Re: [O] Converting AsciiDoc to org-mode, preserving index entries

[Diego Zamboni]

Hi John,

Thanks - it would be indeed a one-time conversion. I may end up going this
route, but I thought there should be a proper way of doing it :)

Best,
--Diego

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:25 AM, John Kitchin 
wrote:

> If it is a one-time conversion, it might be worthwhile just replacing the
> index terms with something temporary, getting to the org-file, and then
> putting them back in the right way. For example, you could replace each
> term with a uuid, and keep a list that maps the uuid to the term. Then the
> uuid would pass through the pandoc untouched, and afterwards, go back
> through and replace the uuid with the #+INDEX entries.
>
> I don't know if that is worth the effort, but it might get you a faster
> org-doc than bug reporting :)
>
> John
>
> ---
> Professor John Kitchin
> Doherty Hall A207F
> Department of Chemical Engineering
> Carnegie Mellon University
> Pittsburgh, PA 15213
> 412-268-7803 <(412)%20268-7803>
> @johnkitchin
> http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Diego Zamboni 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a large document (a book) written in AsciiDoc, and I’ve been
>> thinking of converting it to org-mode, which I find eminently more
>> readable. The method I’ve come up with is:
>>
>> 1. AsciiDoc -> Docbook using asciidoc or asciidoctor
>> 2. Docbook -> org using pandoc
>>
>> The conversion seems to work well, except for one thing: I have index
>> terms in my AsciiDoc files using the ‘((( … )))’ syntax (
>> http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#index-terms). Step 1 converts
>> them correctly into  tags, but pandoc inserts them as part of
>> the main text instead of producing‘#+INDEX entries.
>>
>> Before I go report the bug to Pandoc, I was wondering if anyone has tried
>> this and maybe come up with some other way of doing the conversion.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> —Diego
>>
>>
>

Re: [O] Converting AsciiDoc to org-mode, preserving index entries

[John Kitchin]

If it is a one-time conversion, it might be worthwhile just replacing the
index terms with something temporary, getting to the org-file, and then
putting them back in the right way. For example, you could replace each
term with a uuid, and keep a list that maps the uuid to the term. Then the
uuid would pass through the pandoc untouched, and afterwards, go back
through and replace the uuid with the #+INDEX entries.

I don't know if that is worth the effort, but it might get you a faster
org-doc than bug reporting :)

John

---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu


On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Diego Zamboni  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a large document (a book) written in AsciiDoc, and I’ve been
> thinking of converting it to org-mode, which I find eminently more
> readable. The method I’ve come up with is:
>
> 1. AsciiDoc -> Docbook using asciidoc or asciidoctor
> 2. Docbook -> org using pandoc
>
> The conversion seems to work well, except for one thing: I have index
> terms in my AsciiDoc files using the ‘((( … )))’ syntax (
> http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#index-terms). Step 1 converts
> them correctly into  tags, but pandoc inserts them as part of
> the main text instead of producing‘#+INDEX entries.
>
> Before I go report the bug to Pandoc, I was wondering if anyone has tried
> this and maybe come up with some other way of doing the conversion.
>
> Thanks!
>
> —Diego
>
>

[O] Converting AsciiDoc to org-mode, preserving index entries

[Diego Zamboni]

Hi,

I have a large document (a book) written in AsciiDoc, and I’ve been thinking of 
converting it to org-mode, which I find eminently more readable. The method 
I’ve come up with is:

1. AsciiDoc -> Docbook using asciidoc or asciidoctor
2. Docbook -> org using pandoc

The conversion seems to work well, except for one thing: I have index terms in 
my AsciiDoc files using the ‘((( … )))’ syntax 
(http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#index-terms 
). Step 1 converts them 
correctly into  tags, but pandoc inserts them as part of the main 
text instead of producing‘#+INDEX entries.

Before I go report the bug to Pandoc, I was wondering if anyone has tried this 
and maybe come up with some other way of doing the conversion.

Thanks!

—Diego