Hi Tim,
Tim Cross writes:
> Thanks Bastien. I think it is good to have a clear statement on this,
> even if not everyone agrees, as it makes things explicit. I
> suspect this will need to be reviewed after each release of a new Emacs
> version though as the effort to maintain backwards
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 02:55:46AM -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> On 2021-09-29 02:39, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:54:48AM -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> >>As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
> >>has user rw, group rw, other nothing.
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> That won't work if you have more than one reference in a citation?
>
> [cite:@doe 4, with some more text; @jones]
No, that won't work with more than one reference in a citation. But
this, coupled with the simple locator parsing done in oc-csl.el should
be
>>> "JMM" == Juan Manuel Macías writes:
Hi Juan,
> Hi Uwe,
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Any idea how to export checkboxes to odt?
>>
>> I mean not just simply having [ ] in the odt document but having them
>> translated as actual boxes.
> You can try:
> (defun my/org-odt--checkbox (item)
>
No Wayman writes:
> See attached.
Applied, thanks.
--
Bastien
> Hi Juan,
> Thanks very much, I saw it too late to respond yesterday. A couple of remarks
> 1. (on "\u2611 ") ; CHECK MARK: I rather prefer 2612 but this is a
>question of taste
> 2. It seems not to work, I loaded the function and Executed the
>advice, but
I just
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:54:48AM -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
> has user rw, group rw, other nothing. Instead, what really happens
> currently is 0660 is treated as an integer which is actually
> 3140. This produces
Dear András,
András Simonyi writes:
> the patch which I attached removes some stray/leftover words from the
> manual's section on citations.
Applied, thank you very much.
--
Bastien
>>> "T" == Timothy writes:
> Hello,
>>> Any idea how to export checkboxes to odt?
>>> I mean not just simply having [ ] in the odt document but having them
>>> translated as actual boxes.
>>
>> Either using latex ⊠
>> or UTF8 ☒
> I’m wondering, would this be worth adding to ox-odt?
I
Hi Max,
Max Nikulin writes:
> lisp/org.el:;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.3"))
>
> Should not it be updated?
Indeed, done, thanks.
> Ubuntu-18.04 bionic is a Long Time Support release (April 2018),
> emacs-25.2.2 provided from system repository. Maybe it should be
> supported even though
Tomas,
> Why not recommend Elisp's explicit syntax for octal representation,
> i.e. :tangle-mode #o660? And put a prominent note in the docs,
> of course.
as much as my fingers are used to "0660 ==> octal", this probably makes
sense.
on the other hand, to protect users, might it be worthwhile
Hi Tim,
Tim Cross writes:
> Perhaps we need to clarify that the supported versions is based on the
> version of Emacs which was stable at the time of release of the org
> version. For example, org 9.5, being released this week, means it would
> support Eamcs 27.x, 26.x and 25.x, but not Emacs
Am 25.09.2021 um 16:48 schrieb Bastien:
Hi Denis,
Denis Maier writes:
Bump.
Can you propose a patch for this?
I would have already done if I knew how to do this.
That's maybe a nice elisp exercise so I'll have look, but I fear that's
way beyond my capabilities, and probably something
Am 29.09.2021 um 08:30 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
That won't work if you have more than one reference in a citation?
[cite:@doe 4, with some more text; @jones]
No, that won't work with more than one reference in a citation. But
this, coupled with the simple
Hi Matt,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> I've tested it, and if you revert
> 78783f4e47901255695031dae0efcbb301a40878 and apply the new patch, it
> will apply with conflicts. Let me know if you run into any difficulties,
> have any concerns, etc.
Done, thanks a lot.
> Here's the patch for the news
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Hi Loris,
>
> can you confirm the bug is gone with latest Org?
>
> ~$ git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/emacs/org-mode.git
Yes, the bug has been fixed for my use-case.
Thanks for all your hard work and sorry for not confirming sooner.
