Hello,
Andreas Leha writes:
> Grant Rettke writes:
>> Good evening,
>>
>> My goal is to obtain the following behavior in org mode for a document:
>> 1) Report an error if there is a source block without a language
>>specified
>> 2) Report an error if there is a source block with a language
Kit-Yan Choi writes:
> But is it theoretically possible to have two remote file paths sharing
> the same local copy file name? i.e. `make-temp-file' generates the
> same temporary file name for two separate calls?
No, never ever. After choosing a random file name, make-temp-file checks
whether t
On 2014-11-29, at 04:48, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo wrote:
> If you decide to go with LaTeX, the reason to split your
> dissertation in several chapters is so that the compilation can
> run faster, since when you change a chapter and compile only that
> chapter is compiled again. This is a subst
Dear Org maintainers,
I was using Org to write a software manual with a structure along the
lines of:
* Equations
How to write equations in software FOO.
* Footnotes
How to write footnotes in software FOO.
* Images
How to insert images in software FOO.
When I exported the document (to
Hello,
Is it ok to apply the attached patch? I don't want to break anything.
I want to be able to denote my source blocks like so:
- *~* is the mark,
- *|* is the point
#+begin_src elisp
(~a b c| d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z)
#+end_src
- `org-edit-special' will automatically t
Hello,
Arni Magnusson writes:
> I was using Org to write a software manual with a structure along the
> lines of:
>
>
> * Equations
>
> How to write equations in software FOO.
>
> * Footnotes
>
> How to write footnotes in software FOO.
>
> * Images
>
> How to insert images in software FOO.
>
>
>
Hello,
Oleh writes:
> I want to be able to denote my source blocks like so:
>
> - *~* is the mark,
> - *|* is the point
>
> #+begin_src elisp
> (~a b c| d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z)
> #+end_src
>
> - `org-edit-special' will automatically transform this markup into an
> actual a
Hi Nicolas,
> I don't understand what your use-case is. Note that `org-edit-special'
> already preserves region.
That's good, but not what I need. I want to go from an unmarked region
in an org file with markup
to a marked region without markup in the *Org Src* buffer.
I've defined a custom `org
>> I don't understand what your use-case is. Note that `org-edit-special'
>> already preserves region.
>
> That's good, but not what I need. I want to go from an unmarked region
> in an org file with markup
> to a marked region without markup in the *Org Src* buffer.
That still doesn't explain why
>>> I don't understand what your use-case is. Note that `org-edit-special'
>>> already preserves region.
>>
>> That's good, but not what I need. I want to go from an unmarked region
>> in an org file with markup
>> to a marked region without markup in the *Org Src* buffer.
>
> That still doesn't ex
What a treat, sir, thank you for sharing that as if by some delightful
magic, which surely it indeed is.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Grant Rettke writes:
>>> Good evening,
>>>
>>> My goal is to obtain the following behavior in o
Hi Henry,
Henry Hirsch writes:
> So how can org mode support wrapping sections in html?
> Especially for more complex cases where a section or
> multiple sections will be wrapped in multiple divs.
You can do this with an export filter or filters. See the "Advanced
Configuration" section in the
Marcin Borkowski writes:
I mostly agree, but the above is not true: see TeX-pin-region
and TeX-command-region. Bottom line: IMHO no point in dividing
into many files.
You are right, you can compile a region in AUCTeX, or export just
a region in org, but the problem (besides having to select
Sure.
I suggest inserting a short paragraph into section 2.2, both in the manual
and the compact guide. Working from today's snapshot of the repository,
the two patches are as follows.
$ diff org-before.texi org-after.texi
1212c1212,1217
< @noindent Some people find the many stars too noisy
The location of the second patch (in orgguide.texi) is line 348:
348c348,351
Arni
-- Forwarded message --
Sure.
I suggest inserting a short paragraph into section 2.2, both in the manual
and the compact guide. Working from today's snapshot of the repository,
the two patche
Grant Rettke writes:
> What a treat, sir, thank you for sharing that as if by some delightful
> magic, which surely it indeed is.
Many thanks also from my side!
>
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Andreas Leha writes:
>>
>>> Grant Rettke writes:
>>>
On 2014-11-24, at 19:38, Rasmus wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm writing (in Org) a text on Emacs usage. How to
>> correctly/canonically represent keystrokes, like "C-x RET f"?
>> Currently, I use =C-x RET f=; are there any alternatives?
>
> That's what I'd do. Or ~C-x R
On 2014-11-29, at 22:53, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> On 2014-11-24, at 19:38, Rasmus wrote:
>
>> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm writing (in Org) a text on Emacs usage. How to
>>> correctly/canonically represent keystrokes, like "C-x RET f"?
>>> Currently, I use =C-x RET f=; ar
On 2014-11-29, at 18:30, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
>> I mostly agree, but the above is not true: see TeX-pin-region
>> and TeX-command-region. Bottom line: IMHO no point in dividing
>> into many files.
>
> You are right, you can compile a region in AUCTeX, or
hi nicolas,
you asked for a reproducible recipe. here it is. i have limited
vertical real estate so i hope this can be fixed! is it an emacs bug
or an org bug?
run this (after substituting in where you keep org maint) and search
for "lightly org":
thanks.
samuel
=== call
emacs -Q --geometr
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> On 2014-11-24, at 19:38, Rasmus wrote:
>
>> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm writing (in Org) a text on Emacs usage. How to
>>> correctly/canonically represent keystrokes, like "C-x RET f"?
>>> Currently, I use =C-x RET f=; are there any alternatives
21 matches
Mail list logo