[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the same results? Thanks! - Carsten Hi Carsten, I've been at a commit before the clock tables change until today. I've update to the current master and reviewed my agenda clock table results for every day in October and the results are identical for me before and after this change. Thanks, Bernt ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Am 26.10.2010 17:52, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 26.10.2010 13:30, schrieb Carsten Dominik: Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time ||| |---+---+-++--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* ||| ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the same results? Thanks! - Carsten Hi Carsten, I checked and found: - clocktable sums are resulting in identical values, independant of the :maxlevel level - without :maxlevel parameter some tables now give slightly different results than in the past, some give identical results * I hope the new results are correct, but I did not have time to check in detail Looks good, I will test further. no, this did not look good. I think I have found a bug, please pull again... - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode Hi Carsten, same behaviour as before. Below are the two clocktables, one from August, 2nd, version unknown, probably development version from that day or before, the first one from today. The result of the current version is always the same, independant of the :maxlevel level I have deleted the Headlines. #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (~/org/DIPLAN/FILE2.org ~/org/DIPLAN/FILE1/FILE1.org ~/org/DIPLAN/FILE1/Lastenheft.org ~/org/DIPLAN/FILE1/Pflichtenheft.org) :block 2010-05 Clock summary at [2010-10-27 Mi 08:50], for Mai 2010. | File | L | Headline | Time| | | |---+---+--+-+---+---| | | | *Total time* | *86:31* | | | |---+---+--+-+---+---| | FILE1.org | | *File time* | *78:22* | | | | FILE1.org | 1 | | 78:22 | | | | FILE1.org | 2 | | | 45:41 | | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 45:41 | | FILE1.org | 2 | | | 3:23 | | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 0:14 | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 2:14 | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 0:20 | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 0:35 | | FILE1.org | 2 | | | 5:18 | | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 3:18 | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 2:00 | | FILE1.org | 2 | | | 24:00 | | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 5:02 | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 8:10 | | FILE1.org | 3 | | | | 1:30 | | FILE1.org | 3 |
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time ||| |---+---+-+ +--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* ||| ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the same results? Thanks! - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Am 26.10.2010 13:30, schrieb Carsten Dominik: Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | || |---+---+-++--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* | || ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the same results? Thanks! - Carsten Hi Carsten, I checked and found: - clocktable sums are resulting in identical values, independant of the :maxlevel level - without :maxlevel parameter some tables now give slightly different results than in the past, some give identical results * I hope the new results are correct, but I did not have time to check in detail Looks good, I will test further. Thanks and thanks! -- Rainer ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 26.10.2010 13:30, schrieb Carsten Dominik: Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time ||| |---+---+-+ +--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* ||| ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the same results? Thanks! - Carsten Hi Carsten, I checked and found: - clocktable sums are resulting in identical values, independant of the :maxlevel level - without :maxlevel parameter some tables now give slightly different results than in the past, some give identical results This is *very* bad. Please try to make me an example where it was different. - Carsten * I hope the new results are correct, but I did not have time to check in detail Looks good, I will test further. Thanks and thanks! -- Rainer - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 26.10.2010 13:30, schrieb Carsten Dominik: Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time ||| |---+---+-+ +--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* ||| ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the same results? Thanks! - Carsten Hi Carsten, I checked and found: - clocktable sums are resulting in identical values, independant of the :maxlevel level - without :maxlevel parameter some tables now give slightly different results than in the past, some give identical results * I hope the new results are correct, but I did not have time to check in detail Looks good, I will test further. no, this did not look good. I think I have found a bug, please pull again... - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Am 22.07.2010 09:47, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | || |---+---+-++--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* | || ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Indeed, this looks wrong. Unfortunately I don't have time to look at this before my vacation (starting tomorrow) :( Please remind me when I get back. - Carsten Hi Carsten, this is still open, I just tested. I feel like this is a near to major bug because it will simply vary your (work) time calculation if you choose different maxlevels. - Rainer ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Hi all! lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... For toplevel clocktables which just sum up all I use :maxlevel 0 The manual reads :maxlevelMaximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. which I misunderstood. I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! But it looks like :maxlevel 0 does not add everything up. I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope? BTW, the :stepskip0 parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. It is in the manual. - Carsten Rainer Carsten, maybe I misunderstood. 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | || |---+---+-++--++| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* | || ... with :maxlevel 0 I get #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope (file1.org file2) :timestamp t :tstart 2010-05-01 Sa 00:00 :tend 2010-07-31 Sa 23:55 Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | |--+---+---+--+--| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | |--+---+---+--+--| #+END: I would like to get the same results! Is :maxlevel 0 intended to not include the sublevel clocks? If not how can I debug this? - Rainer ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
