Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

> Hmmm, you may well be right. Fair enough. I reverted it. thanks!

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Greg Minshall writes: >> Of course we do: just write >> >> foocall_foo() >> >> or >> >> foocall_foo() > > !!! :) > > (but, seems less intuitive. maybe my math/CS brainwashing, liking to > have lexical elements, etc.; that part of me would still vote for > reverting.)

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

> Of course we do: just write > > foocall_foo() > > or > > foocall_foo() !!! :) (but, seems less intuitive. maybe my math/CS brainwashing, liking to have lexical elements, etc.; that part of me would still vote for reverting.)

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Greg Minshall writes: > thanks for the reply. i'd suggest reverting (most of) 7efa... so that > foocall_foo() *stays* as foocall_foo(). (i.e., put the "\\<" back in > front of "call_" and "sys_".) otherwise, we have no (straight forward) > way (am i right? sometimes my head

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Nico, thanks for the reply. i'd suggest reverting (most of) 7efa... so that foocall_foo() *stays* as foocall_foo(). (i.e., put the "\\<" back in front of "call_" and "sys_".) otherwise, we have no (straight forward) way (am i right? sometimes my head hurts!) to get a plain "foocall_foo()" in

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Hello, Greg Minshall writes: > one concern: if i essentially "revert" the changes in > 7efa0f2879226695ad9b309c9263a4d1b5d79e89, call_ and src_ all work, but i > get the ZERO WIDTH SPACE (ZSWP, \u200b) propagated into the resulting > output file (.html, .tex). it doesn't seem

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Nico, > At some point, someone will want to write foo#call_bar() without > #call_bar() being replaced, and we will go back to point 0. IMO, > zero-width space is the way to go, if only because it can already be > used to escape other special characters in Org. oof, of course! color me

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Greg Minshall writes: > ah. how does one enter a zero-width space in emacs/org-mode? also, i'm > curious about how it looks on the screen. (for me, i'd want it to look, > on the screen, *very* obvious that *something* is there.) > > i also apologize that the patch i sent

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:51 PM Kaushal Modi wrote: > > All glyphs are shown in `modi/highlight-confusing' face." > Forgot to paste the face definition (I just set it to colors to suit my default theme): (defface modi/highlight-confusing '((t (:foreground "black"

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:44 PM Greg Minshall wrote: > > ah. how does one enter a zero-width space in emacs/org-mode? By default, you can do C-x 8 RET and type ZERO WIDTH SPACE and the 0x200b character will be inserted. I use it once in a while, so I have bound it to C-x 8

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Nico, > I meant zero-width space, not non-breaking space. Note that it can be > used in other places to escape special characters, e.g., verbatim > markup. ah. how does one enter a zero-width space in emacs/org-mode? also, i'm curious about how it looks on the screen. (for me, i'd want it to

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Greg Minshall writes: > thanks. neither =verbatim markup= (if that's the usage), nor a > non~breaking~space give me, in my output, a plain, unadorned > "xxcall_foo()". I meant zero-width space, not non-breaking space. Note that it can be used in other places to escape special

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Nico, thanks. neither =verbatim markup= (if that's the usage), nor a non~breaking~space give me, in my output, a plain, unadorned "xxcall_foo()". i *do* think xxcall_foo() is very intuitive for both sets of people, both those who want xx+results and those who want literal xxcall_foo(). so,

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Hello, Greg Minshall writes: > not wanting to look gift horses, etc., but i've a question. if i > understand the change correctly > > - (looking-at "\\ + (looking-at "call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]")) > > now

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Nico, ah, thanks! not wanting to look gift horses, etc., but i've a question. if i understand the change correctly - (looking-at "\\

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Hello, Greg Minshall writes: > great! except, oh, well, maybe you really meant to respond to this > other set of messages, with subject line > > Re: [O] BUG report [Was: computing the size of a tikz to png image during > export] > --- Both are fixed, actually, so it

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Nicolas, great! except, oh, well, maybe you really meant to respond to this other set of messages, with subject line Re: [O] BUG report [Was: computing the size of a tikz to png image during export] --- cheers, Greg

Re: [O] non-space, paste, (???) character for inline results

Hello, Greg Minshall writes: > hi. thanks again for org-mode. > > having discovered this variable, i tend to run with > : #+bind: org-babel-inline-result-wrap "%s" > > but, at the same time, i'd often like to put some character(s) before or > after the result of some