On Saturday 30 June 2018 10:44:55 TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> """And it totally ignores swarf or tool induced shorts
> when not actually doing a g38.x. """
> And...
> When you want the probe and have the swarf short... Whaddayado then?
> Did you remap to add a message and a M00, or an air blast ?
On Saturday 30 June 2018 10:18:28 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 30 June 2018 06:23:04 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 29 June 2018 20:06:44 andy pugh wrote:
> > > On 30 June 2018 at 00:52, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > > > Looks good Andrew, thanks. But checking the man page, its under
> > > >
On 05/11/2018 09:20 AM, Chris Radek wrote:
Yay! I'm glad you got it.
I recommend putting the fix on the 2.7 branch. That way it will be
in the next bugfix release, and also get merged into master.
Well, I ended up pushing the fix to master. Can you tell me
how to put it on the 2.7
Ah yes. The problem is not solved. And the stated idea of a moving two or
three inches away is still not convenient.
'nuff said' snuffy smith
Tomp
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018, 23:04 andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 June 2018 at 15:44, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
>
> > When you want the probe and have the
On 30 June 2018 at 15:44, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> When you want the probe and have the swarf short... Whaddayado then?
Get a message saying "probe already tripped before starting G38.2 move"
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial
"""And it totally ignores swarf or tool induced shorts
when not actually doing a g38.x. """
And...
When you want the probe and have the swarf short... Whaddayado then?
Did you remap to add a message and a M00, or an air blast ?
Tomp
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018, 22:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday
On Saturday 30 June 2018 06:23:04 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 29 June 2018 20:06:44 andy pugh wrote:
> > On 30 June 2018 at 00:52, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Looks good Andrew, thanks. But checking the man page, its under
> > > DEBUGGING and subject to going away at any time. Not good when
>
On Friday 29 June 2018 20:06:44 andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 June 2018 at 00:52, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Looks good Andrew, thanks. But checking the man page, its under
> > DEBUGGING and subject to going away at any time. Not good when this
> > code might be legacy code someday.
>
> I don't think
