Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:52:35 -0500
From: ch...@timeguy.com
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-developers] I'm preparing for a 2.5 bugfix release
I want to release 2.5.4 soon; there are some important fixes in
there. I'm aiming for around the 16th, a week from today.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:57:42AM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
(Mostly I'm going to merge the xxx_motion.hal and xxx_servo.hal
files, there is no rational reason for how these were split up.
Also, I will get rid of as much of the newsig/linksp code as
possible in favor of net commands.)
This
It appears to me that the command to switch from inch to metric, is
incompletely done. Or too completely.
Fspeed for instance, is not scaled up to the metric equ, so the sim runs
painfully slow. This was observed executing old code probably written in
2.5.0 days and being used just to
Just had a thought about the canon layer. It would be really nice if
CANON_POSITION was unit-aware:
typedef struct {
double axis[9]; (or just 9 doubles)
unit_t lin_unit;
unit_t ang_unit;
} CANON_POSITION;
unit_t would be an enum representing each known unit (in, mm, deg, rad,
sec,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:09:33PM -0400, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
Ignoring the labor involved in doing the conversion, does this sound like a
good idea?
A few of us tossed around some ideas about this in irc; wish you
could join us:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 18:38, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Fspeed for instance, is not scaled up to the metric equ, so the sim runs
painfully slow
How do you think it should be done?
Are you suggesting that after switching to metric and the interpreter seeing
f15 it should guess you
On Thursday 10 April 2014 20:29:33 Andy Pugh did opine:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 18:38, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Fspeed for instance, is not scaled up to the metric equ, so the sim
runs painfully slow
How do you think it should be done?
Are you suggesting that after switching
On 04/10/2014 11:33 AM, Chris Radek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:57:42AM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
(Mostly I'm going to merge the xxx_motion.hal and xxx_servo.hal
files, there is no rational reason for how these were split up.
Also, I will get rid of as much of the newsig/linksp code as
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
I don't think it was quite all that encompassing before, Andy, and you are
by pure common sense correct. So if I run in metric mode, I'll have to
recall that F is in mm per min. That means a bunch of them. As in 15
Ok - I found another issue. I have been playing with the little terco
mill. Z kept losing steps. I figured noise or running too fast...
well dad said - maybe linuxcnc is erroring.. I thought no way. I have
tested the new tp extensively.. :)
well I ran the config in sim with the peak
you could do something as simple as
G20
F15
G21
On 04/10/2014 08:03 PM, Eric Keller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
I don't think it was quite all that encompassing before, Andy, and you are
by pure common sense correct. So if I run in metric
Hmm, I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend. I suspect this issue
is due to one of the recent fixes. Do you still see violations if the Z
axis limit is the same as X and Y?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:57 PM, sam sokolik sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
Ok - I found another issue. I have
On 04/10/2014 06:36 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2014 20:29:33 Andy Pugh did opine:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 18:38, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Fspeed for instance, is not scaled up to the metric equ, so the sim
runs painfully slow
How do you think it should be done?
On Friday 11 April 2014 00:07:59 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
On 04/10/2014 06:36 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2014 20:29:33 Andy Pugh did opine:
On 10 Apr 2014, at 18:38, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Fspeed for instance, is not scaled up to the metric equ, so
On 04/10/2014 07:54 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Well, one line to enable the feature in the driver, and one
line to
link the signals for each axis. I will do this one, then,
as it creates a
new config rather than changing an existing one.
Oh, I think just knowing where to get the branch from is
On Friday 11 April 2014 00:59:31 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
On 04/10/2014 11:38 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I believe a similar gotcha exists in the MIN_LIMIT/MAX_LIMIT of the
.ini files. They are not, when given in inches, scaled to match
actual distances without a trip into gedit for a
On Friday 11 April 2014 01:42:26 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine:
On 04/10/2014 10:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
If I load some code that expects to run in G20, and before I exec it,
goto MDI and issue a G21, the only F command in it, f1.5 (was
polishing a taper with a diamond wheel in a dremel
17 matches
Mail list logo
