Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-10-03 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2018-10-03, at 12:51, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I attach a patch with a more verbose docstring. >> >> It is perhaps still not ideal - in particular, the warning is not >> visible in the Customize interface - but I do not think this is a big >> deal.

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-10-03 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Marcin Borkowski writes: > I attach a patch with a more verbose docstring. > > It is perhaps still not ideal - in particular, the warning is not > visible in the Customize interface - but I do not think this is a big > deal. My line of thinking is that: > > - if a user wants to change

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-10-02 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2018-09-06, at 16:18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I decided to put a warning about this in the docstring in my patch. My >> assumption was that this is enough. If a user wants to change the >> default, he will most probably see the docstring and will

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-09-08 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2018-09-06, at 16:18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I decided to put a warning about this in the docstring in my patch. My >> assumption was that this is enough. If a user wants to change the >> default, he will most probably see the docstring and will

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-09-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Marcin Borkowski writes: > I decided to put a warning about this in the docstring in my patch. My > assumption was that this is enough. If a user wants to change the > default, he will most probably see the docstring and will have to > actively ignore the warning. I don't think this

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-09-06 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2018-09-02, at 16:50, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > On 2018-09-02, at 14:45, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Marcin Borkowski writes: >> >>> I attach a trivial patch fixing a very annoying cap on >>> org-clock-history. (I want to set org-clock-history to 120.) >> >> According to

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-09-02 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2018-09-02, at 14:45, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I attach a trivial patch fixing a very annoying cap on >> org-clock-history. (I want to set org-clock-history to 120.) > > According to 7972356d092736af06282a09f008c2b5f938134d and >

Re: [O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-09-02 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Marcin Borkowski writes: > I attach a trivial patch fixing a very annoying cap on > org-clock-history. (I want to set org-clock-history to 120.) According to 7972356d092736af06282a09f008c2b5f938134d and 77f1f31c99f521751dc0b57f9923773e97644bb5, this limits selection to standard

[O] How about lifting the limit of 35 tasks in org-clock-history?

2018-08-30 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Hi all, I attach a trivial patch fixing a very annoying cap on org-clock-history. (I want to set org-clock-history to 120.) Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://mbork.pl >From 10de3a12ebbad820fb86dc6924f17d701d4f9620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcin Borkowski Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:53:42