Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual

2013-03-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.3.2013, at 07:54, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> I tried the file on github, and export to texinfo fails with the >> attached backtrace (exports to other backends as well). > > Works for me. > >> I love this idea, so I really want to

Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual

2013-03-16 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.3.2013, at 02:19, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Hi Achim, > > Achim Gratz writes: > >> Hi Tom, >> >> I'm playing around with the current version, here is what I have so far: >> >> >> The arguments to #+attr_texinfo need to lose the double quotes >> >> Index entries in description lists mus

Re: [O] Indentation of backend definitioon

2013-03-15 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 14.3.2013, at 23:32, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I propose the following patch to improve the automatic >> indentation of the backend definition macros in ox.el. >> >> - Carsten >> >> diff --git a/l

Re: [O] posting guide?

2013-03-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 14.3.2013, at 20:53, Jay Kerns wrote: > Reading my message again, it doesn't say what I wanted it to say, and > it sounds in my head not in the way I wanted it to sound. Let me try > again, with more words: > > That's totally fine by me, I meant it when I said "OK if you don't > want to do

Re: [O] posting guide?

2013-03-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13 mrt. 2013, at 22:07, Jay Kerns wrote: > Dear Bastien, > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Bastien wrote: >> Hi Jay, > >> Well, I would not invest too much time on this, personally. > > No, you don't seem to be bothered at all; those attacks seem to > wash off you like water off a d

[O] Indentation of backend definitioon

2013-03-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Nicolas, I propose the following patch to improve the automatic indentation of the backend definition macros in ox.el. - Carsten diff --git a/lisp/ox.el b/lisp/ox.el index c5b6d7c..31983b2 100644 --- a/lisp/ox.el +++ b/lisp/ox.el @@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ keywords are understood: ',expo

Re: [O] Copyright of contributions to org-mode

2013-03-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13 mrt. 2013, at 13:35, Andreas Röhler wrote: > Am 13.03.2013 13:10, schrieb Bastien: >> Andreas Röhler writes: >> >>> Or maybe drop that sentence. >> >> Nope: the whole purpose of clarifying is to make it clear what are >> the licensing terms, when the assignement is needed, and what are

Re: [O] Copyright of contributions to org-mode

2013-03-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13 mrt. 2013, at 12:12, Andreas Röhler wrote: > Am 13.03.2013 11:50, schrieb Carsten Dominik: >> Dar all, >> >> in the light of the recent dispute, I have now added the >> paragraph below to >> >> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.htm

Re: [O] Copyright of contributions to org-mode

2013-03-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13 mrt. 2013, at 12:13, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > > > Da: Carsten Dominik > >> Inviato: Mercoledì 13 Marzo 2013 11:50 > > Hi, Carsten, >> you are placing these changes > >> under GPL version 3, > >> with > > > shouldn'

[O] Copyright of contributions to org-mode

2013-03-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
Dar all, in the light of the recent dispute, I have now added the paragraph below to http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#sec-2 to clarify the copyright implications of submitting contributions to org-mode. I hope this helps to avoid problems in the future. Regards - Carsten By su

Re: [O] Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was: Editing folded headlines and ellipses)

2013-03-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 12.3.2013, at 15:21, Bastien wrote: > Hi Darlan, > > Mhh... yes, I see. > > I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits' > but I'd like to know what other contributors think. > > So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be? I think the default shoul

Re: [O] ox-html.el removal

2013-03-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 11.3.2013, at 05:08, Jambunathan K wrote: > > Even if my combative positioning doesn't amount to anything much, I want > to throw in a little friction by the way of Bastien and the current > release. I am stating my purpose in no uncertain terms - yes it is to > delay the release or cause co

Re: [O] GFDL

2013-03-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 9.3.2013, at 16:25, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> I still think it is crazy to add these 8 pages to each time someone prints >> it > > It fits on exactly two pages (or front and back of one page) if wrapped in > > \begin{multicols}{2} >

Re: [O] GFDL

2013-03-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 9.3.2013, at 16:02, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> I am wondering, are we required to include the full text of the GFDL >> in the manual? I find it a big waste of space and feed that a link >> should do. But I have not been able to find the rules that

Re: [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft)

