Hi Achim
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:01, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Why should the git-describe info not be part of the ELPA tarball? If
> there is a good reason not to include it (I think it is useful
> to know which commit the ELPA archive was built on) one could alter the
> include file before rolli
Michael Brand writes:
> Is it possible with your current "make info" to get an info file
> without git describe for a release like ELPA when made from within a
> git repo
Why should the git-describe info not be part of the ELPA tarball? If
there is a good reason not to include it (I think it is
Hi Achim
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:26, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Again I don't know if or when this gets merged. I've already used up my
> TINYCHANGEs and hit an impasse with the FSF papers that I don't know how
> to resolve... :-( Then again, the build system doesn't really become
> part of Emacs,
Michael Brand writes:
> If set-version.pl would be obsolete my patch would be much shorter and
> I would use something even more portable than perl to change the
> version in /tmp/org.texi like the POSIX/SUS ed command, used inline in
> the Makefile. Would you agree?
I don't know if it is still u
Hi Achim
Thank you for your review.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 18:56, Achim Gratz wrote:
> The set-version.pl file may be obsolete (perl is still required),
If set-version.pl would be obsolete my patch would be much shorter and I
would use something even more portable than perl to change the versi
Michael Brand writes:
> There has not yet been any review or comment on the changes in the
> Makefile and in UTILITIES/set-version.pl. I would be happy if these
> parts could be reviewed too.
The set-version.pl file may be obsolete (perl is still required), there
is no version number in the indiv
Hi Carsten and Bastien
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 16:44, Carsten Dominik
wrote:
> is there an agreement that this is a good patch? I have not followed the
> discussion.
Let me summarize:
> On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand wrote:
>> The previous patch attachment had a wrong mime typ
>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand wrote:
>>
>>> I made a new patch replacing the previous, now considering the
>>> Makefile targets "target" and "help" introduced meanwhile by Achim
>>> Gratz and with a shorter name "info-vg" for the new target for easier
>>> typing of the make command.
I still have this as a TODO item for review. I'll take a look at it
this weekend.
-Bernt
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi,
>
> is there an agreement that this is a good patch? I have not followed the
> discussion.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand wrote:
>
>> Hi al
Hi,
is there an agreement that this is a good patch? I have not followed the
discussion.
- Carsten
On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I made a new patch replacing the previous, now considering the
> Makefile targets "target" and "help" introduced meanwhile by
Hi all
I made a new patch replacing the previous, now considering the
Makefile targets "target" and "help" introduced meanwhile by Achim
Gratz and with a shorter name "info-vg" for the new target for easier
typing of the make command.
The previous patch attachment had a wrong mime type, could the
The patch is ready and attached.
Michael
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 17:05, Michael Brand wrote:
[...]
> Since I would like to give the more often used "git describe"
> precedence I will make org-version and "make info_git_describe"
> consistent with git. The ".dirty" postfix of org-version I will le
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:47, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Michael Brand writes:
>> Can I remove this substitution of "release_7.5-350-g3433" ->
>> "release_7.5.350.g3433" from org-version in my patch or should "make
>> info_git_describe" do the same and why?
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> This was purely cosmetic
Michael Brand writes:
> Hi Bernt, hi all
>
> I appreciate that org-version adds the output of "git describe" to the
> org-version string if we are running
> from a git repository. Thanks to Bernt et al:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/16620
>
> Now I suggest the same for the info fi
Hi Bernt, hi all
I appreciate that org-version adds the output of "git describe" to the
org-version string if we are running
from a git repository. Thanks to Bernt et al:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/16620
Now I suggest the same for the info file by using the new target "make
info_
15 matches
Mail list logo
