Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-07 Thread Michael Haberler
David, we're working off-list at the moment to get the consolidated RTOS branch as announced here http://tinyurl.com/mhmfgco into shape, and working together with the 3.8.13 xenomai kernel on the BB; which is why you see the 3.2.21 based image as latest announced and some messages referring

[Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread Kent A. Reed
Gentle persons: My interest has been tweaked by several remarks made about performance on the BeagleBone Black. I've started a page (https://sites.google.com/site/manisbutareed/beaglebone-black-linuxcnc) and to kick it off posted some gross characterizations of the burden imposed by various

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 6/6/13 13:19 , Kent A. Reed wrote: My interest has been tweaked by several remarks made about performance on the BeagleBone Black. I've started a page (https://sites.google.com/site/manisbutareed/beaglebone-black-linuxcnc) and to kick it off posted some gross characterizations of the burden

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread Michael Haberler
Kent, Am 06.06.2013 um 21:19 schrieb Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com: Gentle persons: My interest has been tweaked by several remarks made about performance on the BeagleBone Black. I've started a page (https://sites.google.com/site/manisbutareed/beaglebone-black-linuxcnc) and to

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread David Bagby
Hi Kent, I was your dev list post and noticed that your blog link says that you're running the starter kit from Michael on a BBB and that it's a 3.8 kernel with Xenomai etc. I was about to build a 3.8 for the BBB etc, but decided to ask Michael where to find whatever he's already built. He

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread dave
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 14:12 -0700, dave wrote: On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 13:24 -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: On 6/6/13 13:19 , Kent A. Reed wrote: My interest has been tweaked by several remarks made about performance on the BeagleBone Black. I've started a page

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 6/6/2013 3:24 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: On 6/6/13 13:19 , Kent A. Reed wrote: My interest has been tweaked by several remarks made about performance on the BeagleBone Black. I've started a page (https://sites.google.com/site/manisbutareed/beaglebone-black-linuxcnc) and to kick it off

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/6/2013 4:32 PM, David Bagby wrote: Hi Kent, I was your dev list post and noticed that your blog link says that you're running the starter kit from Michael on a BBB and that it's a 3.8 kernel with Xenomai etc. I was about to build a 3.8 for

Re: [Emc-developers] exploring the LinuxCNC 'burden' on my BeagleBone Black

2013-06-06 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 6/6/2013 5:15 PM, Michael Haberler wrote: very interesting writeup! very much in line with my observations I have so far run with a remote X display directly (i.e. without ssh tunneling) by setting DISPLAY on the bb and enabling connect on the X server, so no sshd overhead but more