We occasionally see potential new users of LinuxCNC following the
instructions here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Installing_LinuxCNC
And ending up with a 2.5 installation. Or occasionally even here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Installing_EMC2
And ending up with a 2.4
Andy, I agree, they are two separate problems. I just wanted to answer both
questions in one place since they came up here.
My G15/G16 example is very similar to G28 and G30, but the difference would
be that the retract would happen immediately and automatically on abort of
a program (vs at a
Very interesting stuff! I have some ideas for how to implement a more
EDM-appropriate reverse run mechanism based on what you describe. Here's a
short list of new features we would need to address your concerns
1) Retract-to-setpoint-on-abort modal code. If a retract point is set,
the machine
On 11 April 2015 at 16:13, TJoseph Powderly tjt...@gmail.com wrote:
You may find that the adaptive feedrate idea is very wrong for edm.
I think that the adaptive feed pin was introduced for wire EDM, and if
it doesn't work properly for that then it ought to change.
so, imo the adaptive feed
On 14 April 2015 at 16:17, Robert Ellenberg rwe...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Retract-to-setpoint-on-abort modal code. If a retract point is set,
the machine would automatically retract to that position on abort. Abort
would also clear this set point.
Perhaps this pair of G codes could work (chosen
Robert,
thanks for looking into it
On 04/14/2015 10:17 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
Very interesting stuff! I have some ideas for how to implement a more
EDM-appropriate reverse run mechanism based on what you describe. Here's a
short list of new features we would need to address your concerns
On 14 April 2015 at 23:26, TJoseph Powderly tjt...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, seems true.
i hope your view of the time sale for reversals is
at most millisecs. the immediate velocity has nothing to do with the
previous, there is no velocity smoothing.
I remain confused by this.
If adaptive feed
On 04/14/2015 11:02 AM, andy pugh wrote:
sorry andy still working my way thru these posts, and i am slow
On 11 April 2015 at 16:13, TJoseph Powderly tjt...@gmail.com wrote:
You may find that the adaptive feedrate idea is very wrong for edm.
I think that the adaptive feed pin was introduced
g30 g30.1?
interesting when combines with retract
and i see the intermediate point would be easy
( the rufpoint might be an intermediate point from
the cone surface towards the startpoint above the workpiece.
i really have to do some drawings :|
thx for the reminder about G30
tomp tjtr33
On
I'd think those pages should point to the main page. I guess if your
trying to work with an older computer you might want the old LiveCD to
start with...
JT
On 4/14/2015 7:16 AM, andy pugh wrote:
We occasionally see potential new users of LinuxCNC following the
instructions here:
On 14 April 2015 at 13:43, John Thornton bjt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd think those pages should point to the main page.
What is the main page now? The link on the web front page links to
an email on Gmane. Which seems a bit of a strange way to do it.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
On 04/14/2015 05:46 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 14 April 2015 at 23:26, TJoseph Powderly tjt...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, seems true.
i hope your view of the time sale for reversals is
at most millisecs. the immediate velocity has nothing to do with the
previous, there is no velocity smoothing.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
