Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
If there is absolutely zero burden put on the shoulders of Org's
maintainers, then I'm all for it.
From the look of things, there's just effort in the initial
creation.
I think it would serve well the proliferation and
popularization of org-mode.
Agreed.
This is the main reason why I'm a fan of the idea :)
Is anyone willing to check that there are no constraints?
I've read through https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838 and I
couldn't see
any constraints placed on us beyond the initial registration's
requirements.
For that, I think a formal syntax specification would be needed.
Perhaps
https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html will do? It looks
complete.
I'm hoping we could then use https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7763
(registration of text/markdown) as a template, where we could just
link
to the syntax specification.
Perhaps it could be worth putting the syntax spec under the main
site as
something like orgmode.org/syntax-spec.html.
I've also been considering spinning off the manual into a bit of a
specification document (e.g. less of a guide / how-to, stripped
down to
just the bare information), so perhaps
orgmode.org/specification.html#syntax ? I'd really like some
second
opinions.
Is anyone willing to move forward with this registration?
In about two months, I am.
It looks like creating and draft and then emailing it to
media-ty...@iana.org would probably be the best approach.
All the best,
Timothy.