2013-03-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 9.3.2013, at 15:42, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On 9.3.2013, at 11:52, Waldemar Quevedo wrote: >> >>> Hey Nicolas, this looks very detailed and I think it could be useful >>> for people trying to write

[O] GFDL

2013-03-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, I am wondering, are we required to include the full text of the GFDL in the manual? I find it a big waste of space and feed that a link should do. But I have not been able to find the rules that say what needs to be included in a document distributed under GFDL? Thanks - Carsten

Re: [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft)

2013-03-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 9.3.2013, at 11:52, Waldemar Quevedo wrote: > Hey Nicolas, this looks very detailed and I think it could be useful > for people trying to write other parsers implementations for org-mode. > Thanks for sharing! Maybe someone knowledgeable can turn Nicola's description into a formal parser de

Re: [O] Link colours in new Worg style

2013-03-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 9.3.2013, at 11:06, Bastien wrote: > Hi Suvayu, > > Suvayu Ali writes: > >> I don't know why I did not notice that before! Maybe this time I was >> browsing around, checking things whereas earlier I knew which entry I >> was looking for. In any case, it is less confusing after the >> swi

Re: [O] [RFC] Org syntax (draft)

2013-03-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
woow, this is awesome Nicolas, thank you! - Carsten On 7.3.2013, at 21:37, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > As discussed a few days ago, here is a document describing the complete > Org syntax as read by the parser. I also added some comments. I am going > to put the Org file on Worg, s

Re: [O] Agenda optimization (new worg page and new defaults)

2013-03-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Bastien, I think this is the right decision, thanks. And thanks for the nice documentation! Tis might deserve a spot in the manual, in the final chapter. Cheers - Carsten On 6 mrt. 2013, at 10:45, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > I wrote a worg page with some advice on how to speed up

[O] Avdi Grimm on Org-mode in an interview by Sacha Chua

2013-03-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, Avdi Grimm has nice things to say about Org-mode, in particular as an authoring tool, and in particular as an authoring tool for a book with lots of code examples. It seems like he wrote books like his "Exceptional Ruby" using Org-mode. Big ad for exporter and Babel. sachachua.com/blog/2013

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-03-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
OK, great. - Carsten On 4.3.2013, at 15:45, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >>> Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities? >> >> That would be the alternative, right. Do you think this would be >> preferr

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-03-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.2.2013, at 22:10, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> >>> Carsten Dominik writes: >>> >>>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to &g

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-28 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to >> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this. > > AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-28 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.2.2013, at 11:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> OK, I pushed this change, maybe it is good if you have a brief look, >> Nicolas. > > Thanks for the patch. It looks good. I have one minor suggestion, > though. In

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-28 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.2.2013, at 09:39, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 27.2.2013, at 16:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires >>> that I study the ui interface a bit more. &

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-28 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 27.2.2013, at 16:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires >> that I study the ui interface a bit more. > > I think the only pieces of the UI involved are `org-export-dispatch

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-27 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the >> previous export action, that is extremely useful. >> >> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I &

Re: [O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-27 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 27.2.2013, at 09:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the >> previous export action, that is extremely useful. >> >> I often only export a subtree of a document, and I &

[O] Exporter interface question

2013-02-27 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, I have a question about the exporter dispatcher. I much appreciate that `C-u C-c C-e' repeats the previous export action, that is extremely useful. I often only export a subtree of a document, and I was wondering if others would also find this proposal useful: When exporting a subtree, lets

Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual

2013-02-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Tom, wow, a daring project. This would indeed be a testimony to the quality of the exporter if this works and gives proper output! I am curious and looking forward to seeing the results. - Carsten On 25.2.2013, at 21:21, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Aloha all, > > An experiment to see if it

Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25 feb. 2013, at 10:28, Bastien wrote: > Hi François, > > sorting list items and headlines is now done against the visible > part of the item and headlines, i.e., it ignores hidden links and > emphasis markers. Hi Bastien, are you sure it removes emphasis markers as well? Looks to me that

Re: [O] org-fill-paragraph leaves point at end of table

2013-02-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25 feb. 2013, at 10:10, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Calling `org-fill-paragraph' inside a table leaves point at the end of >> the table, for reasons that are totally unclear to me. >> >> I've tested this with up-to-date org and emacs -Q, so I'm hoping

