Hi Bastien,
of course this is how I'd like it to work as well, but this was too hard for
the moment... :(
On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi Carsten and Max,
Dominik, Carsten c.domi...@uva.nl writes:
already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
of course this is how I'd like it to work as well, but this was too
hard for the moment... :(
No problem -- since `org-agenda-sticky' is nil by default
you can proceed with the merge when you think it's okay (also
see Martyn's feedback) and
On 3.4.2012, at 09:06, Bastien wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
of course this is how I'd like it to work as well, but this was too
hard for the moment... :(
No problem -- since `org-agenda-sticky' is nil by default
you can proceed with the merge when you
Hi Carsten and Max,
Dominik, Carsten c.domi...@uva.nl writes:
already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first
version of his code to implement multiple agenda buffers. I have
worked with him over the last few weeks, and we think that
it is now quite stable.
I've been trying the
Hi Manuel,
Manuel Hermenegildo he...@fi.upm.es writes:
But, would it be possible to achieve the behavior I had mistakenly
assumed?
Going back to the week view example, Org would remember the rendering
of each week as you move from one week to another, not recomputing a
week that has
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
[...]
+1
Works very well for me.
My Org Agenda usage has modified somewhat thanks to the use of
'org-agenda-sticky and I really like my current usage.
Thanks!
Martyn
---
Org-mode version 7.8.06 (release_7.8.03.594.g013d)
GNU Emacs
Hi Carsten,
I have had no problems with sticky buffers.
I use 2 or 3 of them and really like the function.
When will they be merged into master?
Regards,
Rainer
Am 11.03.2012 13:48, schrieb Dominik, Carsten:
Hi everyone,
already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first
version of
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
I have had no problems with sticky buffers.
I use 2 or 3 of them and really like the function.
When will they be merged into master?
I will test the branch and merge it to master if there is no problem.
But I need to focus on
Hi all,
no need to hurry,
I just wanted to hear about plans.
I can stick with the test branch for now.
Best,
Rainer
Am 22.03.2012 11:12, schrieb Bastien:
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
I have had no problems with sticky buffers.
I use 2 or 3 of them and
Hi,
Thanks for the new possibility!
It works as described.
I have a few functions based on the org-agenda-buffer-name, which now is no
more available,
as all the agenda buffers are named differently:
..
(if (get-buffer org-agenda-buffer-name)
..
will no more work.
I hope that the current
At Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:54:17 +0100,
Rainer Stengele wrote:
I have a few functions based on the org-agenda-buffer-name, which now is no
more available,
as all the agenda buffers are named differently:
..
(if (get-buffer org-agenda-buffer-name)
..
will no more work.
If you don't turn
Dear Max and Dominik,
the new sticky agenda buffers are great! I have been using the branch
for some time now and they seem to work fine. Fantastic job.
I have to say at first I thought they were not working and it was
because I had a preconception that they would do something else: I
thought
Cannot test at this time, but I have an a priori comment.
Having multiple agenda buffers around increases the probability that
you will change the outline buffers before you perform an operation in
the agenda. You might do this either by performing agenda commands in
an agenda buffer or by
Hi everyone,
already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first
version of his code to implement multiple agenda buffers. I have
worked with him over the last few weeks, and we think that
it is now quite stable.
Sticky agenda buffers (this is how Max calls it now) means the
ability to
14 matches
Mail list logo