Cheers,
Loris
--
Hi Loris,
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> Thanks for all your hard work and sorry for not confirming sooner.
No problem, thanks for confirming!
--
Bastien
Jeremy Cowgar writes:
> On 2021-09-29 02:39, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:54:48AM -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
>>> As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
>>> has user rw, group rw, other nothing. Instead, what really happens
>>> currently
Hi Loris,
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> Would it be worth expanding Point 4 to something like
>
> This is where you configure Org-mode with Emacs. Please refer to Org
> tutorials. To test a locally installed version the following minimal
> init.el will suffice:
>
> (let
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:52:23AM +0200, dkrm wrote:
>
> Jeremy Cowgar writes:
[...]
> > Are you suggesting this currently works or that the patch should be
> > changed to make that work? A quick try on my local system (pre-patch),
> > I receive the error:
> >
> > Wrong type argument:
On 2021-09-29 10:22 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:52:23AM +0200, dkrm wrote:
Jeremy Cowgar writes:
[...]
Are you suggesting this currently works or that the patch should be
changed to make that work? A quick try on my local system (pre-patch),
I receive the error:
Hi Yasushi,
Yasushi SHOJI writes:
> It's not that important, but if you have time would you please take a
> look at this:
> https://list.orgmode.org/44f768b5-bade-e07a-29a7-15999eefd...@binghamton.edu/t/#mc90ae0a5266fe201d44e6f8f174b2d874f7c57fd
I applied the three patches, with some
On 2021-09-29 02:39, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:54:48AM -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
has user rw, group rw, other nothing. Instead, what really happens
currently is 0660 is treated as an integer which
Hi John,
John Hendy writes:
> $ git pull
> make clfatal: unable to update url base from redirection:
> asked for:
> https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack
>redirect:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/?service=git-upload-pack
Hi,
On the page
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#keeping-current-with-Org-mode-development
after one has compiled and installed, Point 4 says
This is where you configure Org-mode with Emacs. Please refer to Org
tutorials.
I had to fiddle around a bit to get a minimal init.el that
Bastien,
A message in this thread
https://orgmode.org/list/87tuiaxivh@posteo.net/ (Juan Manuel Macías,
Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:23:14 +) contains a patch that fixes a
Shakespeare's sonnet in org-manual.org
Due to updated ORG-NEWS file, it could not be applied directly. I had it
applied
On 29/09/2021 11:07, Timothy wrote:
Any idea how to export checkboxes to odt?
I mean not just simply having [ ] in the odt document but having them
translated as actual boxes.
Either using latex ⊠
or UTF8 ☒
I’m wondering, would this be worth adding to ox-odt?
LibreOffice has some
Max Nikulin writes:
> Bastien,
>
> A message in this thread
> https://orgmode.org/list/87tuiaxivh@posteo.net/ (Juan Manuel
> Macías, Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:23:14 +) contains a patch that fixes a
> Shakespeare's sonnet in org-manual.org
>
> Due to updated ORG-NEWS file, it could not be
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Yet, why not simply alter the headline parser a little bit to support
> empty titles + tag? Such headlines are used in some of the tests. See
> the attached patch.
I've now applied this patch -- let's not close the discussion though,
and keep in mind Nicolas
On 29/09/2021 14:52, Loris Bennett wrote:
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#keeping-current-with-Org-mode-development
I had to fiddle around a bit to get a minimal init.el that allowed me to
test a fix made in the Savannah repo.
I am unsure, what the FAQ entry should contain. Just to
Hi Max,
Max Nikulin writes:
> A message in this thread
> https://orgmode.org/list/87tuiaxivh@posteo.net/ (Juan Manuel
> Macías, Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:23:14 +) contains a patch that fixes a
> Shakespeare's sonnet in org-manual.org
Thanks for bringing this to my attention: I've now applied
Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy Cowgar writes:
> As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
> has user rw, group rw, other nothing. Instead, what really happens
> currently is 0660 is treated as an integer which is actually
> 3140. This produces unexpected file permissions.