Re: [O] One-keystroke command to move blocks of text up and down

2013-02-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 24.2.2013, at 16:53, Susan Cragin wrote: > I use Meta-up-arrow and Meta-down-arrow to move headings in org and entries > in spreadsheets. > Would like to be able to use the same or similar command to move blocks of > text up or down. > The current solution--highlight then kill/yank--is ju

Re: [O] Exporter question

2013-02-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 24.2.2013, at 15:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I am curious why you chose the name "optional_title" for the property? >> Why not, for example "TOC_TITLE" or something like this? > > See http://permalink.gmane.org/g

Re: [O] Exporter question

2013-02-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Nicolas, I am curious why you chose the name "optional_title" for the property? Why not, for example "TOC_TITLE" or something like this? - Carsten On 24.2.2013, at 09:55, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On 12.2.

Re: [O] [Feature Request] Cross headings in tables

2013-02-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 22.2.2013, at 21:33, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >>> I think the cleanest way to implement this would be to _not_ modify Org >>> syntax, because it is export back-end very specific. Something like: >>> >>> #+attr_html: :hea

Re: [O] [Feature Request] Cross headings in tables

2013-02-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17 feb. 2013, at 09:35, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Achim Gratz writes: > >> I've just looked at how to implement this using org-element and the >> new exporter. Much to my dismay I found that table headers are not >> a separate row or row group type and the new exporter is still u

Re: [O] Offer for taking over maintainership

2013-02-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi everyone, may I suggest that we dry up this thread and the related threads? It seems to me that what needed to be said has been said and we should stop providing an arena for a monologue that has become full OT by now. - Carsten

Re: [O] Exporter question

2013-02-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 12.2.2013, at 20:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > "Dominik, Carsten" writes: > >> In a file with some time stamps in headlines, is it still possible to >> get rid of them only for the Table of Contents, but to leave them in >> the headlines themselves? > > Good question. You can pr

Re: [O] time stamps in table of contents

2013-02-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
Yes, thank you everyone for replying, this indeed works. - Carsten On 12 feb. 2013, at 10:59, Bastien wrote: > > > "Sebastien Vauban" > writes: > >> Don't you forget the `.' in front of timestamp, for the "class" >> spec? > > Yes > > #table-of-contents .timestamp { > display:non

Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD

2013-02-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 12 feb. 2013, at 15:04, Jambunathan K wrote: > Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala writes: > >> Though I don't want to quantify, here is one data point, > > Graphs are wonderful and colorful. The key thing is it's irrelevant. > How about creating a graph that shows commit to the org-element.el and >

Re: [O] time stamps in table of contents

2013-02-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
OK, thank you! - Carsten On 12 feb. 2013, at 12:41, Bastien wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I am dumber than you think, how exactly would I do this? Add an >> exclamation mark? Where? > > This should do: > > #table-of-contents .timestamp { &

Re: [O] time stamps in table of contents

2013-02-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 12 feb. 2013, at 11:35, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: >> #table-of-contents timestamp { >> display:none; >> } > > You want a class selector (".") there, not an ID selector ("#"). Also you > should probab

[O] time stamps in table of contents

2013-02-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, this is a question for CSS experts. I am trying to get rid of time stamps in HTML export. So I am using a CSS file which contains among other things: #table-of-contents { font-size: 100%; position: fixed; display: block; left: 10px; top: 164px;

Re: [O] New exporter macro question

2013-02-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hello Nicolas, thanks for your reply. I now remember this point of downgrading the macros and replacing complex macro calls with babel code. Thanks also for the easy work-around. - Carsten On 11.2.2013, at 22:37, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: &

Re: [O] New exporter macro question

2013-02-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 11 feb. 2013, at 13:48, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > Hi, > > I am porting my websites to the new exporter, finally. Much is very smooth. > I do have a problem with macros: > > > * Macro definition > > > #+MACRO: thumbright #+ATTR_HTML: style="f

[O] New exporter macro question

2013-02-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, I am porting my websites to the new exporter, finally. Much is very smooth. I do have a problem with macros: * Macro definition #+MACRO: thumbright #+ATTR_HTML: style="float:right;width:$1;margin:0px 20px 0px 20px;" \n [[./Content/$2/thumb.jpg]] * Macro call {{{thumbrig

Re: [O] orgstruct-mode with custom headline prefix

2013-02-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Christopher, I have trouble applying it, can you please send the patch as an attachments instead of inline, and make sure it is agains the current master? Thanks. - Carsten On 31 jan. 2013, at 21:06, Christopher Schmidt wrote: > Bastien writes: >> PS: To make things clear: I'm confident

Re: [O] ...

