Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
,[ C-h f yes-or-no-p RET ]
| yes-or-no-p is an alias for `y-or-n-p'.
|
| (yes-or-no-p PROMPT)
|
| Ask user a y or n question.
`
= nil
The interpreter produces _normalized_ syntax. It ignores indentation,
capitalization on
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
,[ C-h f yes-or-no-p RET ]
| yes-or-no-p is an alias for `y-or-n-p'.
|
| (yes-or-no-p PROMPT)
|
| Ask user a y or n question.
`
= nil
The interpreter produces _normalized_
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Your interpretation of 'obvious' seems (obviously?) be a bit overly
optimistic sometimes.
Probably apocryphal but ...
http://mystatpage.wordpress.com/tag/g-h-hardy/
--
Nick
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Your interpretation of 'obvious' seems (obviously?) be a bit overly
optimistic sometimes.
Probably apocryphal but ...
http://mystatpage.wordpress.com/tag/g-h-hardy/
Nice.
Whats really obvious is that spelling
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Hi List,
evaluating this
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(org-element-interpret-data
'(item (:bullet 1 :tag hello :checkbox trans :counter 2)
(section nil world)))
#+END_SRC
#+results:
: 1. [@2] hello ::
:world
the content is always
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Hi List,
evaluating this
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(org-element-interpret-data
'(item (:bullet 1 :tag hello :checkbox trans :counter 2)
(section nil world)))
#+END_SRC
#+results:
: 1.
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
[...]
You should not provide 'on, 'off or 'trans, and even less strings, but
on, off or trans since your expression is already quoted.
One more question: bullet strings are parsed 'as-is', but the
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
One more question: bullet strings are parsed 'as-is', but the
interpreter seems to have its own logic that is a bit difficult to grok
(or are there syntax errors too?):
This is simple: ordered lists bullets are always X., where X is
a number
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
So when creating an element with interpreted content (that is given as
plain string), I use
- headlines :: (section nil foo)
- others :: (paragraph nil foo)
If contents are already interpreted,
- anything :: foo
is sufficient, I think.
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
One more question: bullet strings are parsed 'as-is', but the
interpreter seems to have its own logic that is a bit difficult to grok
(or are there syntax errors too?):
This is simple: ordered
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
The conclusion of your answer above is that the item-interpreter cannot
produce the complete org-mode syntax for plain-lists that is recognized
by the parser and described in the manual?
This question is too tricky (and closed) for me to answer.
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
The conclusion of your answer above is that the item-interpreter cannot
produce the complete org-mode syntax for plain-lists that is recognized
by the parser and described in the manual?
This question
12 matches
Mail list logo
