Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
I wrote the ob-core patch I mentioned before but white writing the commit
message I realized there's probably no need to modify ob-core at all. I was
doing it in order to allow haxe and java to create subdirectories in the
babel temp directory since both languages require class names to match file
I think that is what I also had inn mind, but I care more about the
resheduling part, wouldn't that work with sheduling it on day x and then
have a deadline day x+1?
thu...@arcor.de (Thomas Plass) writes:
> Hi subscribers,
>
> can multiday timestamp ranges be made repeatable? Case in point: I'd
Hi,
Org-num-mode doesn't work for RTL language (e.g. Hebrew) when
`bidi-paragraph-direction` is set to `left-to-right`.
It does work when one sets `bidi-paragraph-direction` to nil.
Example text:
* Test
* עברית
* עוד אחד
* Back to English
I would expect it to work either way because
I have a task sheduled like that:
* TODO Order from a delivery service
SCHEDULED: <2020-10-06 Di .+2w>
So if I understand the resheduling correctly if I miss the task, it
get's resheduled 2 weeks later (probably deadline would be better here)?
But the delivery service delievers weekly I just
01.09.2020 23:39, TEC wrote:
Maxim Nikulin writes:
Installation page
I am uncertain if it is applicable for other editors, but I would
like to see name of vim plugin since ambiguity (or matter of taste)
exists.. FAQ suggests other vim plugins. I do not remember if I saw
vim-outliner
On Wednesday, 30 Sep 2020 at 12:57, TEC wrote:
> +1 for line numbers
Likewise.
And, just to be greedy, the name of the source block as well would be
very useful (if present). I do tend to name all of my blocks, if only
to help with navigation by being able to jump to any block from anywhere
Hello Uwe,
Very well, it seems that we are on the right track. So you might gain
some speed by preventing some minor modes to load at the beginning and
load only when you need them.
Like Ihor Radchenko mentioned in his previous a great way to diagnose
the issu would be the following:
1. M-x
Stefan Huchler writes:
> I have a task sheduled like that:
>
> * TODO Order from a delivery service
> SCHEDULED: <2020-10-06 Di .+2w>
>
> So if I understand the resheduling correctly if I miss the task, it
> get's resheduled 2 weeks later (probably deadline would be better here)?
>
> But the
Bastien writes:
If there is absolutely zero burden put on the shoulders of Org's
maintainers, then I'm all for it.
From the look of things, there's just effort in the initial
creation.
I think it would serve well the proliferation and
popularization of org-mode.
Agreed.
This is the
Fellow denizens of the Emacs-verse,
This is the second and final Call for Proposals for EmacsConf 2020,
which was extended through October 7 (next Wednesday). Please see below
for details on how to submit your proposal(s), and how to chat about or
get help with your proposals via our #emacsconf
Hi folks,
I often put links in TODOs, but it would appear that in org 9.4, marking a
task complete changes the font of the entire text (link and non-link) to be the
same color, so the link is no longer highlighted.
Minimal org file:
```
* TODO This is a [[https://www.gnu.org][test]
Bob Wilson writes:
> I often put links in TODOs, but it would appear that in org 9.4,
> marking a task complete changes the font of the entire text (link and
> non-link) to be the same color, so the link is no longer highlighted.
[...]
> I tried searching the mailing list to see if this has been
> Is there a way to reshedule it, if it fails 1 week later and if I
> complete it, reshedule 2 weeks later?
There is no built-in way to do it, but you can always write your own
org-trigger-hook.
Alternatively, you can also use org-edna. Something like
:TRIGGER: if self todo-state?("FAILED")
>>> "JJ" == Jeremie Juste writes:
Hi Jeremie
> Hello Uwe,
> Can you test with emacs -Q ?
I did and then it is much much faster, so the question is which of my
dozens of org files slow it down.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Tuesday, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:06, Jeremie Juste wrote:
> A 1.6M org file took a little under 7 sec on my computer.
A 2.1MB file took about 11 seconds on my computer (not new but high spec 8
years ago: multiple Xeon processors with a lot of memory but probably slow
disk).
--
: Eric S Fraga via
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Huchler writes:
> I have a task sheduled like that:
>
> * TODO Order from a delivery service
> SCHEDULED: <2020-10-06 Di .+2w>
>
> ...
> Is there a way to reshedule it, if it fails 1 week later and if I
> complete it, reshedule 2 weeks later?
I don't think there's any way
>>> "T" == TEC writes:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>> a long time ago i discovered that drawers were the bottleneck. i
>> removed a lot of them and got much faster loading speeds. idk if
>> that
>> is still true.
> There's a thread about improving this, see:
>
On Wednesday, 30 Sep 2020 at 11:21, Mike Gauland wrote:
> I'd like to have a frame around images in my exported documents. I'm
> primarily interested in LaTeX export, but html is a secondary concern.
There are definitely LaTeX ways of doing this (e.g. using mdframed is
the best I've found for
Hi Timothy,
TEC writes:
>> Is anyone willing to check that there are no constraints?
>
> I've read through https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838 and I couldn't
> see any constraints placed on us beyond the initial registration's
> requirements.
You register once and for all? Is there some red
Bastien writes:
You register once and for all? Is there some red tape involved
in
maintaining the registration?
Assuming I haven't misread/missed anything, the only thing that we
might
cause a change is if the specification changes - but since it
looks like
we can just link to our
22 matches
Mail list logo