2013-01-31 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 31 jan. 2013, at 14:32, Bastien wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > thanks a lot for the very clear explanations. > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> The difference is only the repeated concatenation operation, and not the >> recompilation. I always thought that this wo

Re: [O] ...

2013-01-31 Thread Carsten Dominik
now seems that it would only be a minor impact. Still, I think making a local variable in buffers with org-struct-mode is also a good way to get the functionality Christopher wants. Clearer? - Carsten On 31 jan. 2013, at 12:22, Bastien wrote: > Hi Carsten and Christopher, > > Car

Re: [O] ...

2013-01-31 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Christopher, I mant to copy the list, I am doing this again now. Wow, I was not aware that Emacs caches by content, this is an important piece of information. I guess this removed the main concern I had. Thanks for looking it up in the code and showing it to me. I am not sure if I underst

Re: [O] Agenda optimization: new option `org-agenda-inhibit-startup'

2013-01-30 Thread Carsten Dominik
Great, I am happy. - Carsten On 30 jan. 2013, at 11:21, Bastien wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> Maybe it would be useful to exempt initializing org-indent-mode from >> this. > > I double-checked and (setq org-startup-indented t) does not

Re: [O] [PATCH] fix polluting minibuffer-local-map

2013-01-27 Thread Carsten Dominik
Ouch what a bad bug. Thanks for finding it Leo! - Carsten On 27.1.2013, at 09:31, Leo Liu wrote: > a/org.el > b/org.el > @@ -15578,57 +15578,57 @@ > (defvar org-read-date-minibuffer-local-map > (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap))) > (set-keymap-parent map minibuffer-local-map) > -(org-d

Re: [O] Agenda optimization: new option `org-agenda-inhibit-startup'

2013-01-27 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Bastien, yes, this will lead to a speedup of the first agenda in an Emacs session. Once the buffers have been pulled in, this should not make a difference anymore. Maybe it would be useful to exempt initializing org-indent-mode from this. I think (Nicolas?) that this will cost no time as l

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.1.2013, at 16:47, Nick Dokos wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> ... >>> I tried with my agenda which calls org-agenda-skip 5768 times. Without >>> the mod, they took 0

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On 17.1.2013, at 06:02, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> ... >>> It sets p to the point at the beginning of the line and then >>> checks if the character after it is &#

Re: [O] commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda.

2013-01-16 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 17.1.2013, at 06:02, Nick Dokos wrote: > Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Rainer Stengele wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Imagine you have a todo like this: >>> >>> * TODO a task >>> SCHEDULED: <2013-01-16 Mi +2m> >>> >>> Now suppose you want to put that todo on hold. In order to no more see

Re: [O] Automagically send all org table

2013-01-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 14 jan. 2013, at 11:25, Xavier Garrido wrote: > Hi orgmoders, > > I am looking for a simple way to SEND all org tables in a given document to > their RECEIVER counterparts. Of course, I can go through the whole document > and do `org-table-send` one-by-one but I would like to do it without

Re: [O] Remove filename from agenda view?

2013-01-03 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 4.1.2013, at 06:28, Nick Dokos wrote: > Boyan Penkov wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In the default agenda view (C-c a), the leftmost column is the org-mode file >> name from which the given item stems. However, I use a single file for all >> my actionables, and would like to eliminate this co

Re: [O] Keybinding discrepency

2013-01-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 1.1.2013, at 19:25, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Hello, > > In speed keys, the ';' key is bound to "set tags". In the agenda view, > ';' is bound to some timer function, and it's ':' that is bound to "set > tags". Should they be consistent? I would say yes, this would be useful to have consistent.

Re: [O] orgtbl-mode and markdown

2012-12-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
OK, I withdraw my opposition to fixing this issue in org - by my criticism toward the way markdown.el defines this hook remains. - Carsten On 20 dec. 2012, at 09:01, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 18.12.2012, at 18:56, Achim Gratz wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >&g

Re: [O] Adding tags when capturing?

