Brett Viren b...@bnl.gov writes:
Hi,
Hi Brett,
* TODO Subject timestamp :emacs_ver:org_ver:org_module:
...
Emacs version ends up as a tag:
* TODO . :24.3:
Or, if I add an Org version:
* TODO .
Hi Suvayu,
What a nice work you've done... Some comments...
Suvayu Ali wrote:
This is the general structure I'm proposing:
* TODO Subject timestamp :emacs_ver:org_ver:org_module:
:PROPERTIES:
:DEBGUGS_ID: bug number
:REPORTER:Reporter Name
:CC_EMAIL:
Hi Seb and others,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:29:10AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
(date . 1376383861)
* TODO . :24.3:
2013-08-13 Tue
I'd use the inactive version of the timestamp, that is (for Michael)
[2013-08-13 Tue].
Doesn't the
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Suvayu Ali
fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:29:10AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
BTW, is there a convention for using ALLCAPS or
First-letter-cap? I mean: the time estimate property is written
Effort, not EFFORT; is there a
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
Hi Sebastien and Suvayu,
Thanks a lot for your comments. That's pretty good for starting a
proof-of-concept. Will do.
Some comments from my side:
((source . unknown)
(found_versions 24.3)
Emacs version ends up as
Hi Suvayu,
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:29:10AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
(date . 1376383861)
* TODO . :24.3:
2013-08-13 Tue
I'd use the inactive version of the timestamp, that is (for Michael)
[2013-08-13 Tue].
Doesn't the
Hello Michael,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +0200, Michael Albinus wrote:
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
((source . unknown)
(found_versions 24.3)
Emacs version ends up as a tag:
* TODO .
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:13:19PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Now it comes to the attached emails. In a second (!) step, debbugs-gnu
is able to retrieve the corresponding emails. In the given example, it
would call (debbugs-get-bug-log 15081) This returns a list like
(((body . The body
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
I forgot to add; regarding your comment about retrieving several
messages might be expensive, there could be an elisp link or a babel
source block that does this on demand.
Elisp link is the beast I was looking for, thanks. Likely, there is no
Hi,
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes:
* TODO Subject timestamp :emacs_ver:org_ver:org_module:
...
Emacs version ends up as a tag:
* TODO . :24.3:
Or, if I add an Org version:
* TODO .
Hi everyone,
we do not have an issue tracker for Org. However, if you
have some time to help, the file with open issues that need
attention can be found here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/530458/org-tracker.html
Note that I do not enter every issue into this file. Normally I wait
and
Hi,
I was going to ask about this.
The website actually does direct people to a collaborative issue tracker
on Worg:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-issues.html
As outlined there, the idea was that the maintainer would add issues
from the mailing list, but others were welcome to modify the
On 25.9.2013, at 09:28, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com wrote:
Hi,
I was going to ask about this.
The website actually does direct people to a collaborative issue tracker
on Worg:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-issues.html
Ha, I completely forgot about this one, and it seems
to be
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
we do not have an issue tracker for Org. However, if you
have some time to help, the file with open issues that need
attention can be found here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/530458/org-tracker.html
Note that I do not enter every issue into this
On 25.9.2013, at 09:51, Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
we do not have an issue tracker for Org. However, if you
have some time to help, the file with open issues that need
attention can be found here:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:51:20AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the
`org' package is already known to them), if that's possible. Anyway, having
the
bugs in an Org file seems natural too!
I think this is a great idea.
On 25.9.2013, at 08:43, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
we do not have an issue tracker for Org. However, if you
have some time to help, the file with open issues that need
attention can be found here:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On 25.9.2013, at 09:51, Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
we do not have an issue tracker for Org. However, if you
have some time to help, the file with open issues that need
attention can be found here:
Hi Suvayu,
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:51:20AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the
`org' package is already known to them), if that's possible. Anyway, having
the
bugs in an Org file seems natural too!
Hi Sebastiaan,
I have added your issues.
(P.S. this sounds really funny and reminds me of Marvin from the
Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy does solve all of the
major mathematical, physical, chemical, biological, sociological,
philosophical, etymological,meteorological and psychological
problems
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
Hi Suvayu,
Hi,
The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the
`org' package is already known to them), if that's
possible. Anyway, having the
bugs in an Org file seems natural too!
I
Hi Michael,
Michael Albinus wrote:
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com
The other solution that I'd see would be using Emacs' own bug tracker (the
`org' package is already known to them), if that's
possible. Anyway, having the
bugs in an Org file seems natural too!
I think this is a
(I'm not so experienced with org-mode, so I would need at least some
assistance how such a TODO item should look like)
A 'headline' is a 'TODO item' if-and-only-if it contains one of the TODO
Keywords in the appropriate position.
See: http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html
While you're
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I have moved the tracker to Worg, discarding the old tracker file that was at
that location.
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-issues.html
Please note that the Show Org source button still shows the old Org file.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:29:26PM +, Loyall, David wrote:
(I'm not so experienced with org-mode, so I would need at least some
assistance how such a TODO item should look like)
A 'headline' is a 'TODO item' if-and-only-if it contains one of the TODO
Keywords in the appropriate
Loyall, David david.loy...@nebraska.gov writes:
(I'm not so experienced with org-mode, so I would need at least some
assistance how such a TODO item should look like)
A 'headline' is a 'TODO item' if-and-only-if it contains one of the
TODO Keywords in the appropriate position.
See:
Hi Sébastien,
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
Please note that the Show Org source button still shows the old
Org file.
Indeed -- the sources for all Worg files were not properly updated,
I just fixed this. Thanks!
--
Bastien
Hello Michael,
This is the general structure I'm proposing:
* TODO Subject timestamp :emacs_ver:org_ver:org_module:
:PROPERTIES:
:DEBGUGS_ID: bug number
:REPORTER:Reporter Name
:CC_EMAIL:list of emails of interested parties
:END:
I elaborate the ideas
28 matches
Mail list logo
