Hi,
> IIRC there was some back and forth about compatibility of this
> statement and the GPL, but cannot remember where I read this.
Thats exactly what I remembered, and I searched gmane for it.
This topic (emacswiki and license) came up when bzr was adopted
and the main document for transition
Am 04.08.2010 07:36, schrieb Bastien:
Or we might also consider CC0:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
It looks way more simple to me.
It also circumvents the problem of people having to sign the FSF papers
if the Org/Emacs manuals include part of the code they contributed t
Ian Barton writes:
> The Software Freedom Law Centre has some good guidelines on licensing.
> Specificall you might want to look at:
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-120002.4
> and
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html
T
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Hi all,
>
> what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg?
>
> Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the
> GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA
> 3.0[3] license. This solution would make
On 04/08/10 06:36, Bastien wrote:
> Or we might also consider CC0:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
>
> It looks way more simple to me.
>
> It also circumvents the problem of people having to sign the FSF papers
> if the Org/Emacs manuals include part of the code they cont
Or we might also consider CC0:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
It looks way more simple to me.
It also circumvents the problem of people having to sign the FSF papers
if the Org/Emacs manuals include part of the code they contributed to
Worg as examples.
What people think?
David Maus writes:
> Bastien wrote:
>>Hi all,
>
>>what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg?
>
>>Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the
>>GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA
>>3.0[3] license. This solution wou