2012-12-20 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 20.12.2012, at 09:30, Alan Schmitt wrote: > Bastien writes: > >> Hi Alan, >> >> Alan Schmitt writes: >> >>> Is there a shortcut to add tags when doing a capture? C-c C-c obviously >>> does not work. >> >> C-c C-q > > Thanks a lot! > > Is there a way to set-up the capture buffer so that

Re: [O] orgtbl-mode and markdown

2012-12-20 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 18.12.2012, at 18:56, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> Well this is very safe - but if you have to assume that every elisp >> command does change match data behind your back, you would have to >> create a lot of extra code. > > Stefan Monnier advis

Re: [O] orgtbl-mode and markdown

2012-12-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 18 dec. 2012, at 14:39, Vegard Vesterheim wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:07:36 +0100 Carsten Dominik > wrote: > >> On 18 dec. 2012, at 09:33, Vegard Vesterheim >> wrote: >> >>> I had problems editing tables (using the minor mode orgtbl-mode)

Re: [O] orgtbl-mode and markdown

2012-12-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 18 dec. 2012, at 09:33, Vegard Vesterheim wrote: > I had problems editing tables (using the minor mode orgtbl-mode) in > markdown files. > > To reproduce: > - visit an empty buffer in markdown mode > - M-x orgtbl-mode > - create a new table (C-c |) > - try to edit a cell > - observe that

Re: [O] [new exporter] what is the label syntax for LaTeX export?

2012-11-05 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 5 nov. 2012, at 23:18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Myles English writes: > >> If my org file has: >> >> #+CAPTION[Here is a table]: A nice table >> #+NAME: tab:niceone >> | a | >> >> Look at my \ref{tab:niceone}. >> >> then M-x org-export-dispatch l L gives me: >> >> \begin

Re: [O] Setting Tags Using #+INCLUDE:

2012-10-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Ian, you need to use #+setupfile instead of #+include for this purpose. - Carsten On 22 okt. 2012, at 14:39, Ian Barton wrote: > I have tags defined in my .emacs using setq org-tag-alist. However, I have a > group of files (>100) for which I want to define a different set of tags. > Rathe

Re: [O] Bug: org-read-date: problem with year in dotted european date input [7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-436-g9b11e6 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)]

2012-10-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
I fixed the documentation. - Carsten On 14.10.2012, at 09:57, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> Org used to have the ambition to parse a date in the middle of a text, >> and this six what you are seeing in the documentation. However, ov

Re: [O] Bug: org-read-date: problem with year in dotted european date input [7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-436-g9b11e6 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)]

2012-10-13 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13 okt. 2012, at 20:45, Gregor Zattler wrote: > Hi Nicolas, org-mode users and developers, > * Nicolas Goaziou [13. Oct. 2012]: >> Gregor Zattler writes: >> >>> Back to square one: Does anybody know How to customise >>> Emacs/org-mode so that dotted European dates are parsed correctly >>> at

Re: [O] fontifying superscript/subscript

2012-10-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 13.10.2012, at 08:04, Benjamin Slade wrote: > Is there a way to have org-mode fontify superscript/subscript the way > that AUCTeX does? C-c C-x \ > > (A second, but related, question---especially assuming that the answer > to the first question may be "no"---is there any straightforward way

Re: [O] C-c ^ for plain lists? Why not?

2012-10-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 8.10.2012, at 20:25, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > James Harkins writes: > >> I've started to like checklists because they are a good way to keep >> account of things that have to be done, without the individual items >> being entered into the agenda (and thus transferred to MobileOrg

Re: [O] Problem: Moving rows in a table changes vsum start and end

2012-09-29 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 29.9.2012, at 12:11, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >> I did have a look, and it is very difficult to fix, unfortunately. If >> I find enough time, I will rewrite the whole range parser, but that is >> totally non-trivial. Sorry about that. > > Th

Re: [O] Problem: Moving rows in a table changes vsum start and end

2012-09-29 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 29.9.2012, at 11:57, Achim Gratz wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: >>> I just pushed this: Org now sends a message when the formulas >>> have been updated. Something less intrusive like a temporary >>> overlay would be nice, though. > >> Thorsten, if

