Re: [O] Citation syntax: now supported in Pandoc

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I rebased wip-cite onto master. I didn't test the branch but "make test" > reports no problem. Great, thanks! I guess this does not include the preliminary work on the org-cite library (from Aaron Ecay's wip-cite-awe branch), or

Re: [O] Citation syntax: now supported in Pandoc

Hello, Richard Lawrence writes: > Matt Price writes: > >> Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode? > > Nope. At least, I have not done any work on this, and I don't know of > anyone else who has either. I suppose

Re: [O] Citation syntax: now supported in Pandoc

Hi Matt, Matt Price writes: > Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode? Nope. At least, I have not done any work on this, and I don't know of anyone else who has either. I suppose I should rebase it onto master again, but it's hard to justify

Re: [O] Citation syntax: now supported in Pandoc

Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode? I'd like ot try it out but would rather not go back to a pre-9.0 version or org, having done a certain amount of work to update to the new framework... Thanks! On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Julian M. Burgos

Re: [O] Citation syntax: now supported in Pandoc

This is very interesting! I will give it a try. Thanks for the heads up. Richard Lawrence writes: > Hi everyone, > > With Org 9.0 out, I thought it might be a good time to revisit the issue > of citation syntax. Not much has happened with this recently, but I do > have one bit of progress to