Hello,
Marco Wahl writes:
> If there is interest in that patch, the code could be refined to only
> hook into the `post-command-hook' when local numbering of narrowed parts
> has been chosen.
This is mostly already the case. If local numbering of narrowed parts is
inactive, the code executed in
Hello stardiviner,
>>> Just one idea came to my mind. What about adding an option to restart
>>> the numbering at 1 for the first heading in the case when narrowing is
>>> in effect?
>>
>> AFAICT, detecting narrowing changes requires using
>> `post-command-hook'.
>
> Add more things into `post-co
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Marco Wahl writes:
>
>> Just one idea came to my mind. What about adding an option to restart
>> the numbering at 1 for the first heading in the case when narrowing is
>> in effect?
>
> AFAICT, detecting narrowing changes requires using
> `post-command-hoo
Hello,
Marco Wahl writes:
> Just one idea came to my mind. What about adding an option to restart
> the numbering at 1 for the first heading in the case when narrowing is
> in effect?
AFAICT, detecting narrowing changes requires using `post-command-hook'.
Therefore an update to numbering, when
Hi Nicolas and all,
@Nicolas: Thanks for org-num-mode.
> A few weeks ago, I posted on this ML a proof of concept about dynamic
> numbering of headlines in an Org buffer. Since then, I worked on it more
> seriously, improved it, and threw in some features. Here is an excerpt
> of its commentary se
On Tuesday, 20 Nov 2018 at 19:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Since it is very much Org-specific, and a basic feature you could expect
> from Org, I'd like to add it in core. So, if there is no strong
> objection to it, it can go in Org 9.3.
No objection from me at all. I may or may not use this ver
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Since it is very much Org-specific, and a basic feature you could expect
> from Org, I'd like to add it in core. So, if there is no strong
> objection to it, it can go in Org 9.3.
>
> I attach the library for further testing, suggestions, remarks… Let me
> know what you