Re: [O] [PATCH] speedup redisplay of agenda item after change

2012-09-29 Thread Carsten Dominik
Looks great, and I see no reasons why this should break anything. - Carsten On 28.9.2012, at 19:01, Max Mikhanosha wrote: > I had noticed that with large agendas (several hundred items), any > command that changes and re-displays the current item is slow. For > example something like changing pr

Re: [O] Problem: Moving rows in a table changes vsum start and end

2012-09-29 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 28.9.2012, at 18:00, Bastien wrote: > Hi Torsten, > > Torsten Wagner writes: > >> I might start very very simple and hope you are wiling enough to help >> me to translate whatever mess I send you into some reasonable patch ;) > > I just pushed this: Org now sends a message when the formula

Re: [O] Breadcrumbs?

2012-09-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25.9.2012, at 14:48, Bastien wrote: > > > "Sebastien Vauban" > writes: > >> Could we imagine the displayed outline path to be separated by " / " instead >> of by "/", that is: > > From current master, try this out: > > (org-display-outline-path nil t " - ") Hi everyone, I just change

Re: [O] org-metaup / org-metadown nerfed in 7.9.1

2012-09-23 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 23.9.2012, at 10:25, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Bastien writes: > >> Hi Anthony, >> >> Anthony Lander writes: >> >>> I use the M-up/dn behaviour a lot to move property lines up and down. >> >> Maybe each property line could be a new element recognized as such by >> org-element.

Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user

2012-09-23 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 23.9.2012, at 10:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On 22.9.2012, at 10:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >>> If the LaTeX command doesn't require an argument, you can always add it >>> to `org-entities-user'. >

Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user

2012-09-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 22.9.2012, at 10:52, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> The only thing is: I do use Org to draft documents intended to >> be later fine-tuned as LaTeX documents, while I don't usually >> do this for other backends. So t

Re: [O] Visibility cycling with inline tasks

2012-09-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
GReat, thanks! - Carsten On 22.9.2012, at 11:02, Bastien wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I agree that this would be a good default, but not with a hard-coded 6. >> >> (add-hook 'org-cycle-hook >> (lambda (state) (when (eq

Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user

2012-09-20 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 20 sep. 2012, at 13:57, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> maybe first have to get clear what you mean by "not accepting raw commands". >> Would that mean that if I write \vspace in the buffer, the LaTeX exporter >> w

Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user

2012-09-20 Thread Carsten Dominik
arsten On 19 sep. 2012, at 17:55, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> These are all valid arguments. However, I did design >> Org-mode to be LaTeX-near to make sure that it becomes >> easy and fast to type as a notes environment

Re: [O] Problem with org-entities-user

2012-09-19 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 19 sep. 2012, at 15:15, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> I'm not sure about support for \hfill{}, etc. The new latex and html >> exporters pass \hfill{} through unchanged, which might be what the latex >> author wants, or what the html author

Re: [O] Visibility cycling with inline tasks

2012-09-19 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 19 sep. 2012, at 12:34, Bastien wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Christopher Witte writes: > >> I have a document with lots of inline tasks scattered throughout it. I >> want to get an overview of the document so I use S- to cycle to >> CONTENTS, when I do that all of the inline tasks are disp

Re: [O] Compilation problem

2012-09-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 18.9.2012, at 15:22, Bastien wrote: > Hi Jambunathan, > > Jambunathan K writes: > >> Please ask for clarification and politely indicate that a change may >> have to be reverted. > > Sorry that I reverted this one too hastily and without warning. > >> Instead of the commit being wrong, i

Re: [O] Quickly fold/unfold a node

2012-09-12 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 12.9.2012, at 08:16, Giacomo M wrote: > Dear Emacs Orgmode users, > I would like to quickly go from FOLDED to CHILDREN to FOLDED skipping the > SUBTREE step in the visibility cycle (especially for the cases when CHILDREN > and SUBTREE are the same). Pressing TAB twice. :) Sounds stupid, bu

Re: [O] org-pretty-entities and org-cdlatex

2012-09-05 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 5.9.2012, at 12:20, Thomas Holst wrote: > Hello, > > · Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> On 5.9.2012, at 11:08, Thomas Holst wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> there is a different behaviour of sub (_) and superscripts (^) depending >>&

