[pot@gnu.org: Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.]

2001-03-14 Thread Francesco Potorti`
Well, I tried to write a message for the Emacs developers and pretesters lists, but could not manage to write anything that would make sense. I suspect that we (ar at least it's me) do not have ideas clear enough to be explained outside of here. In fact, I do not manage to make a resume of

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Pete Forman wrote: Daniel Pittman writes: As such, I want to propose an alternate tag to indicate our own paths: "/!/" [...] I agree with you but would like to take it further. How about reworking the whole syntax along these lines.

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 13 Mar 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote: "Pete" == Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /![@enc]/:telnet://[usr[:pwd]@]host1[:port]/ssh://host2/:/path/to/file [...] F tramp-prefix-authority"//:" or "#" Clearly ""//:"" won't do since Emacs tends to interpret it directly. I liked the

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Francesco Potorti` wrote: As such, I want to propose an alternate tag to indicate our own paths: "/!/" Seconded. I still do not like it at all. It's completely different from anything that is done out there. There is a quasi-standard for

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote: I agree with Francesco. I don't like "/!/" at all. The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all. First off, I have to use the shift key to type the exclamation point. So, pick something different. "/tramp/" is available.

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 13 Mar 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote: "Francesco" == Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Emacs should have a general hook for /[^/]+:.* filenames, where [^/]+ is the protocol. Then, different packages could register to that hook and tell it which protocol they do manage. I think

Re: [pot@gnu.org: Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.]

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Francesco Potorti` wrote: Well, I tried to write a message for the Emacs developers and pretesters lists, but could not manage to write anything that would make sense. I am happy to offer what help I can. I would like to see a good solution to the issue forged. I

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Edward J. Sabol
On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote: I agree with Francesco. I don't like "/!/" at all. The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all. Yes, that's always been the case, but I strongly feel that the default should be wisely

check in by grossjoh: 'tramp/lisp tramp.el,2.9 ChangeLog,2.8'

2001-03-14 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/tramp/lisp In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/kai/tramp-devel/tramp/lisp Modified Files: tramp.el ChangeLog Log Message: (tramp-methods, tramp-telnet-args): New method parameter `tramp-telnet-args'. (tramp-get-telnet-args): New function.

check in by grossjoh: 'tramp/texi .cvsignore,2.1'

2001-03-14 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/tramp/texi In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/kai/tramp-devel/tramp/texi Modified Files: .cvsignore Log Message: Ignore *.vrs.

Telnet connection with extra args

2001-03-14 Thread Kai Großjohann
I have now added the `tramp-telnet-args' method parameter, similar to all the other foo-args method parameters. However, I haven't tested this. Some of you wanted this. I think Harry and Ted? Could you please test this version? (New version in CVS, head branch, not stable.) kai -- Be

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote: On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote: I agree with Francesco. I don't like "/!/" at all. The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all. Yes, that's always been the case, but I

Re: TRAMP2 path definitions.

2001-03-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 14 Mar 2001, Kai Grojohann wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote: On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote: [...] It's hard to support, requires hacking the innards of other packages and introduces load-order dependencies in the packages. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's