El Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:43:41 +0200 Nicolas Goaziou va escriure:
>
> It could work. But I think [:alnum:] is needed instead of [:alpha:].
> Here's a patch implementing it.
>
Now it's much better. Thanks.
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> Looks good, please go ahead. Thank you both,
Applied.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Here's a patch implementing it.
Looks good, please go ahead. Thank you both,
--
Bastien
Hello,
Daniel Clemente writes:
> I propose: radio links should be delimited by characters that don't match
> [:alpha:] in emacs' regular expression syntax.
> Letters (like: aá書ĉ) match, and delimiters (like: -'"/) don't.
>
> Test it with:
> : (string-match-p "[[:alpha:]]" "á")
> : (string
>
> > Can't we break at non-letters? Not at non-„word-constituents“, but at
> > non-letters. If emacs doesn't provide that concept, better build it.
>
> I don't know. Could you define precisely that concept?
>
I propose: radio links should be delimited by characters that don't match
[:alpha:
Hello,
Daniel Clemente writes:
> „Related thread“: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/82923
>
> I don't see in there any argument to have midword links, it's
> presented as a consequence of other patch.
I didn't say there was an argument there. I just pointed out that your
repo
El Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:57:13 +0200 Nicolas Goaziou va escriure:
>
> > ** Languages
> > *** <<>> language
> > *** <<>>
> > *** etc.
> > Etc. ← should the C in etc be highlighted as a link to „C“? Now it is and
> > it's a bit annoying. This is new behaviour.
>
> Indeed, this is expected. The patch
Hello,
Daniel Clemente writes:
> ** Languages
> *** <<>> language
> *** <<>>
> *** etc.
> Etc. ← should the C in etc be highlighted as a link to „C“? Now it is and
> it's a bit annoying. This is new behaviour.
Indeed, this is expected. The patch you pointed out allows mid-word
radio-targets. S
El Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:59:42 +0200 Nicolas Goaziou va escriure:
> > Hi, recently this syntax: <<< >>> started highlighting all spaces (spaces
> > between words) as if they were links. I see them with a blue underline.
> > I found this because I used some Unicode-art like < >
> >