(Just
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:29:06AM +0200, Gyro Funch wrote:
[...]
> I don't know if it would ever be ambiguous, but could :tangle-mode
> have the ability to infer if it were integer- or octal-format based
> on checking against 'reasonable' permission settings in octal
> notation?
To me, that
Hi Juan,
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> I also removed a spurious phrase that I put in that patch
> (Org-News).
Applied too! Thanks.
--
Bastien
Hi Joe,
Bastien writes:
> See the docstring of `org-priority-highest':
I'm discarding this patch right now - feel free to submit a bug report
if there is something I missed.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
"\"Joshua O'Connor\"" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what the reason is for Org to employ the tactic of
> overriding the variable 'display-buffer-alist' in a few places, using
> the 'org-no-popups' macro?
>
> It's my understanding that this variable is to be exclusively set by
> users, and
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:48:47PM +0800, Timothy wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> > As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
> > has user rw, group rw, other nothing. Instead, what really happens
> > currently is 0660 is treated as an integer which is actually
> > 3140.
Hi,
Was something wrong with my previous report or is nobody interested in
inline tasks?
Inline tasks are a great feature of org-mode, very useful to include tasks
in all sorts of documents without interfering with the document structure.
I resend my report with now hopefully all information to
writes:
> So you favour going the "full custom special parser". You're much more
> involved in Org, so I think your gut feeling counts more than mine here :)
Well, I'm not sure that my feeling is representative of experienced Org users,
my opinion basically boils down to:
>> I think as long
Michael Dauer writes:
> Hi,
>
> Was something wrong with my previous report or is nobody interested in
> inline tasks?
Your report is fine, but please note the following
(https://orgmode.org/worg/org-mailing-list.html):
>> What to do if you don't receive an answer
>> If your email is
Tomas,
in fact, i'm quite used to doing `chmod 755 foo.org`. i do it now in
bash, used to do it in csh, and it seems to work (as expected, afaict)
also in sh. all on arch linux. (`chmod +755 foo.org` *does* seem to
give odd results. :)
cheers, Greg
Hi all,
Org 9.5 is out, available from GNU ELPA.
Thanks a lot to every contributor.
See this page to join our efforts:
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html
See the list of changes here:
https://orgmode.org/Changes.html
Enjoy!
--
Bastien
I have tried this with -Q in Emacs 25 and recent Org maint. Also with
my usual setup. I have not tested the Org released today.
I frequently try to fill bullet lists, where items are longer than fill column.
- mark the list using set-mark-command and movement. [hre is
something to mke the
Bastien,
thanks very much for all of this information.
> I plan to work on improving Woof! in the next months to make it more
> stable and (hopefully) usable and useful, but it helps a lot already.
if Woof! is even part of how you have managed to keep track, and manage,
the myriad of mailing
Hi!
I briefly tried the patch today, and it seemed to solve the issue on my
end, but I'm afraid a deeper analysis of the changes is beyond what I
can do. As for it's relevance, when I didn't apply Sebastien's patch and
disabled my temporary workaround fix I described in the original post,
Hi Samuel,
"Samuel Banya" writes:
> Thanks for this, will see how I can help as I would love to improve
> my Elisp skills a bit.
Go wild!
> I'll look to see if there are low-hanging fruit type issues that are
> easy to modify first on the Sourcehut repo.
SourceHut is for Worg, the
Hey there,
Thanks for the breakdown for all of this.
I'm a long time user of Org Mode in my every day work as a Technical Support
Engineer with the past two jobs I've had, so its awesome how easy it is to
possibly contribute to it, as I really really really do think Org Mode and
Emacs are
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:18:02PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> https://orgmode.org/worg/ is populated by .org pages from the Worg
> repo after each push: https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg
>
> Worg is maintained by Krupal and Corwin Brust. Anyone is welcome to
> contribute:
Hi,
I have read another time "Installation" section of the Org Manual from
main branch. I am glad to see that contrib directory is replaced by the
dedicated repository. I decided to check it after looking at the
version on the web site. Some points might be improved though.
