up on the fix and see how it was/will be done.
Hi,
I'm climbing the Elm learning curve, and just now hit a compiler complaint
that I was giving a function a number when it wanted an Int.
So I reached for a documentation page with the standard list of built-in
types...and couldn't find it.
It would be great if there was a link on the main d
Also, while I am bothering all of you seasoned Elm pros, I just started
using Array today because I needed to access numbered elements in a list.
It took me a while before I "discovered" Array, rather than List.
I noticed that on the javascript comparison page
(http://elm-lang.org/docs/from
Thanks for the reply...
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 4:36:47 AM UTC-7, Wouter In t Velt wrote:
>
> The comparison page you refer to is more a high-level comparison between
> javascript and elm syntax.
> It does not look like it is intended to be in-depth.
>
> I agree it would be useful to have
10 matches
Mail list logo