Re: [O] org-pretty-entities and org-cdlatex

2012-09-05 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 5.9.2012, at 11:08, Thomas Holst wrote: > Hello, > > there is a different behaviour of sub (_) and superscripts (^) depending > on =org-pretty-entities=. When I type: > > =ab_cdef= > > inside LaTeX fragments with =org-pretty-entities= enabled I get: > > \( ab_{c}def \) > >

Re: [O] Any way to change the *

2012-09-02 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 2.9.2012, at 10:07, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes: > >> Oh, indeed -- the face is simply the font settings, the overlay has more >> display flexibility (i.e images), right? > > Yes. For example, that's how LaTeX fragment preview (C-c C-x C-l) is > done.

Re: [O] Best way to implement project specific captures

2012-08-23 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Sylvain and Bastien, this is an interesting idea! I am wondering if the following feature would be useful as well: Context sensitivity sounds most interesting to me if the same key would do different things in different contexts. I am not sure if this is possible with the current implemen

Re: [O] GNU Emacs ported to Android

2012-08-23 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 23 aug. 2012, at 08:04, Bastien wrote: > Hi Torsten, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I think speed keys http://orgmode.org/manual/Speed-keys.html#Speed-keys >> will already go a long way to make Org-mode usable on an Emacs with >> no or limited modifier supp

Re: [O] GNU Emacs ported to Android

2012-08-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 23.8.2012, at 03:00, Torsten Wagner wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > I guess many many people here are looking since a long time how to run > a full version of org-mode on a mobile device. > Thus, I believe the announcement itself was well placed. > If we can keep the discussion towards how org-mode

Re: [O] Org Agenda - revert all agenda files?

2012-07-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 25 jul 2012, at 17:39, Nick Dokos wrote: > >> ... >> On the OP's question, I'd prefer a more targeted solution: something >> like this should work (very lightly tested - check the doc for >> revert-without-query if

Re: [O] Org Agenda - revert all agenda files?

2012-07-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25 jul 2012, at 17:39, Nick Dokos wrote: > Christer Boräng wrote: > >> In message >> >> , Xin Shi writes: >>> Hello Experts, >> >>> In the *Org Agenda* buffer, I usually use the key "r" to refresh the >>> content. If some of the agenda files have change from the disk, it will pop >>> up t

Re: [O] PROPERTIES added when cycling state

2012-06-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Florian, please take a look at the variable org-mobile-force-id-on-agenda-item. This is likely what is going on - luckily your post showed that you are using org-mobile. Regards - Carsten On 26.6.2012, at 14:57, Florian Lindner wrote: > Hello, > > recently (I think it could be after the

Re: [O] org-mode wrongly parse asterisk (*) in a math equation as mark of bold font

2012-06-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 26.6.2012, at 12:23, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On 26.6.2012, at 10:45, Zihan, Sheldon Liu wrote: >> >>> I wrote the following line in org-mode, which contains two equations. >>> >>> $(Z^{*}_{m}, \c

Re: [O] org-mode wrongly parse asterisk (*) in a math equation as mark of bold font

2012-06-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 26.6.2012, at 10:45, Zihan, Sheldon Liu wrote: > I wrote the following line in org-mode, which contains two equations. > > $(Z^{*}_{m}, \cdot m)$ $(Z^{*}_{m}, \cdot m)$ > > But the org-mode didn't identify them as equations. Instead, it highlight the > part between the two *s, i.e. }_{m},

Re: [O] [GSoC] org-merge-driver weekly update

2012-06-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 6.6.2012, at 15:50, Andrew Young wrote: > Hi Robert Horn, > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Robert Horn wrote: >> Another area that would be nice to address is taking advantage of the >> information in date-trees so assist with merging. This is similar to >> the logic around keeping head

Re: [O] showing standard references (e.g. column B) in tables using C-c }

2012-06-05 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Stephen, On 5.6.2012, at 12:23, Stephen Eglen wrote: > > When using C-c } in a table, the columns are labelled $1, $2, etc. How > can I get them labelled as "A", "B" etc, as in the figure > > http://orgmode.org/worg/images/bzg/reference_visualization.jpg > > Thanks, Stephen > this would

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >