Simon Castellan writes:
> For now I am rebasing my parser on your categories (I must say I was
> lacking a lot). Please let me know when you change your syntaxic
> categories (by change you mean additions only or removals as well ?).
I have a couple additions in mind: I'd like to refine table pa
Hello,
Thanks for your answer. I think indeed that a description of org's syntax would
be better in a separate document. For now I am rebasing my parser on your
categories (I must say I was lacking a lot). Please let me know when you change
your syntaxic categories (by change you mean additions on
Hello,
Simon Castellan writes:
> Thank you very much for this pointer, This is what I was looking for :
> a list of syntaxic construction in org-mode. I'd say though that it
> lacks a more-or-less formal syntaxic definition of constructions.
It lacks that, indeed, among many other things. On th
On lun. 27/févr. (09:52), Eric Schulte wrote:
> Simon Castellan writes:
>
> > On lun. 27/févr. (15:27), Alan Schmitt wrote:
> >> On 26 févr. 2012, at 17:41, Simon Castellan wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have been writing a parser for mlorg files in OCaml. This started as an
> >> > experiment to see if th
Simon Castellan writes:
> On lun. 27/févr. (15:27), Alan Schmitt wrote:
>> On 26 févr. 2012, at 17:41, Simon Castellan wrote:
>>
>> > I have been writing a parser for mlorg files in OCaml. This started as an
>> > experiment to see if the literate programming mode of org-mode could scale
>> > to
On lun. 27/févr. (15:27), Alan Schmitt wrote:
> On 26 févr. 2012, at 17:41, Simon Castellan wrote:
>
> > I have been writing a parser for mlorg files in OCaml. This started as an
> > experiment to see if the literate programming mode of org-mode could scale
> > to a
> > full application (among ot
On 26 févr. 2012, at 17:41, Simon Castellan wrote:
> I have been writing a parser for mlorg files in OCaml. This started as an
> experiment to see if the literate programming mode of org-mode could scale to
> a
> full application (among other things).
This looks very interesting, and would very