- I have
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 08:18:11PM +0300, Greg Minshall wrote:
> Tomas,
>
> in fact, i'm quite used to doing `chmod 755 foo.org`. i do it now in
> bash, used to do it in csh, and it seems to work (as expected, afaict)
> also in sh. all on arch linux. (`chmod +755 foo.org` *does* seem to
> give
Dear all,
I would like to briefly expose how things work for orgmode.org.
https://orgmode.org/worg/ is populated by .org pages from the Worg
repo after each push: https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg
Worg is maintained by Krupal and Corwin Brust. Anyone is welcome to
contribute:
Hi Russell,
Russell Adams writes:
> What's the correct way for myself and others to request access?
By sending an email to b...@gnu.org telling me what username to add.
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Hi Ihor,
Thanks for the clarification.
I wanted to help you with testing. But I could not find a branch dev in
that repo.
Anyway, I'll wait for it to be populated into the main repo. When should I
retry there?
Regards,
Michael
Am Mi., 29. Sept. 2021 um 17:08 Uhr schrieb Ihor Radchenko <
#+OPTIONS: html-postamble:nil H:5 num:nil ^:{} toc:nil author:nil email:nil tex:dvipng d:nil
#+STARTUP: hidestars indent inlineimages
:PROPERTIES:
:reply-to: nil
:attachment: nil
:alternatives: (utf-8 org)
:END:
Hi Greg,
> i love the searching on list.orgmode.org, but i have this recurrent
>
Hello,
I have just installed Org mode 9.5 and get a few failing tests:
Which LANG = de_DE.UTF-8 I get:
4 unexpected results:
FAILED ob-sed-test/cmd-line-header-argument
FAILED ob-shell/bash-uses-assoc-arrays
FAILED test-org-table/sort-lines
FAILED test-org/auto-repeat-maybe
Hello:
When I update to org 9.5, I find that the align of time like "7:00" has been
changed.
I think the new style is not beautiful as old style.
1. New style look like not align to the first char, for the width of 9 looks
like > 1
2. the old style is align ":"
Feng.
On 2021-09-29 10:58, Timothy wrote:
I think as long as it’s clear what’s intended, and it’s not some
home-baked
non-standard format, or terribly annoying to support — why not?
Anyway, as an example here's a code snippet that implements everything
I've
mentioned.
... code removed for
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:58:43PM +0800, Timothy wrote:
>
> writes:
>
> > So you favour going the "full custom special parser". You're much more
> > involved in Org, so I think your gut feeling counts more than mine here :)
>
> Well, I'm not sure that my feeling is representative of
On 2021-09-29 07:07, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:29:06AM +0200, Gyro Funch wrote:
[...]
I don't know if it would ever be ambiguous, but could :tangle-mode
have the ability to infer if it were integer- or octal-format based
on checking against 'reasonable' permission
Thank you Professor Kitchin. Would something like follows would work?
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results silent
(add-hook 'org-mode-hook (lambda () (font-lock-add-keywords
nil
'(("^-\\{5,\\}" 0 '(:foreground "red"
:weight
Hello,
After my last patch providing support for proportional image width attributes
(e.g. 70% of the text width), I noticed that the results looked slightly off.
Investigating the code lead me to `create-image' which takes the liberty of
re-scaling images based on your default font size. As you
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:17:54AM -0400, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> On 2021-09-29 07:07, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:29:06AM +0200, Gyro Funch wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>I don't know if it would ever be ambiguous, but could :tangle-mode
> >>have the ability to infer if it
Hi Jeremy,
> As an org user I would expect :tangle-mode 0660 to produce a file that
> has user rw, group rw, other nothing. Instead, what really happens
> currently is 0660 is treated as an integer which is actually
> 3140. This produces unexpected file permissions.
I agree that :tangle-mode
63 matches
Mail list logo
